IBJNews

Homeless-aid group up and running in Indianapolis

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A fast-growing national organization that gets homeless people involved in running is expanding to Indianapolis.

Back on My Feet, founded in Philadelphia in 2007, will launch its seventh chapter here Tuesday with an early-morning run along the Central Canal downtown. The organization has already landed several corporate sponsors, including the JW Marriott, White Lodging and others with a downtown presence. The Coalition for Homelessness Intervention and Prevention is also a sponsor.

Back on My Feet forms running teams at homeless shelters. Those participants who maintain attendance and a good attitude become eligible for the “Next Steps” program, which offers educational and job-training opportunities, as well as cash for “approved purchases or investments,” the organization’s website says.

Ten of the runners participating in Tuesday’s launch are homeless veterans and clients of Hoosier Veterans Assistance Foundation. “We are using every resource available to eliminate homelessness for those who have served our country, and our new partnership with Back on My Feet gives us another way to engage veterans in need and their families,” HVAF CEO Charles Haenlein said in a prepared statement. “It takes dedication, perseverance and strength to run a marathon, and these qualities, when matched with our HVAF career services and programs, will help our clients succeed in finding a job or a home and accomplishing the goals they have for themselves and their families.”

Back on My Feet grew out of a running club that founder Anne Mahlum formed with residents of a homeless shelter that was on her morning jogging route in Philadelphia. The not-for-profit now has chapters in Philadelphia; Washington, D.C.; Baltimore; Chicago; Boston; and Dallas.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Getting involved
    This sounds like a great cause! How can i get involved from a volunteer standpoint? I live in the downtown area and i am a runner.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT