IBJNews

Indiana high court takes over secretary of state dispute

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Supreme Court on Tuesday decided to take over the legal battle in which Democrats are trying to have convicted Republican Secretary of State Charlie White replaced by their 2010 candidate for that office.

The state's highest court set a Feb. 29 hearing for arguments over whether Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels should be allowed to appoint a replacement for White or Democratic candidate Vop Osili should take over the office.

The Supreme Court also denied without comment a request that lawyers for the state Democratic Party made Monday to the state appeals court that it enforce a Marion County judge's December decision in a civil case ordering the state recount commission to declare Osili as the election winner.

That action followed a Hamilton County jury's verdict over the weekend convicting White of six felony criminal charges, including voter fraud for lying about his residence by using his ex-wife's Fishers address on voter registration forms. Democrats have maintained in the civil case that White wasn't an eligible candidate for the 2010 election and that Osili was the eligible candidate who received the most votes.

Democratic Party lawyer Karen Celestino-Horseman said she was pleased that the Supreme Court decided to take over the case and that by setting the hearing for this month it could prevent a long period of uncertainty over who should lead the secretary of state's office, which responsibilities includes oversight of elections.

Daniels on Saturday named the office's top counsel, Jerry Bonnet, as interim secretary of state, but indicated he would wait until after White's Feb. 23 sentencing hearing to decide on a permanent appointment. White's defense attorney said he will ask the judge to reduce the convictions to misdemeanors, which would allow White's return to office.

The state attorney general's office had asked for an expedited review from the state Supreme Court.

"What the public needs now is an objective and unambiguous ruling from the Indiana Supreme Court to bring certainty, clarity and finality to this situation, 15 months after the election. It was highly unusual for a trial court to overrule a unanimous administrative decision of the Recount Commission in a statewide election, so at the very least the trial court's ruling ought to be reviewed by the state's highest court," Attorney General Greg Zoeller said in a statement.

The attorney general's office is representing the state recount commission, which found White's candidacy was legitimate in a 3-0 vote last June.

Celestino-Horseman said she hoped Daniels wouldn't take quick action between White's sentencing hearing and a decision by the Supreme Court.

"Obviously the governor can make any choice he wants, but since we know there is going to be an expedited decision by the Supreme Court nothing is lost by waiting," she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. why oh why does this state continue to elect these people....do you wonder how much was graft out of the 3.8 billion?

  2. i too think this is a great idea. I think the vision and need is there as well. But also agree with Wendy that there may be better location in our city to fulfill this vision and help grow the sports of hockey and figure skating in Indy. Also to help further develop other parts of the city that seem often forgotten. Any of the other 6 townships out side of the three northernmost could benefit greatly from a facility and a vision like this. For a vision that sounds philanthropic, the location is appears more about the money. Would really like to see it elsewhere, but still wish the development the best of luck, as we can always use more ice in the city. As for the Ice growth when they return, if schedules can be coordinated with the Fuel, what could be better than to have high level hockey available to go see every weekend of the season? Good luck with the development and the return of the Ice.

  3. How many parking spaces do they have at Ironworks? Will residents have reserved spaces or will they have to troll for a space among the people that are there at Ruth Chris & Sangiovese?

  4. You do not get speeding ticket first time you speed and this is not first time Mr.Page has speed. One act should not define a man and this one act won't. He got off with a slap on the wrist. I agree with judge no person was injured by his actions. The state was robbed of money by paying too much rent for a building and that money could have been used for social services. The Page family maybe "generous" with their money but for most part all of it is dirty money that he obtained for sources that are not on the upright. Page is the kind of lawyer that gives lawyers a bad name. He paid off this judge like he has many other tine and walked away. Does he still have his license. I believe so. Hire him to get you confiscated drug money back. He will. It will cost you.

  5. I remain amazed at the level of expertise of the average Internet Television Executive. Obviously they have all the answers and know the business inside and out.

ADVERTISEMENT