More than 1,000 Indiana teachers swarmed the Indiana Statehouse Tuesday for a rowdy rally denouncing the sweeping education
proposals moving through the Republican-dominated state House and Senate.
Teachers said they felt disrespected by Gov. Mitch Daniels and state Superintendent Tony Bennett, both Republicans, who have
pushed to restrict teacher collective bargaining, tie teacher salaries with student performance and create vouchers that would
direct taxpayer money to private schools. Teachers said GOP leaders want to erode funding for traditional public schools and
run schools like a business.
"Teachers have raised these concerns over and over again to this administration," said Matt Carroll, who teaches
English at Mishawaka High School in northern Indiana. "We feel like every reason we have, every bit of experience we
have is being totally ignored."
It was certainly hard to ignore cheering teachers Tuesday as they filled a second-floor atrium, lined Statehouse staircases
and peered over balconies from the third and fourth floors. One teacher carried a sign reading "save public education
from Tony the Terminator and Mitch the Knife." Tipton County art teacher James Huntley painted a caricature of Daniels
with "education sell-out" stamped on his forehead.
"He wants to privatize schools," Huntley said of Daniels.
Teachers around the state already have raised complaints about the governor's agenda in local meetings, letters-to-the-editor
and other forums, but Tuesday's rally allowed them share their opinions directly — and loudly— with lawmakers
gathered in Indianapolis for the 2011 legislative session.
Dozens of teachers packed the House gallery and lined the chambers' windows as lawmakers debated a bill aimed at expanding
charter schools, which are public schools free of certain regulations and, often, union contracts. Many minority Democrats
seized the chance for a friendly audience and made fiery speeches railing against the bill and other parts of Daniels'
education agenda.
Teachers cheered on opponents and booed supporters. They made so much noise that a House leader asked them at least twice
to quiet down so the debate could be heard.
The House eventually approved the charter school proposal on a 59-37 mostly party-line vote.
Republicans who support Daniels' proposals said the extensive changes are meant to reform Indiana's education system
and make students — not teachers or their unions — the top priority.
"As always, the union's demand is more money, no change," Daniels said in a written statement. "Their
priority is their organization, not the young people of Indiana."
Bennett said good teachers have nothing to worry about.
"Fear breeds these empty suspicions that there is some conspiracy to destroy public education," Bennett said. "My
goal — and what I believe we are doing — is advancing an agenda that is pro-child, but also will save and preserve
public education."
State Republican Party Chairman Eric Holcomb said the Indiana State Teachers Association spends millions each year on political
campaigns and efforts such as Tuesday's rally to "defend policies that treat ineffective teachers no differently
than outstanding teachers."
"The hundreds of professional educators lobbying at the Statehouse today represent hundreds not in the classroom,"
Holcomb said in a written statement.
Indiana State Teachers Association President Nate Schnellenberger said the union hasn't held a rally in years and that
teachers felt they had to speak out this year.
"They absolutely feel that not only are they being attacked, but public education is being attacked — unjustly,"
Schnellenberger said.

















IBJ Conversations
22 Comments
Add Comment
MTECH COMPUTER
Assume that the average elementary school teacher has a class of 25 and has them for 180 days, six and a half hours per day. If we were to hire a childcare worker at the abysmal rate of $5 per hour to care for 25 kids for six and a half hours per day for 180 days, that person would earn $146,250 a
year. This comes without any teaching. Now, and only now, can we talk about
merit pay. The public school teacher in Indiana must have a bachelor's degree and is
more than adequately trained to teach his/her subject (this degree having cost from $60,000 to $120,000). Teachers throw in
expert instruction and work far more than the
six and a half hours per day for which they are paid. If Dr. Bennett has such little faith in the performance of Indiana's teachers that he advocates the hiring of unlicensed persons to teach, I hope that he will only use the services of health care givers who are unlicensed.
It is precisely because of persons in power who have the mindset of this politician that
I would not even think of teaching without
union membership.
Before you jump to conclusions, I'm not a teacher. All three of my children, however, have graduated from traditional public schools and have gone on to public universities.
I believe our very democracy is founded and its future rests on the existence of our public school system. Someone once described America's public school system as the greatest weapon our country has against our enemies, foreign or domestic. Now, I am witnessing the Rs I once had so much respect for systematically dismantling that great weapon!
I am dismayed at how the general public has heard the lie that our public schools are failing so many times that it is now accepted as a truth. From what I see, our public schools are doing better than ever before, with less resources than they've had in the past, and with more diverse and challenging students than ever before.
Or, even if the lie is true--our public schools are failing, let's look at what the Rs are doing. They are taking scarce public tax dollars away from our traditional public schools and giving them to their cronies to run charter schools where only half of the teachers are required (if one of the current bills becomes law) to have teachers' licenses. And where will this take us? It'll result in public schools getting worse and, based on the data I've seen, the limited number of students who go to charter schools finding out the hard way that the charter schools are failing at an even greater rate than the public schools.
I just saw a report that said if Indiana was a country, the performance of our public school's 4th and 8th graders on standardized tests would rank Hoosier children 7th in the world! That's failure? You've got to be kidding.
That's not to say that our public schools can't and shouldn't get better. I'd like them to be number one in the world! But, they'll never get there with a governor and his followers hammering on teachers day in and day out and finding ways to move public tax dollars away from traditional public schools and into the coffers of their business cronies. If this outrage does not end, I hope public school teachers by the tens of thousands come to the State House the next time to exercise their right to advocate for their students and their profession.
Just as I'd rather have a painful operation to eliminate a cancer quickly than to suffer from that disease for a long period of time, I'd rather have Hoosier students go without their teachers for a day or two now, then to suffer for generations to come because the governor and his followers made public school teaching so unattractive that no one of any worth would enter it.
When I was in law school, one of my professors planted a thought in my mind that stays with me when I see people doing the kind of damage the Rs are presently doing...A little bit of knowledge is a very dangerous thing.
The governor, state superitendent (ex-football coach with less than 1 year as a local school superintendent, I believe), and their followers know a little bit about education--but not nearly enough. Yet, they cut off the voice of teachers who do know a lot about education. That is a very dangerous thing--for Hoosier students.
Finally, I'm all for non-public schools, too. I want them to exist and succeed because the better they do, the more challenged public schools will be and that's good for students no matter which kind of school they are in. I just don't want my tax dollars doing anything except to keep public schools as financially healthy as humanly possible.
Teachers already support accountability and it has been federal law and state law for years. Our schools are already held accountable on behalf of our students ISTEP and now end of course assessments. The prevailing thought is that by opening up a charter school down the street from the school that I teach at that our test scores will rise. There is no logic in that.
The collective bargaining argument is also flawed. In my disctrict we have taken no pay raises and taken cuts in benefits for several years in a row now not becuase we were made to but because we had to do our part to help our district survive financially. We had to cut over $3 million from our budgets and at the same time do our jobs better. I am guessing that Rich had a pay raise in the last three years. Would Rich sacrifice pay raises and benefits for the good of the company?
Rich talks about having courage to explore new ways of meeting the educational needs of Indiana's children... Sir, you have never stepped foot in my classroom. How in the world would you know what I or 1,000's of other teachers are doing in their classrooms. As a matter of fact, this legislation and the entire educational agenda set forth by Gov. Daniels will do just the opposite. For the youth of this state to grow to their potential they need more than science, english and math. But when this agenda is realized, technology, mucis, art, physical education and all other electives will be shed from the public school system.
I was personally educated in a private school from another state. Here is where 99% of those against these bills are completely off base. Yes 98% of my classmates graduated and all but 1 went on to college for at least a semester. But those had nothing to do with the fact I was taught by teachers willing to make less money and with no collective bargaining. The difference between public and private schools lies directly in the homes of the students. Private school parents take a much bigger and active role in their childrens education. In my years of teaching I only see an average of 24% of my students parents on conference night. The average grade of those students in 86%. Trying to make contact with parents that do not take an interest in their children's education is the most difficult part of my job.
Let's take a quick look at the teaching profession vs. others like Rich. Teachers are licensed and one of the few professions that require a license. To maintain our license we are required to maintain a record of continual education. That means college credit. We are required to partipate in professional development every year in our schools. These are not complaints as I am a big believer in the value of continuing to learn regardless of profession.
What I dislike is people that don't have a clue what I do and what my peers do but have these completely off-base and negative thoughts about me and the job I am doing.
My advice is for people like Rich to have the courage to research before they make judgements on the job that I do. You have no idea how I feel about my students or my job.
I continually have to prove through evaluation and education that I am not only qualified but "highly qualified" to perform my job. You see, qualified doesn't cut it. According to state law we have to be highly qualified.
Thanks for your support of education. It is with discussions like this that we might be able to move education forward. At least people on this discussion care regardless of the side they take. We can make education better with discussion.
My biggest issue with my profession right now is that yes we don't want these bills. What alternative are we as teacher (and more specifically the teachers union) offering. I see none. Say don't vote for these bills is not enough in my mind. We need to offer an alternative. Unfortunately that is not how politics works right now but that is changing.
Again, I do thank you all for your support.
Grade: F. If they're local teachers. Move 1-2 hours of driving time any direction and they had to take time from the classrooms -and- their families. Care for a retest?
There is absolutely no accountability, no wage parity with the private sector and the benefit levels are unsustainable. Private sector unions at least have some incentive to cooperate because if they don't the employer goes broke or moves offshore.
Public sector union workers do not have to compete with other providers of the same product (in this case education), and only get fired if they do something that makes the front page.
The failure of the public sector to compete and innovate is the reason state and local governments are going broke, and the basis of civil unrest, even riots in places like France and Greece. There's a great article about this in a recent issue of The Economist.
You object to Highly Qualified Teachers (as defined by IDOE leaving their classrooms for half a day to lobby their government for redress of greviences, a right guaranteed in our Constitution. If this legislation goes through, Indiana children will be in charter school which will allow 50% of their teachers to be unlicensed. It is a grave concern.
Please, Travis, give the teachers of Indiana some of those "thousand ways" we could have gained attention.
I am married to a public school teacher (who is not a member of the ISTA because she is opposed to a seniority-based system) and can assure you that the majority of teachers care deeply about the young people of Indiana. I donâ??t know many fields where college-educated professionals (many of whom have advanced degrees) are paid at the level of our teachers. And, for those of you that think this pay is fair given that they only work 6 hours a day, 10 months of the yearâ?¦let me assure you that the vast majority of teachers work well over 40 hours per week and many work through the summers preparing for the next school year.
Public education unions are not the answer. They do not create an environment where high potential teachers are given challenging opportunities nor where high performance teachers are rewarded. The best way to remove teachers unions is to pay our teachers equitably. Keep in mind, ISTA dues in 2010 were $651 per year (money that most teachers would prefer to keep).
While Governor Daniels is spinning the legislature to look as though the teachers are money hungry, the fact of the matter is that Daniels is making an attempt to cut into the safety of teaching jobs and even make schools into a business. Do your realise that current plans state that any school without 100% of students passing the ISTEP by 2013 is considered failing, and if they fail 3 years in a row they may be bought out by a charter school for $1? Teachers aren't allowed to say "We can't get every single student to pass." because it makes them sound like the bad guys and that they are giving up, when in actuality you can lead a horse to water but you cannot make him drink. If more of the public knew some of the more drastic parts of Bennett's plans, maybe people would understand why my favorite teacher was rallying on Tuesday for the sake of saving the teaching profession. Because of Bennett's plans, I no longer want to be a teacher... please just consider that statement.
Brandon