HENDERSON: Thinking outside the neurotypical hiring box

Tom Henderson
October 30, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

LeCrone mugThere’s a screening process we often use in the human resources process that’s meant to identify prospective candidates. It needs re-thinking.

In our quest to recruit hires, we imagine/define the work, then develop a profile or criteria that are normal for that work. The hiring process is expensive, of course, as is the overall cost of either replacing people or filling new spots.

There’s time pressure. Get someone in that spot quickly (maybe before budget is lost). Processes are spawned to advertise the spot(s), get applications and resumes, then comb through them to find individuals who fit the profile. There’s a bell curve in that profile. Some candidates are simply outside the profile and have blindly sent their responses in the vague hope that numbers exceed qualification targeting. Filtration becomes almost obsessive.

This works both ways.

Hidden in our hiring logic is something that seeks what Lisa Daxer, a student at Wright State University, calls “neurotypical” candidates. Lisa, a biomedicine student at Wright State who was profiled on National Public Radio, isn’t in the bell curve, and she knows it. She has autism spectral disorder. She writes a blog, and tells of her struggle to understand social cues, like facial expressions. I understand where she comes from, as I have a brother who’s similar: He’s autistic and is often completely socially clueless.

Lisa’s made the leap to try to live in our alien world. Her adaptations are likely to allow her to use her skills (autistic individuals often make brilliant engineers, chemists and accountants) for not only her own success but her employer’s, too. One day, she’s going to succeed and likely make some employer very happy.

Individuals with dyslexia also might be at the edge of the neurotypical bell curve. Dyslexia is a language learning disorder. Dyslexics often make rotten spellers and perhaps difficult readers; this is a byproduct of a typically larger right brain, which, like many autistic brains, does things differently. People mistakenly call dyslexics stupid during their early learning years.

Dyslexics have, because of their incredible right brains, much to offer. Famous examples include Albert Einstein, Thomas Edison and Cher. My daughter, who’s moderately dyslexic, is in a doctoral program at Rochester Institute of Technology in color theory. This doctorate follows degrees in geology and bassoon performance. Her tenacity is as wide as her vision. In spite of these accomplishments, weak spelling would perhaps trip the filters.

Remediating disabilities and learning disorders requires flexibility. The range of functionality in autistic individuals to a particular daily work life can vary. Highly functioning individuals may require only understanding that, generally, autism means an individual may not be able to read social cues, or may need direct, clear, concise direction—and benefit from playing these back to ensure understanding.

In some cases, individuals with autism and learning disorders can get training or adaptation assistance from various vocational rehabilitation agencies to help adapt to a specific career. Assistance comes in the form of potential trainers and job counselors, and occasionally, initial subsidy during the adaptation process.

The accommodations made are similar to those with mobility challenges, but involve integrating a new personality type into a team. Like those with other challenges, people with learning disorders and non-neurotypical brains can achieve astounding results. Widen your filters and get the benefits.

Job-position adaptation for dyslexics is often simpler. Dyslexics are often poor spellers. Spell checkers are mandatory. Look at content rather than Webster’s. Reinforce double-checking numeric entries, as dyslexics often swap numbers and letters unwittingly. You can introduce procedural quality-of-entry checks that improve accuracy when necessary. Strangely, one of my best editors was dyslexic and covered it up wonderfully.

The benefits to flexibility and adaptation are adding employees with occasionally extraordinary skills who can make teams stronger (if the team can copy your desired flexibility) and more productive. And you’re putting good people to work, long term, who often become fiercely loyal employees.•


Henderson is managing director of ExtremeLabs Inc., a Bloomington computer analysis firm.



Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............