IBJNews

Home-sale deals tick up in Indianapolis area

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Home-sale agreements in the nine-county Indianapolis area ticked up 3.6 percent in July compared with the same month last year, marking the third straight month of year-over-year increases after 14 months of declining sales.

Sales agreements climbed to 1,833 last month, an increase of 64 homes over July 2010, according to a report released Thurday by F.C. Tucker Co.

While higher than a year ago, July’s sales were about 22 percent below what they were in the same month of 2009, when 2,351 home-sales agreements were reached.

Year-to-date sales agreements are down 6.7 percent compared to the same period of 2010.

Marion County saw a 5.4-percent rise in July sales agreements from a year earlier, from 747 to 787. Hamilton County deals dropped 4.2 percent, from 402 to 385. Hancock County saw a 44-percent increase, from 59 to 85.

Available homes for sale in the nine-county region dropped 11 percent in July, with 15,431 homes on the market. Marion County’s inventory dropped 14.8 percent.

Year-to-date sale prices are up 1.6 percent in 2011, from $148,759 to $151,157.

So far this year, sales agreements have been reached on 71 homes in the area priced at $500,000 or more.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • really Paul;
    Paul you seem to want to not trust anyone, i would think asking the leading Real Estate Company in the State for numbers and facts on the market is a good place to start. When numbers were down in the past few years they did not sugarcoat it and push false numbers. But you just don’t want to trust anyone and only hear what the national media has to say about the markets. I would disagree 100% that Tucker is not an expert in the market. That’s like saying a fox doesn’t know the best way to eat a hen...
  • Not rubbish
    F.C. Tucker compiles its monthly statistics from a report put together by the Metropolitan Indianapolis Board of Realtors, which tracks area residential real estate sales through its Multiple Listing Service.

    Local media has been reporting statistics from MIBOR and F.C. Tucker for decades, and nobody has ever disputed the reliability of their numbers.

    And if Tucker distorted those numbers, I'm pretty sure a competitor would call them on it almost immediately.

    That being said, if you can recommend an independent party that compiles regular residential real estate statistics about the Indianapolis area, we'd be glad to consider using them.
  • Yeah, right
    These numbers are suspect, because there is an inherent conflict of interest in their release. FC Tucker is not a market expert. They are a market participant. They generate income by generating sales, so it is in their best interest to represent the market in the best light possible. It is foolish to ask the fox how things are going in the hen house. I can't for the life of me understand why any reputable journalist would print such rubbish.
    • IBJ
      Good article.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

    2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

    3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

    4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

    5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

    ADVERTISEMENT