SKARBECK: Hedge fund superstars take it on the chin

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Lauded as “masters of the universe,” the star investment managers overseeing the largest hedge funds built huge firms.

Many followers believed these managers, with their ability to go long or short and hedge their portfolios, could consistently produce positive returns, uncorrelated to the ups and downs of the broader securities markets.

The auras surrounding many of these financial titans have faded, though, shattered by the market meltdown. Huge losses have driven some out of business, while others have been left severely wounded.

Upon further review, many of these funds were not properly hedged portfolios, but instead were pools of money run by cowboy capitalists, making huge bets with borrowed money. That was the eventual source of their undoing.

On the heels of massive losses, waves of investors have requested withdrawals. Unfortunately, some funds employed tactics to delay or block those demands since their portfolios were chock full of illiquid and hard-to-value investments. As a result of the losses and illiquidity, investors such as pension funds and endowments have been rethinking the significant allocations they have made in alternative investments.

The endowments of Harvard and Yale universities had achieved excess returns for more than a decade from alternative investments, yet both sustained 30-percent losses last year.

Among the once-esteemed alternative managers, Cerberus Capital, run by Stephen Feinberg, has been trying to placate investors who want to withdraw $5 billion. That amounts to 70 percent of the firm’s assets after a 24.5-percent loss in 2008. Cerberus sustained huge losses investing in Chrysler and GMAC.

Ken Griffin, the wunderkind of Chicago-based Citadel Investment Group, had generated 26-percent annualized returns the past 17 years, but almost destroyed his firm with a 55-percent loss last year.

Citadel took out loans worth nine times more than its assets, and spent much of last year trying to raise cash to pay back lenders.

You may withhold your sympathy for Timothy Barakett, who earned $675 million in 2006, but closed Atticus Capital after losing 30 percent last year.

Then there is John Meriwether, who presided over the collapse of Long Term Capital Management in 2008, and was forced to close his second hedge fund after losing 44 percent from September 2007 to February 2009.

Elsewhere, Pequot Capital, at one time the world’s largest hedge fund under Art Samberg, liquidated in May after being cited by the Securities & Exchange Commission in 44 cases of potential insider trading and market manipulation.

We once noted—back in 2007, when the private-equity funds Blackstone and Fortress were going public—that those transactions were signs of investment hype typically seen at peaks. Yet, predictably, the consultants to pensions and endowments were at the time advising large allocations into alternative assets.

Now, ironically, as alternative investors seek to extricate themselves from their illiquid investments, they are likely to cut deals to sell to vulture investors at bargain prices.•


Skarbeck is managing partner of Indianapolis-based Aldebaran Capital LLC, a money management firm. His column appears every other week. Views expressed are his own. He can be reached at 818-7827 or ken@aldebarancapital.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1