IBJNews

Health care Q&A: Greg Pemberton

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Executive Q & A

Greg Pemberton, a health care attorney at the local law firm Ice Miller LLP specializing in sales and mergers among health care providers, discussed the biggest changes he expects to come out of the federal health reform bills. On Thursday at the downtown Westin hotel, Pemberton and his Ice Miller colleagues will describe how “it’s not going to be business as usual” to about 100 local business leaders at a conference co-sponsored by the Indiana Chamber of Commerce.

IBJ: Assuming something close to the Senate-House health reform bills pass, what will be the biggest change in the law for health care providers?

A: The disruption of so many changes all at once. There are so many changes being mandated in this legislation, it really will by necessity have an impact on the way care is delivered. Probably the single biggest thing the provider community is going to have to do is get ahead of these demonstration projects [such as Medicare paying multiple providers all at once for one episode of care, or refusing to pay for patients readmitted to a hospital shortly after a stay there]. Some of these this time are definitely going to have to be taken seriously because they represent the cutting edge of what the system is moving to next.
 
IBJ: Even after passage, how much of the real impact of these bills would remain “to be determined” by the administrative rule-writing process?

A: There are some areas where rule making is going to be needed to flesh out the details of federal regulation. But in some respects, there is going to be a much larger effect. That will be from benefit design and assistance changes [by private employers]. That’s a very, very volatile market right now. You’ve got to look at what your business model has been, because it’s going to change. It isn’t going to be business as usual.
 
IBJ: Five years after these bills take effect [in either 2013 or 2014] what's the biggest change you expect to see in the Indiana/Indianapolis health care landscape?

A: The safest thing to predict is a consolidation on the provider side, from a business perspective and an operation perspective. With emphasis on hospitals, doctors, home health, long-term care, the entire continuum. During [the] next few years, in the phase-in [of the bills], that’s exactly what providers will do.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT