IBJNews

Indiana Democrats pushing for more health care action

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Democratic lawmakers pushed Wednesday for Indiana to take steps toward implementing the federal health care overhaul that Republicans who control state government have so far rejected.

States have the option of setting up their own insurance exchanges to allow individuals and small businesses to compare and buy private insurance policies. They also can partner with the federal government, or if they fail to act, the federal government will run one for them.

Republican Gov. Mike Pence, who took office Monday, has ruled out a state-run health insurance exchange in Indiana, arguing its estimated $50 million cost wouldn't be worth the limited autonomy the state would gain.

Democrats maintain a state-run exchange would better serve residents, and Sen. Karen Tallian, D-Portage, said that she has filed a bill to put one in place.

"We need to get on board with setting up this exchange," Tallian said. "We need local control and participation in this is inevitable. ... There's no reason why, just off the top, we should ignore the possibility of doing an Indiana-controlled exchange."

Republicans dominate both the Indiana House and Senate and several of them have previously attacked the Affordable Care Act backed by President Barack Obama as burdensome and unconstitutional.

The decision by Pence, who opposed the overhaul while he was in Congress, likely means the federal government alone will design the online marketplace that Indiana residents will use to choose among health insurance policies when coverage begins in 2014.

Last year's U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding the health care law makes the overhaul impossible for the states to ignore, and Indiana officials should talk more about how to develop a state-run exchange that will work best for Indiana residents, said Rep. Ed DeLaney, D-Indianapolis.

"I'm paying taxes to fund this program on a national basis, so I'm going to pay for the guy in Illinois and guy in Michigan to have this health care, but I'm not going to give it to my fellow Hoosiers," DeLaney said.

Republican House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Tim Brown said he believed the state should be cautious before taking the step of in starting its own exchange.

"There's going to be a lot of inefficiencies in the beginning," Brown said. "States that are going to go to a state-only exchange, I think, are going to have a lot of growing pains. So hopefully Indiana can learn and make a decision at a later date whether it is worthwhile."

Tallian's bill also calls for an eligibility expansion for the state's Medicaid program by raising the income limits for a family of four to $33,000. She said the state's current Medicaid cutoff for such families is $4,100 a year and that the change would provide health care coverage to as many as 400,000 people, with federal funding covering most of the cost.

Brown said he was leery of eligibility expansion when the cost of the state's current Medicaid program was projected to grow by between 11 percent and 17 percent over the next two years.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Good for those who have access to healthcare only
    What about those of us or those we love who's employer does not provide health insurance. The public option comes as a relief to those who can not afford to privatly insure themselves. Try going without coverage or shop pricing before nixing the public option or federal healthcare as a bad plan. I guess I don't understand how requiring people to be covered and actually pay into the healthcare system (even if they don't use it) would be bad for the state / country. Seems as if conservatives would support this option.
  • Good
    The GOP must stand up to the tax more/spend more crowd. Evelyn - try turning off CNN
  • What do you expect from Rebuplicans?
    The GOP is against anything that will help the middle class. They really do not give a darn about us at all. I do not understand how the people of Indiana can be so uncaring and such right wing nuts.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT