IBJNews

Fraud allegations focus of secretary of state race

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Charges of voter fraud have already marred Tuesday's election for Indiana's next chief election official, with the Republican candidate accused of using a false address to cast a ballot in May's primary.

Charlie White voted in the primary for secretary of state using his ex-wife's home as his address, instead of the address of a condo he bought in February.

White says it was an honest mistake caused by his busy schedule and a new marriage, but Democrats say White intentionally committed voter fraud so he could keep his Town Council seat in the Indianapolis suburb of Fishers after moving out of the district.

State officials are investigating the allegations against White. If he wins election Tuesday but is later charged and convicted of felony voter fraud, he could be removed from office. He faces Democrat Vop Osili for the job now held by term-limited Republican Todd Rokita, who is running for Congress.

Republican incumbents were favored in the races for state treasurer and auditor.

Treasurer Richard Mourdock faces Democrat Pete Buttigieg, who has criticized Mourdock for his fight last year against Chrysler's bankruptcy proceedings — a legal challenge he took all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. Mourdock says he's proud that he stood up for Indiana pension funds affected by the Chrysler bankruptcy.

Auditor Tim Berry faces Democrat Sam Locke and Libertarian Eric Knipe. Berry is touting a new state transparency website, but Locke says the site doesn't include enough raw data about state budget numbers.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Get what we deserve
    We have the "best" government (NOT) that money, influence, bribes, and outright illegal actions can buy. Gee, if making "unintenional" blunders qualifies you to be Sec of State, then why not put in a high school drop out for Education Secretary? Or perhaps we will...This is just the norm for the Republicans where we have lobbyists running for senate, who has advices foreign counties and businesses how to take jobs overseas from Americans. Now he is there to make sure the businesses still get their tax breaks and perhaps even more.
  • Mistake
    Look, election law is complex so is campaign finance law. It is the reason some lawyers make large sums of money during election cycles. VOP made campaign finance law mistakes. Granted they were minor. The Libertarian was the only candidate that did not make any violations probably because they did not have any financial resources to commit any violations. All three candidates will learn soon enough the nuances of election and campaign finance law if they are elected. GO VOTE!!! It is the greatest right afforded any American.
  • sweet holy jeebus
    ...only in Indiana can you get elected as the person in charge of elections and you can't even vote properly/ legally yourself, WTF? looks like the Repig capacity for lying and hypocrisy knows NO limits....really, this state is doomed to be controlled by Repig criminal croneys for EVER!
  • mistake?
    Mistake or not, why would you want to put a person who can't correctly and legally register his own vote in charge of making sure your ballot gets counted?
  • Baseless Claim
    Charlie White had no motivation to vote in the wrong location. It did not give him a pay raise. None of the cadidates in the district he voted were contested. He is not required to vote in the May election to keep his seat on the Fishers Town Council. He got no benefit from intentionally voting in that district. If the prosecutors file charges, they are going to have a very hard time proving that he INTENDED to commit voter fraud. He made a mistake. It maybe stupid but not criminal. However, Mitch may try to get him to resign so that he can put in one of his loyal minions. Once he is elected, if he can do a good job over the next 2-3 years, only partisan hacks will care. He needs to get a politically savy staff with innovative ideas to help him accomplish that.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT