IBJNews

Health care Q&A: Greg Pemberton

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Executive Q & A

Greg Pemberton, a health care attorney at the local law firm Ice Miller LLP specializing in sales and mergers among health care providers, discussed the biggest changes he expects to come out of the federal health reform bills. On Thursday at the downtown Westin hotel, Pemberton and his Ice Miller colleagues will describe how “it’s not going to be business as usual” to about 100 local business leaders at a conference co-sponsored by the Indiana Chamber of Commerce.

IBJ: Assuming something close to the Senate-House health reform bills pass, what will be the biggest change in the law for health care providers?

A: The disruption of so many changes all at once. There are so many changes being mandated in this legislation, it really will by necessity have an impact on the way care is delivered. Probably the single biggest thing the provider community is going to have to do is get ahead of these demonstration projects [such as Medicare paying multiple providers all at once for one episode of care, or refusing to pay for patients readmitted to a hospital shortly after a stay there]. Some of these this time are definitely going to have to be taken seriously because they represent the cutting edge of what the system is moving to next.
 
IBJ: Even after passage, how much of the real impact of these bills would remain “to be determined” by the administrative rule-writing process?

A: There are some areas where rule making is going to be needed to flesh out the details of federal regulation. But in some respects, there is going to be a much larger effect. That will be from benefit design and assistance changes [by private employers]. That’s a very, very volatile market right now. You’ve got to look at what your business model has been, because it’s going to change. It isn’t going to be business as usual.
 
IBJ: Five years after these bills take effect [in either 2013 or 2014] what's the biggest change you expect to see in the Indiana/Indianapolis health care landscape?

A: The safest thing to predict is a consolidation on the provider side, from a business perspective and an operation perspective. With emphasis on hospitals, doctors, home health, long-term care, the entire continuum. During [the] next few years, in the phase-in [of the bills], that’s exactly what providers will do.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............

ADVERTISEMENT