HENDERSON: Thinking outside the neurotypical hiring box

Tom Henderson
October 30, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

LeCrone mugThere’s a screening process we often use in the human resources process that’s meant to identify prospective candidates. It needs re-thinking.

In our quest to recruit hires, we imagine/define the work, then develop a profile or criteria that are normal for that work. The hiring process is expensive, of course, as is the overall cost of either replacing people or filling new spots.

There’s time pressure. Get someone in that spot quickly (maybe before budget is lost). Processes are spawned to advertise the spot(s), get applications and resumes, then comb through them to find individuals who fit the profile. There’s a bell curve in that profile. Some candidates are simply outside the profile and have blindly sent their responses in the vague hope that numbers exceed qualification targeting. Filtration becomes almost obsessive.

This works both ways.

Hidden in our hiring logic is something that seeks what Lisa Daxer, a student at Wright State University, calls “neurotypical” candidates. Lisa, a biomedicine student at Wright State who was profiled on National Public Radio, isn’t in the bell curve, and she knows it. She has autism spectral disorder. She writes a blog, and tells of her struggle to understand social cues, like facial expressions. I understand where she comes from, as I have a brother who’s similar: He’s autistic and is often completely socially clueless.

Lisa’s made the leap to try to live in our alien world. Her adaptations are likely to allow her to use her skills (autistic individuals often make brilliant engineers, chemists and accountants) for not only her own success but her employer’s, too. One day, she’s going to succeed and likely make some employer very happy.

Individuals with dyslexia also might be at the edge of the neurotypical bell curve. Dyslexia is a language learning disorder. Dyslexics often make rotten spellers and perhaps difficult readers; this is a byproduct of a typically larger right brain, which, like many autistic brains, does things differently. People mistakenly call dyslexics stupid during their early learning years.

Dyslexics have, because of their incredible right brains, much to offer. Famous examples include Albert Einstein, Thomas Edison and Cher. My daughter, who’s moderately dyslexic, is in a doctoral program at Rochester Institute of Technology in color theory. This doctorate follows degrees in geology and bassoon performance. Her tenacity is as wide as her vision. In spite of these accomplishments, weak spelling would perhaps trip the filters.

Remediating disabilities and learning disorders requires flexibility. The range of functionality in autistic individuals to a particular daily work life can vary. Highly functioning individuals may require only understanding that, generally, autism means an individual may not be able to read social cues, or may need direct, clear, concise direction—and benefit from playing these back to ensure understanding.

In some cases, individuals with autism and learning disorders can get training or adaptation assistance from various vocational rehabilitation agencies to help adapt to a specific career. Assistance comes in the form of potential trainers and job counselors, and occasionally, initial subsidy during the adaptation process.

The accommodations made are similar to those with mobility challenges, but involve integrating a new personality type into a team. Like those with other challenges, people with learning disorders and non-neurotypical brains can achieve astounding results. Widen your filters and get the benefits.

Job-position adaptation for dyslexics is often simpler. Dyslexics are often poor spellers. Spell checkers are mandatory. Look at content rather than Webster’s. Reinforce double-checking numeric entries, as dyslexics often swap numbers and letters unwittingly. You can introduce procedural quality-of-entry checks that improve accuracy when necessary. Strangely, one of my best editors was dyslexic and covered it up wonderfully.

The benefits to flexibility and adaptation are adding employees with occasionally extraordinary skills who can make teams stronger (if the team can copy your desired flexibility) and more productive. And you’re putting good people to work, long term, who often become fiercely loyal employees.•


Henderson is managing director of ExtremeLabs Inc., a Bloomington computer analysis firm.



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

  2. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

  3. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

  4. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

  5. I live downtown Indy and had to be in downtown Chicago for a meeting. In other words, I am the target demographic for this train. It leaves at 6:00-- early but doable. Then I saw it takes 5+ hours. No way. I drove. I'm sure I paid 3 to 5 times as much once you factor in gas, parking, and tolls, but it was reimbursed so not a factor for me. Any business traveler is going to take the option that gets there quickly and reliably... and leisure travelers are going to take the option that has a good schedule and promotional prices (i.e., Megabus). Indy to Chicago is the right distance (too short to fly but takes several hours to drive) that this train could be extremely successful even without subsidies, if they could figure out how to have several frequencies (at least 3x/day) and make the trip in a reasonable amount of time. For those who have never lived on the east coast-- Amtrak is the #1 choice for NY-DC and NY-Boston. They have the Acela service, it runs almost every hour, and it takes you from downtown to downtown. It beats driving and flying hands down. It is too bad that we cannot build something like this in the midwest, at least to connect the bigger cities.