IBJNews

FUNNY BUSINESS: Biz buzz like "at the end of the day" puts me at the end of my rope

Mike Redmond
June 18, 2007
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

As part of my ongoing search for things to make fun of, I've spent the last few years collecting Business Buzzwords-Biz Buzz, if you will.

I now know why they're called buzzwords: Because if you read or hear more than two or three in a single sen tence, you feel a buzzing sensation in the back of your skull. Followed shortly thereafter by a full-blown migraine. That is precisely what happened to me after receiving an e-mail in which two misbegotten paragraphs contained the following Biz Buzzes: Best practice. Skill set. Core competency. Empowered. Strategic alliance. At the end of the day. I read that and had to go lie down to keep my head from exploding. (OK, that's a fib. Actually, I read it and laughed. Then I copied it into a file so I could make fun of it, much as I am doing now.) The writer was trying to get me to go in together on a project. Frankly, I would be much more inclined to do so if the proposal were stated that way ("Let's go in on a project") instead of as a big load of cow flop ("strategic moo alliance").

The clincher was the phrase, "At the end of the day." I would like to propose a moratorium on "at the end of the day." I say we stop using it ... oh, forever.

This is actually a modification of my earlier position, in which I maintained that anyone who used the phrase "at the end of the day" should be smacked upside the head with a tire iron, from the time of the infraction until the actual end of the day.

I have no idea why "at the end of the day" took off the way it did a few years ago. The good news is, it has become so popular that it's turning into a joke. "The end of the day" might have reached the end of its day.

I've come to regard Biz Buzz as being related to Jock Speak. They both involve people trying to fill up a conversation with words that contain something that sounds like communication, but is actually nothing of the kind. There's a lot of similarity between a basketball player's telling a TV sports guy that he had to just "play his game" and "give 110 percent" so he could "leave it all on the floor," and some doofus in a meeting's telling you to exercise "best practice with your skill set" so you can "go after the low-hanging fruit."

The only real difference is that one sucks all the oxygen out of a locker room, the other out of a boardroom. In each case, the same forces are at work: Either the speaker is a dope who doesn't realize how ridiculous he sounds, or the speaker thinks the listeners are dopes who don't realize it's all word salad.

So where does this stuff come from? I believe there is an army of trolls tinkering away in an underground cavern, coming up with a steady supply of new and more god-awful ways to say something without saying anything. However, I'm told that some Biz Buzz is historical (best practice, for example, has supposedly been around for decades), some is legal (due diligence may have its origins in Lawyerspeak), some is the work of consultants (relanguaging showed up last year in Consultant Land; it means "say this a different way"); and some just popped up like toadstools (see above "underground army of trolls.")

However it gets here, it is no doubt enhanced by today's speed-of-light communication. Someone in a Web meeting mentions that we need to "drink from the fire hose on this one, people" and just that fast, they're talking about drinking from fire hoses all over the world. Including places that don't even HAVE fire hoses.

So what's to be done about Biz Buzzers and their ridiculous patois? Call 'em on it. I believe the best response to Biz Buzz will always be plain-spoken English, but remember: For every buzzword you take out of circulation, the trolls will come up with two or three more.

Or, to put it their way, the relanguaging will continue long past the end of the day.



Mike Redmond's "Funny Business" column appears monthly. Bruce Hetrick's "Notions" column, previously found in this space, will appear here twice each month. Look for it next week.
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT