IBJNews

Interstate 70 shortcut getting an obstacle

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A popular shortcut for west-side Indianapolis motorists heading south on Interstate 465 to get to eastbound I-70 is about to be spoiled by that most vile, three-eyed monster.

A traffic signal.

The Indiana Department of Transportation has eliminated the existing flyover ramp from plans to rebuild the Sam Jones Expressway interchange at I-465, formerly known as Airport Expressway.

Westsiders who've attended INDOT’s public meetings may have picked up on the final design, but word of the design change is slowly wafting to the motoring masses.

For years, motorists southbound on I-465 have used the flyover ramp to zip onto eastbound Sam Jones, then go a mile or so and merge onto I-70 East.

The unpleasant alternative was to travel another mile south on I-465, then shoehorn onto a short ramp shared with cars pouring onto I-465 from westbound I-70.

The white-knuckle procedure also requires motorists to slow quickly to avoid flipping over while curving sharply right on a cloverleaf that shoots them onto I-70 East.

Under INDOT’s final plan for the Sam Jones interchange, southbound I-465 motorists will drive straight to a traffic signal atop Sam Jones. When the light turns green, they can turn left and proceed the mile or so down the road to the I-70 interchange.

Say it isn’t so, I-465 regulars will cry.

INDOT says it's out to rid the interstate of “substandard” cloverleafs.

Specific to Sam Jones, the agency notes that the airport terminal has moved west and the volume of traffic on Sam Jones isn't what it used to be.

Also, building a new eastbound flyover ramp to replace the existing one at Sam Jones isn’t as simple as it sounds given other reconfigurations planned for the interchange, said INDOT spokesman Will Wingfield.

Cheer up, he says: “The light will obviously be timed according to traffic movements.”

Unfortunately, faith in traffic-signal timing ranks about as high as belief in the Easter Bunny among impatient motorists.

INDOT offers further consolation, noting that it simultaneously will be reconfiguring the I-465/I-70 interchange a mile to the south.

To go from southbound I-465 to eastbound I-70, motorists will use an improved version of the cloverleaf that winds them around to the right and onto eastbound I-70.

But INDOT plans to build a collector/distributor ramp separated from I-465 southbond. Motorists will enter this collector ramp farther north on I-465.

Motorists entering southbound I-465 from westbound I-70 will still enter the highway at that same pinch point, but they’ll not have to be in such a hurry to merge onto I-70 because the new collector/distributor lane will take them further south before merging onto I-465 south.

Motorists headed southbound on I-465 wishing to drive to the new airport terminal will be able to take a new set of dedicated lanes running alongside I-70 to the new terminal exit, without having to merge onto I-70 proper.

The Sam Jones and I-70 interchanges are expected to cost roughly $88 million, combined. Construction is already underway on both.  

A closer look can be found at INDOT’s website.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Will be ok
    If I recall correctly this movement will be a triple left movement onto Sam Jones. Should work fine without backups onto I-70.
  • Waitaminit!
    While I agree changing the ramp at Sam Jones from a flyover to a suburban exit, complete with stoplight, is an idiotic move - check the map two exits further south. From the map, it sure LOOKS like they're eliminating the Indiana 67 / Kentucky Av. exit altogether! Did someone goof, or what?
  • FAIL!
    Adding a stoplight instead of a flyover?!?!! That's quite a backwards step. Obviously the planners don't drive that route, or they'd realize it already backs up every morning without the stoplight! People don't use that just for jumping on 70, but for getting to workplaces like Rolls-Royce, Eli-Lilly, etc. Yet another fail for taxpayers.
  • Idiotic
    Iditic to remove the Flyover ramp from 465 S to Sam Jones East. What are they thinking and then to make you use a 270 degree cloverleaf at I-70? St00pid, with a capital 00!
  • I'm with Curt
    $88 million would go a long way to not needing to drive to the airport. I'd love to drive to my local train stop then zone out for 45 minutes until I got to the airport.

    Until that day arrives in Indianapolis, I'm all for removing unnecessary flyover ramps and replacing them with an inexpensive stoplight.
  • ...
    What frustrates me is that we spend $88 million on an "interchange" and it barely registers on citizen's radar.

    Yet propose something about spending money on other modes of transportation improvement and people think that the gestapo is out to rid the region of automobiles.
  • Really?!?
    I am so not happy about the plans that were abandoned at I-70 & 465... Why on earth would be pay millions of dollars and put in a "new" coverleaf... It's still a coverleaf!!! And with this switch at Sam Jones, I betcha there will be a LOT more traffic on this coverleaf than they think. Maybe add some other exit options and it would allieveate this mess.
    And bet I could have come up with a better design for cheaper. Sometimes I really don't the people who make these proposals have ever driven the stretch at all hours of the day.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT