IBJNews

Good News Ministries eyes using ex-motel to house homeless

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The owner of a shuttered east-side motel has offered to donate his property to Good News Ministries, which hopes to turn it into a shelter and transitional housing for homeless families.

The offer, which came out of the blue last year, at first seemed like the perfect windfall for Good News. The rescue mission has operated a homeless men's shelter at Washington and Rural streets since the 1980s, and it's looking to serve more of the growing population of homeless families.

“There are so many families living on the edge in our society,” Executive Director Dan Evans said. Six shelters that already serve couples with children, or just women and children, are at-capacity every night, according to the Coalition for Homelessness Intervention and Prevention.

Evans soon realized, however, that the potential donation comes with a lot of baggage. The Indy East Motel, 5855 E. Washington St., was a crime magnet when the city revoked its business license in 2006. The business finally closed in early 2009, and neighbors hoped to see a redevelopment in keeping with plans for a $2.5 million streetscape improvement.

Irvington is a historic district, so any variances and a change in zoning for the new use as a shelter must first be approved by the city's Historic Preservation Commission. Knowing the commission takes its cues from the neighborhood, Evans said he won't accept the real estate unless the Irvington Community Council endorses his plan.

Nayan "Nick" Patel said his grandfather, Jeram Gandhi, the owner of Indy East,  decided he wanted to give the property to Good News. Patel was familiar with the organization because of its highly visible east-side location. He toured the Good News operation and was happy with what he saw. "We did a lot of research," he said.

A group of clergy from Irvington-based churches has signed a letter of support for the Good News family shelter, but so far most residents seem against it, said Jonathan Katz, an Irvingtonian who is leading a sub-committee on the proposal.

Katz said he's been deluged with questions and objections. Many of the objections stem from misinformation, he said, but there are lingering questions. One is whether Good News would succeed in raising $1.1 million for the renovation, or $350,000 for ongoing operations.

“There’s no written formal proposal,” Katz said. “There’s no balance sheet. There’s no business plan.”

Another question is whether a commercial developer would buy the property instead. Amandula Henry, executive director of the Irvington Development Organization, said her organization hasn’t done a formal study of the site, but believes there’s potential for other uses.

Evans said he's not sure how long the owner will hold out the offer. He hopes to see a decision from the neighborhood group by November, but it could come as late as January.

Despite the demand for beds at family and women's shelters, CHIP decided to back Good News only after it revised the plan to add 10 apartments where families can stay three months to two years with access to support services.

“Generally, the answer to ending homelessness in Indianapolis and anywhere else is not to increase shelter capacity,” said Michael Hurst, program director at CHIP. “The goal is to get people into affordable housing.”

There are roughly 430 transitional-housing units in the city, according to CHIP, so the Good News plan would add about 2 percent.

Good News plans to renovate 31 motel rooms to serve as emergency space for married couples or single parents with children. The six shelters that accept children have a combined 360 beds. The additional rooms would increase shelter capacity more than 8 percent.

Hurst acknowledged that if more emergency space were available now, it would be put to use. Family shelters, which notify CHIP about available beds, reach capacity every afternoon, he said. Since the recession and foreclosure crisis, traditional families—mom, dad and kids—are a more common sight at shelters, he said.

HIP's annual survey of the homeless population, conducted on a single night each January, found 213 families in 2009, a huge increase from 120 in 2008. This year, the number of families in the January count declined to 199, but Hurst predicts it will rise again. Agencies that can prevent homelessness are maxed-out, he said. “I'm worried about tears in the net this year.”

Founded in 1950, Good News Ministries owns a substantial complex at Washington and Rural streets, where it runs not only a men's shelter, but youth center, thrift store, health clinic and transitional apartments for families. For the year ended Sept. 30, 2009, Good News reported expenses of $1.56 million and revenue of $1.67 million.

Evans, who has worked at Good News since 1991, said there hasn't been a significant fund-raising campaign since adding the youth center and clinic in 2000, but he's getting positive feedback from supporters. The bulk of the rescue mission's support comes from Baptist churches, followed by Presbyterian and other denominations.

Good News noted in its 2009 Internal Revenue Service filing that its shelter housed an average 92 men a night, and 58 had “received Christ.” The men are required to attend church, and they receive counseling.

“We’re a Christian ministry,” Evans said. “The basis for everything we do is the Bible. We want to see everybody come to Jesus Christ.”
 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT