IBJNews

  • Home

Hillenbrand profits rise despite revenue declines

 IBJ Staff
November 24, 2009
Keywords
Health Care & Insurance, Health Care & Life Sciences
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Hillenbrand Inc. on Tuesday morning reported higher fourth quarter and full-year profits than a year ago, despite lower revenue in both time periods.

The Batesville-based maker of funeral-services products posted a profit of $22.6 million in the fourth quarter ended Sept. 30, a 17.7-percent increase over the same quarter of 2008. Earnings per share rose 19.4 percent, from 31 cents to 37 cents.

Hillenbrand’s fourth quarter revenue dropped 3.6 percent, to $153.1 million.

For the fiscal year, Hillenbrand earned $102.3 million, an increase of 9.8 percent over fiscal 2008. Earnings per share rose 11.4 percent, from $1.49 to $1.66. Revenue was $649.1 million, a decrease of 4.3 percent.

Improved investment returns and lower costs on diesel fuel and raw materials used in Hillenbrand’s products helped improve company earnings despite the decreases in revenue.

Hillenbrand also said it expects 2010 revenue to be from 3 percent below to 3.1 percent above 2009 revenue, ranging from $630 million to $670 million. Earnings per diluted share will range from $1.40 to $1.67, it said, with profit projected to be between $86 million and $103 million.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

ADVANCED SEARCH
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ

  1. Irvington is up and coming much like Fountain Square. We would love to have something like this in our neighborhood!

  2. Why do we care who has submitted proposals if we can't review the proposals? It's publicly owned land, but the public has zero say in what gets chosen to be built there. Yep, that sounds about right.

  3. Perhaps May 21 is "Evangelical Day" over at the IBJ?

  4. I don't know what's more depressing: that this passes for a defensible elective in a publicly funded SCIENCE class, or that more than half of the posters here are defending this charlatan. Intelligent design is creationism. Creationism is religion. Yes, we have freedom of religion, which deserves to be protected. Now someone kindly show Professor Hedin his freedom by escorting him over to the Religion department at BSU. Carry on.

  5. I hope people realize that the 'vocal' opposition at the meeting represent the minority of people against this project. As with any controversial project - those who don't want it are the loudest, while those who like it or really don't care one way or the other don't come to such meetings. Unfortunately the same may be true of the survey now being offered by the BRVA. I live less than a 5 minute walk from BR Avenue and can tell you that I and most of my neighbors are support this exciting project, or are ambivalent. And how great that it includes quality apartments - something that BR sorely lacks. This is a first class opportunity that we should embrace (and no, I'm not with the BRVA or the developer.) As for the fellow who owns the Good Earth store, if he doesn't want competition then let him pull together his own investors and out bid Whole Foods to operate the proposed grocery component! Come on folks - let's move ahead.

ADVERTISEMENT