IBJNews

HardingPoorman acquires Saint Clair Press

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indianapolis-based HardingPoorman Group Inc. announced Monday that it has acquired Saint Clair Press, bringing together two of the area’s largest commercial printers.

HardingPoorman purchased Saint Clair from Houston-based Nationwide Graphics Inc., which owns more than a dozen commercial printing firms around the United States. Terms of the deal were not disclosed.

HardingPoorman, which has about 165 employees, is the area’s fifth-largest commercial printer in terms of annual printing revenue, with sales of $24.9 million in 2008, according to IBJ research.

Saint Clair, founded in 1945, is No. 8 in the area with 2008 printing sales of $10.6 million.

David Harding, president of the HardingPoorman Group, said about 25 of St. Clair’s 45 employees will remain with the combined company.

The acquisition will allow HardingPoorman to increase its offset-printing resources and retail-printing capabilities. St. Clair’s offset-printing operations will be moved into HardingPoorman’s headquarters in Park 100. Its downtown building, at 1203 E. St. Clair St., will remain under ownership of Nationwide Graphics, which intends to sell the facility.

St. Clair makes retail products such as jigsaw puzzles, games, posters, greeting cards and magazines, as well as corporate materials like annual reports and brochures.

St. Clair joins SPG Graphics, Ropkey Graphics, Full Court Press and Discom Technologies as units of HardingPoorman.

Harding said it’s been a “difficult” time for commercial printers, with overall industry sales falling about 30 percent last year, but his company has been able to survive the storm by offering a mix of services through its numerous divisions. The St. Clair acquisition fits that strategy.

“We feel successful companies have to offer clients a wide variety of services,” he said.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT