IBJNews

Indiana House OKs looser rules on selling old schools

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

School districts would get a break on how long they have to hold onto their vacant buildings as possible charter school sites under a measure the Indiana House approved Monday.

Legislators proposed the changes after two school districts in the Fort Wayne area ran into legal troubles trying to sell unused buildings even though no charter school operators wanted them.

The House voted 98-0 in favor of cutting the current four-year waiting period to two years and allowing a fast-track, 30-day period for selling a closed school. The bill now goes to the Senate, which already is considering a similar measure.

The 2011 law on the sale of unused schools was sponsored by Republican House Speaker Brian Bosma, who said the intent was to address situations in which public school districts were purposely refusing to sell buildings to charter schools to avoid competition.

Rep. Matthew Lehman, R-Berne, said he sponsored the changes because the four-year waiting period was too long since the school districts faced spending thousands of dollars to maintain the vacant buildings.

The bill would allow school districts with an interested buyer to seek a waiver from the state Department of Education on the two-year waiting period. The department would then give a 30-day window for a charter school operator to claim the building by giving notice to the state charter schools association and charter school sponsors, including the Indiana Charter Schools Board, Ball State University and the Indianapolis mayor's office.

Any charter school wanting to take over a vacant building would have to have a plan to start using it for classroom instruction within a year.

House Minority Leader Scott Pelath, D-Michigan City, said the bill improves what he believes is a bad current law that allows privately operated charter schools to take over public property for $1.

"I wish we would repeal the whole thing, but I do believe this bill makes it substantially better," Pelath said.

An Allen County judge ruled against the current law in December, finding that the waiting period didn't change other laws on how school districts can sell property and forced districts to incur unnecessary costs.

The Indiana Public Charter Schools Association had challenged the Fort Wayne Community Schools' plan to sell an unused elementary school building to the county airport board and the East Allen County district's attempt to sell a vacant school to the Fort Wayne-South Bend Catholic Diocese.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Another Example of Failing to Protect the Taxpayers First
    Being a wealth-worshiping state, it's not surprising that the Indiana Republican super-majority would do everything possible to help privateers make a profit, including at the taxpayers' expense. These school buidings are worth more than $1.00 each, and the money paid to privateers is taken from public school budgets. Privateer-run schools do not necessarily do better than public schools, and after they get comfortable with making a profit, they'll cut back on quality teachers, and the problems with just re-surface. This is wrong.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT