HHGregg shares surge on strong quarterly profit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

HHGregg Inc.’s stock price shot up nearly 20 percent late Wednesday morning after the Indianapolis-based appliance and electronics retailer reported strong earnings.

Wall Street responded to the company’s higher profit in its fiscal second quarter by sending shares up $2.35, to $14.48.

HHGregg earned $6 million, or 16 cents per share, in the three-month period ended Sept. 30. That compared with a profit of $3.9 million, or 10 cents per share, in the same quarter a year ago.

Analysts had expected profit of 6 cents per share.

Quarterly revenue climbed 28.6 percent, to $618.6 million.

HHGregg attributed the rise in profit to an increase in revenue from the addition of 35 stores within the past year as well as a 1.5-percent increase in same-store sales.

The company had reported four straight quarters of declining same-store sales, so the increase was welcome news.

“At the beginning of the year, we laid out our strategic initiatives for fiscal 2012, which included growing appliance market share, launching a new e-commerce site, expanding our assortment in the home office category, launching a new advertising campaign, extending our market share in the video category and ultimately restoring the company to positive comparable store sales,” CEO Dennis May said Wednesday morning in a conference call with investors.

“As we sit here today we are pleased with our execution on these initiatives and with our performance during the fiscal second quarter.”

In stores open at least a year, video sales dipped 4 percent, but home office and appliance sales increased 23.9 percent and 7 percent, respectively. Increased demand for notebook computers and tablets bolstered home office sales.

“I am very pleased to report that our comparable store sales increased 7 percent in the appliance category,” May said. “This significantly outpaced the industry, which was reported down in low single digits.”

Indeed, lower-than-expected demand from skittish U.S. consumers hurt third-quarter results for the world's two biggest makers of home appliances, Whirlpool Corp. and Electrolux AB, according to The Wall Street Journal.

Whirlpool, the world's largest appliance maker, based in Benton Harbor, Mich., reported a 9.2-percent fall in third-quarter earnings. No. 2 Electrolux, based in Sweden, posted a 15-percent drop.

HHGregg rebounded from a poor performance in the previous quarter, when disappointing sales at stores open at least a year dragged the company to just its second quarterly loss since going public in 2007. In the previous quarter, HHGregg lost $800,000, or 2 cents per share, as revenue dipped 1 percent, to $431.5 million.

HHGregg expects to open between 20 and 25 new stores in fiscal 2013, primarily in markets surrounding a regional distribution center it opened in the Chicago area earlier this year. New stores are expected to open in St. Louis, Milwaukee and in other locations in Illinois.

Looking toward the holiday shopping season, May expects same-store sales to increase between 3 percent and 7 percent.

The company operated 204 stores as of Sept. 30, up from 169 during the same period in 2010.

HHGregg adjusted its fiscal 2012 earnings-per-share guidance to a range of $1.26 to $1.41 from the previously expected $1.20 to $1.35 per share to account for share repurchases. Since May, the company has repurchased 2.7 million shares of its common stock at a total cost of $35 million.


  • Good for HHGregg
    It's nice to see a local company doing well in such a competitive, cut-throat segment. I find the sales people at the 96th street store extremely knowledgeable and helpful. They have great sales with leading brands.
  • Why I will not buy at HH Gregg
    Twice I went thee to buy something. Neither time did the salesman know enough about the product to give information on it. One time, I asked for info and he said he did not know that much about how it worked and they did not have an instruction book handy. ''Once I buy the boxed product and take it home, I will find instructions inside the box and I can read them then''.

    Of course, I went elsewhere to buy.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing