IBJNews

  • Home

Former Star columnist’s lawsuit set for trial

IBJ Staff
January 6, 2012
Keywords
Indianapolis Star, Law, Lawsuits, Legal Issues, Media & Marketing, Newspapers, Publishing, Trial
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

An age-discrimination lawsuit brought by a former columnist for The Indianapolis Star is set to go to trial in April after a federal judge rejected the newspaper’s attempt to dismiss her complaint.

Susan G. Guyett, 63, sued the Star and its owner, Virginia-based Gannett Co., in April 2010, alleging that her age led to her dismissal in December 2008.

Guyett wrote the “Talk of Our Town” column. She charges in her suit that the content and concept of the column remained the same after it was assigned to a younger reporter.

The newspaper filed a motion to dismiss the suit, which Judge Richard L. Young denied late last month.

A jury trial is scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. April 24 at the federal courthouse in downtown Indianapolis.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • young politicians
    irene whiteFebruary 13, 2013 11:59 AM
    i have never seen you report on the younger jud mcmillin. freshman legislator. what is his secret history with glass houses and rocks. a strange analogy. please let us know how to vote for the best.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • more than money
    rickJanuary 8, 2012 5:38 PM
    These things are usually about more than money. It seems almost every business wants younger employees. The Indy Star is desperate to attract younger readers, and they likely believed a younger reporter would help do that. In truth though, their audience IS older, and a move like this is likely to turn off their most loyal readers, not attract younger ones.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
    • Age and the Workplace
      TerryJanuary 7, 2012 9:14 AM
      I hope the Star's legal team planned ahead, because this will be a trial that many employers will be watching. Rather than assign the column to a younger employee, obviously paid less than Susan, a redesign of the column's focus might have been a better move. As the economy turned downward, beginning in 2007, many companies elected to use the opportunity to release older, higher paid employees, and this type of lawsuit will be heard nationally over the next few years. They better pack the jury with young, out of work college graduates, because an elderly juror will not appreciate the release of an employee, age 63, because the bottom line needed to be improved.
      Reply to CommentFlag Comment
    • Hope the jury discovers truth
      AnonymousJanuary 6, 2012 3:11 PM
      I hope that the paper did not let her go due to her age, as that would be wrong. However, I think that it was time for her to retire anyway. I felt her column was more about writing about her well-connected local friends than actually reporting on important social events in the city, i.e. if you were not in her circle, she did not cover or write about your event.
      In any case, here's hoping that the jury finds out the true facts and that whatever the appropriate justice is, it is served accordingly.
      Reply to CommentFlag Comment
    • Go Girl!!
      GgalJanuary 6, 2012 2:13 PM
      Susan did a great job reporting the local social scene. Kathy K is good but someone has to stand up for the over 40+ crowd. You go Girl!!
      Reply to CommentFlag Comment

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    ADVANCED SEARCH
    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ

    1. Many serial killer types and psychopaths work as lowly bureaucrats, just waiting to impose their wrath on a powerless person, child, or pet. Don't forget, the BTK killer was a dog catcher.

    2. If a television station wants to improve viewership, get rid of the local blackout. I was born by the brickyard, and have attended 15 or more races. I have children now, I won't attend unless circumstances are perfect. As those with growing families know, they never are. I'm always impressed that upwards of 250,000 people attend the 500. However, as a growing, or, more apt, sprawling city, Indianapolis and its immediate suburbs count almost 2.2 million. Show the race live, let the venue get a kick-back on revenues, and open-wheel racing might have a fighting chance to be relevant again. Just in time for those tax-payer lights to make sense.

    3. John Moore, I too have had the same issue recently. A property next to my house was on the Land Bank and I was interested in purchasing. When I tried to contact Reggie, I got back emails that had nothing to do with what I asked about. Actually my latest response from him was on this past Friday. I had asked about how to buy the property and if it was still available. His response to me was to contact the mayor's office to get the schedule of his appearances. (???) Hopefully the city is able to do something to fix what this guy has done, it would be nice if they would take the properties back and sell them properly so land owners like me and you mother would have a fair chance.

    4. I too work in the industry, with over 25 years of experience and your political spin has probably nothing to do with any rebranding. "Let's dress it up" would have nothing to do with the government "telling us how and what to eat." Give it a political rest. And being a producer for a radio show doesn't mean you've been involved in advertising and branding for 30 years.

    5. Ms. Morris did not understand the ways of the business world, otherwise, like the IMS, she could have petitioned the State Legislature for a handout of State Funds for her charity work. Ms. Morris should consider becoming a state lobbyist for Lemonade Stand Operators.

    ADVERTISEMENT