Indiana House Dems lose political hot-button

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana  Gov. Mitch Daniels' decision to rescind strict new security procedures at the Statehouse took the heat off him and his administration at the start of what was already guaranteed to be a raucous 2012 session. But it also deprived Indiana's House Democrats a major political tool they could have used in their continuing boycott of a divisive labor bill.

Indiana's House Democrats' ardent opposition to the Republican right-to-work measure seemed to flag Friday as they entered their third day of boycotting the House. The measure bars businesses and private unions from mandating that workers pay union fees and has become a proxy for the national battles between Democrats and Republicans and organized labor and business.

A few days before the 2012 session kicked off this week, state safety officials announced they would place a 3,000-person limit on the number of people who could be in the Statehouse at any time and keep protesters from bringing in large signs, bullhorns and other gear. They called it a safety precaution for people in a building which had never had an occupancy limit placed on it before. Union leaders and Democrats called it a move to stifle public opposition to the divisive labor bill.

Most Democrats say they've already benefited from the blunder. But some also admit that if Daniels had dug his heels in they would have benefited more. Rep. Vanessa Summers, D-Indianapolis, said she felt like the bad publicity forced Daniels' hand, but that it still would have been easier for Democrats to keep fighting

"We could have had the rat here," Summers said, referring to the giant inflatable rat seen at many union protests.

Daniels rescinded the new measures just hours before lawmakers began the 2012 session of the Indiana General Assembly. Hundreds of union protesters packed the building on the first day of session and many more snaked around the side of the building waiting to get in.

While standing by his public safety officials and their assessment, he added that he did not want to curb public access from the start of the session.

"We should err on the side of openness and hope there's not a problem," Daniels said. "If one develops, then we'll look at that."

Rolling back the new access rules back was the best thing Daniels could have done, said Andy Downs, director of the Mike Downs Center for Indiana Politics.

"It was good from a PR standpoint in terms of media outlets and what they think," he said. "I also think it took an issue of the table so Democrats weren't able to use that as another reason to get riled up. Although they seem to have a long enough list that taking that off the table doesn't seem to change things that much."

House Democrats meanwhile are hoping that a political stigma has now been attached to the 2012 session. Rep. Charlie Brown, D-Gary, said he thinks the political damage itself can't be rescinded.

"Even Ray Charles could see that was directed at minimizing the movement's presence," he said.


  • The "protective" screening process prevents entry
    While Mitch may have changed the physical limit, the security process....single line, only one entry door, bag search, required photo, and very slow guards (guards are union?) worked very well at keeping us out in the cold in long lines until after the event. Mitch is slick---Mitch's elitist business owner friends will get to cut wages. Mitch is for business and strongly against Hoosier workers wanting to make a liveable wage.

  • Pat doesn’t represent our generation
    Its so true! Pat Bauer and the rest of the tools we elected to speak for our party need to sit down and be quiet! You make me sick that I voted for you. And you cant seem to see that no matter what laws we have on the books in Indiana if WE THE PEOPLE want to organize they cant stop us. No on can. I am not afraid to loose my right to bargain because I am an American and you cant take that away. The only thing that seems like it might be close to loosing is some kind of kickbacks or payoffs. I mean why would the politicians be squealing so hard? I’m not loosing my rights here, nether are any other Hoosier. So what’s the problem Pat?? You need learn you don’t speak for our generation. You don’t speak for all of us. Shame on you for fouling our party.
  • republicans
    you dont have to worry i was watching a show on sunday and it was here in Indiana.. and the republicans said right to work is a done deal and it cant be repealed until the dem's
    take over and that wont happen.. so you see we the people of indiana have NO VOICE

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By the way, the right to work law is intended to prevent forced union membership, not as a way to keep workers in bondage as you make it sound, Italiano. If union leadership would spend all of their funding on the workers, who they are supposed to be representing, instead of trying to buy political favor and living lavish lifestyles as a result of the forced membership, this law would never had been necessary.

  2. Unions once served a noble purpose before greed and apathy took over. Now most unions are just as bad or even worse than the ills they sought to correct. I don't believe I have seen a positive comment posted by you. If you don't like the way things are done here, why do you live here? It would seem a more liberal environment like New York or California would suit you better?

  3. just to clear it up... Straight No Chaser is an a capella group that formed at IU. They've toured nationally typically doing a capella arangements of everything from Old Songbook Standards to current hits on the radio.

  4. This surprises you? Mayor Marine pulled the same crap whenhe levered the assets of the water co up by half a billion $$$ then he created his GRAFTER PROGRAM called REBUILDINDY. That program did not do anything for the Ratepayors Water Infrastructure Assets except encumber them and FORCE invitable higher water and sewer rates on Ratepayors to cover debt coverage on the dough he stole FROM THE PUBLIC TRUST. The guy is morally bankrupt to the average taxpayer and Ratepayor.

  5. There is no developer on the planet that isn't aware of what their subcontractors are doing (or not doing). They hire construction superintendents. They have architects and engineers on site to observe construction progress. If your subcontractor wasn't doing their job, you fire them and find someone who will. If people wonder why more condos aren't being built, developers like Kosene & Kosene are the reason. I am glad the residents were on the winning end after a long battle.