IBJNews

  • Home

Indiana Downs owner halts lawsuit amid bankruptcy

Bloomberg News
May 18, 2011
Keywords
Banking & Finance, Bankruptcy, Casinos, Gambling, Horse Tracks, Law, Lawsuits, Regional News, Shelby County, Shelbyville
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Cordish Cos., a real-estate developer trying to build a casino near Baltimore, must temporarily halt a defamation lawsuit against the chief executive officer of Shelbyville casino owner Indianapolis Downs LLC, a federal judge said Tuesday.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon on Tuesday granted a request to suspend legal action against CEO Ross J. Mangano, saying the lawsuit would disrupt the company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Indianapolis Downs owns the Indiana Downs horse track and Indiana Live casino.

Cordish filed suit in February, claiming it was defamed by competing casino companies and their executives, including Mangano, casino owner Penn National Gaming Inc. and horse-track owner Frank Stronach.

Mangano and Stronach allegedly were “part of an ongoing campaign designed to smear, defame and otherwise falsely portray the Cordish entities for the purpose of harming them economically and influencing both the Maryland state Legislature and lottery commission,” according to the suit.

Baltimore-based Cordish needs the support of the commission and state lawmakers to open its proposed casino. The company is fighting horse-track owner Indianapolis Downs in bankruptcy court in Wilmington, Del., over a management contract between the companies.

The Indiana Downs track opened in 2002, and the casino began operations in 2008. It has 2,000 slot machines and electronic table games. Revenue in 2010 was $270 million.

Indianapolis Downs filed for bankruptcy in April after failing to pay interest on time on $375 million in second lien notes, the company said in court papers. Last week, the casino laid off about 30 members of its 800-person staff.

Indianapolis Downs denied Cordish’s allegations in court papers. In a statement in February, Stronach’s company, MI Developments Inc., called the suit meritless.

Shannon’s order doesn’t prevent Cordish from pursuing its case against Stronach and the other defendants who are not involved in the bankruptcy.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

ADVANCED SEARCH
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ

  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT