Indiana: Medicaid patients' choice not unlimited

Associated Press
June 24, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Medicaid patients don't have unlimited rights to choose medical providers, the state of Indiana said Friday in defending its decision to cut off funding to Planned Parenthood because it offers abortions.

Planned Parenthood and the federal government have said the state's action limits Medicaid recipients' health care options, but the state insisted it is just enforcing federal rules that restrict funding for the procedure.

The state's arguments came in response to a June 16 U.S. Justice Department brief siding with Planned Parenthood in its request for a court order blocking as unconstitutional a tough new Indiana abortion law that disqualifies Planned Parenthood of Indiana from the Medicaid program because it provides the procedure.

In its 17-page response, Indiana argued states have the same power to deny Medicaid payments to providers as the federal government. It also said the law mirrors federal restrictions on abortion funding in most cases.

"Even if States may not directly target free choice as such, they may incidentally burden free choice with restrictions aimed at other, legitimate objectives," the state said.

Planned Parenthood of Indiana has been without Medicaid funding since the law took effect May 10. The group stopped seeing Medicaid patients this week after private donations that had paid those patients' bills ran out.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt has said she intends to rule by July 1.

Justice Department attorneys said Pratt should grant Planned Parenthood's request for an injunction because the law restricts Medicaid recipients' freedom to choose their health care provider.

Pratt gave Planned Parenthood until 6 p.m. Friday to file its own response to the expected state brief.


  • not everyone...
    I know I as a women and a Democrat dont! I think it is very good way to show the people of this country what a good government steward looks like! One of the fundamental rights to defend as a Democrat is that government shall not supersede the will of the people! The movement works for us and in Indiana as it stands today, right here and now the majority has spoken and we simple have to accept it. As much as larger national groups would like us to scream in outrage over the horrendous atrocities about to happen to the women of this state. They do not live here. They do not own the residents of this state and there for do not tell me or you how to run our lives. Being a Democrat in Indiana is a double edged sword and some times we get cut! But this is the way it is. It is a law and I thank Governor Daniels for at least standing up for his beliefs and that of the people who voted for him!
  • all we are saying is give peas a chance
    The state of Indiana has every right to honor its commitment to the tax payers who elected officials to get this done. The federal government has no right to tell the tax payers of Indiana what they can and can not fund! We should limit what we the people of Indiana want to pay for! Its our money and they work for us! And those doctors are paid for with our tax dollars. I would suggest that if someone has issue with this law then show the heck up at the polls and do something about it. Before Indiana bankrupts the aclu.
  • Tempest in a Teapot
    This is a ridiculous fight. Medicaid patients are supposed to choose a primary care doctor from whom they can get these services. Women can even choose a gynecologist for primary care and would thus get better care than at PP. Also, if the Federal government's argument that Medicaid patients should be able to go to any doctor they choose is true then why do Medicaid patients with mental issues have to go to clinics and group therapy because so few psychiatrists take Medicaid?
  • planned parenthood
    Our governor, and the republicans running ourgovernment,should all resign.These people need the planned parent money, offered by the federal government. Our governor doesn"t have the right to decide, and dictate where that money goes.
  • Unplanned parenthood
    The safest place for a baby until it is born should be in its mothers womb.
  • No Choice/No Voice
    Last I remember, Daniels was a man. He has no woman health issues to deal with. I'm pretty sure that he has enough money to pay for his families health issues when they occur. Daniels, you've just said outloud exactly what has irked me about the Old Boys club Republicans(I don't mean all of the Party, just some), "Women are to be seen and not heard" Sadly, women also voted Daniels into office. I'm sure they regret that decision now.
  • Keep them downtrodden
    Way to go Indiana. These poor people need to be kept in their place. Lets make certain they live by the moral laws we set and have lots of unwanted children that they can't support. After all we need a next generation of peons to serve those of us with the money.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Kent's done a good job of putting together some good guests, intelligence and irreverence without the inane chatter of the other two shows. JMV is unlistenable, mostly because he doesn't do his homework and depends on non-sports stuff to keep HIM interested. Query and Shultz is a bit better, but lack of prep in their show certainly is evident. Sterling obviously workes harder than the other shows. We shall see if there is any way for a third signal with very little successful recent history to make it. I always say you have to give a show two years to grow into what it will become...

  2. Lafayette Square, Washington Square should be turned into office parks with office buildings, conversion, no access to the public at all. They should not be shopping malls and should be under tight security and used for professional offices instead of havens for crime. Their only useage is to do this or tear them down and replace them with high rise office parks with secured parking lots so that the crime in the areas is not allowed in. These are prime properties, but must be reused for other uses, professional office conversions with no loitering and no shopping makes sense, otherwise they have become hangouts long ago for gangs, groups of people who have no intent of spending money, and are only there for trouble and possibly crime, shoplifting, etc. I worked summers at SuperX Drugs in Lafayette Square in the 1970s and even then the shrinkage from shoplifting was 10-15 percent. No sense having shopping malls in these areas, they earn no revenue, attract crime, and are a blight on the city. All malls that are not of use should be repurposed or torn down by the city, condemned. One possibility would be to repourpose them as inside college campuses or as community centers, but then again, if the community is high crime, why bother.

  3. Straight No Chaser

  4. Seems the biggest use of TIF is for pet projects that improve Quality Of Life, allegedly, but they ignore other QOL issues that are of a more important and urgent nature. Keep it transparent and try not to get in ready, fire, Aim! mode. You do realize that business the Mayor said might be interested is probably going to want TIF too?

  5. Gary, I'm in complete agreement. The private entity should be required to pay IPL, and, if City parking meters are involved, the parking meter company. I was just pointing out how the poorly-structured parking meter deal affected the car share deal.