IBJNews

Ballard vetoes council's redistricting proposal

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The debate over Indianapolis City-County Council districts may need to be resolved in court, council President Maggie Lewis predicted Friday, after Mayor Greg Ballard vetoed an ordinance that would have funded redistricting.

The Democrat-controlled council was seeking $180,000 to redraw lines that the outgoing, Republican-led council approved in December. The mayor, a Republican, approved the redrawn districts on Jan. 1, 2012.

"The City-County Council legally and fairly redistricted earlier this year,” Ballard said in a statement issued after his veto on Friday afternoon. “As the city works to erase an estimated $47 million budget shortfall for 2013, this proposal was an unnecessary expenditure of taxpayer money."

Lewis said the council is pushing the issue because state law requires redistricting in the year after new Census data is released. She believes the mayor’s signing off on new maps, which don’t reflect the latest data, fails to fulfill that requirement.

Lewis said she plans to reach out to the not-for-profit Common Cause for technical assistance on creating new boundaries. If the mayor rejects the result of that work, the issue probably will land in court, she said.

Will the partisan divide on redistricting spill into other city issues?

Lewis said she’s trying to avoid escalation. “I don’t want to go tit for tat,” she said. “I want to be a partner with the administration. I don’t want to not move our city forward over the next four years.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Veto Pen...
    Well put Amy. I would say the same. I so love it when the mayor veto's the rediculous moves of the council.
  • Let's Pay for More Political Hoohah
    City County Council: You are wasting time and taxpayer money. Get to work on something that benefits everyone in the county, not just Center Twp.
  • The Law
    The fact is the law is crystal clear in requiring the Council to redistrict the second year after the census. That would be 2012. The lame duck redistricting, while not illegal, gets wiped away by the law which requires redistricting it in 2012. It's a shame this is going to end up in Court, but it surely will. The courts will probably end up redrawing the districts like they did last time.
  • Mrs.
    Keep that Veto pen out, Mayor Ballard. This council is keeping this stuff coming. In fact, get a refill.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Cramer agrees...says don't buy it and sell it if you own it! Their "pay to play" cost is this issue. As long as they charge customers, they never will attain the critical mass needed to be a successful on company...Jim Cramer quote.

    2. My responses to some of the comments would include the following: 1. Our offer which included the forgiveness of debt (this is an immediate forgiveness and is not "spread over many years")represents debt that due to a reduction of interest rates in the economy arguably represents consideration together with the cash component of our offer that exceeds the $2.1 million apparently offered by another party. 2. The previous $2.1 million cash offer that was turned down by the CRC would have netted the CRC substantially less than $2.1 million. As a result even in hindsight the CRC was wise in turning down that offer. 3. With regard to "concerned Carmelite's" discussion of the previous financing Pedcor gave up $16.5 million in City debt in addition to the conveyance of the garage (appraised at $13 million)in exchange for the $22.5 million cash and debt obligations. The local media never discussed the $16.5 million in debt that we gave up which would show that we gave $29.5 million in value for the $23.5 million. 4.Pedcor would have been much happier if Brian was still operating his Deli and only made this offer as we believe that we can redevelop the building into something that will be better for the City and City Center where both Pedcor the citizens of Carmel have a large investment. Bruce Cordingley, President, Pedcor

    3. I've been looking for news on Corner Bakery, too, but there doesn't seem to be any info out there. I prefer them over Panera and Paradise so can't wait to see where they'll be!

    4. WGN actually is two channels: 1. WGN Chicago, seen only in Chicago (and parts of Canada) - this station is one of the flagship CW affiliates. 2. WGN America - a nationwide cable channel that doesn't carry any CW programming, and doesn't have local affiliates. (In addition, as WGN is owned by Tribune, just like WTTV, WTTK, and WXIN, I can't imagine they would do anything to help WISH.) In Indianapolis, CW programming is already seen on WTTV 4 and WTTK 29, and when CBS takes over those stations' main channels, the CW will move to a sub channel, such as 4.2 or 4.3 and 29.2 or 29.3. TBS is only a cable channel these days and does not affiliate with local stations. WISH could move the MyNetwork affiliation from WNDY 23 to WISH 8, but I am beginning to think they may prefer to put together their own lineup of syndicated programming instead. While much of it would be "reruns" from broadcast or cable, that's pretty much what the MyNetwork does these days anyway. So since WISH has the choice, they may want to customize their lineup by choosing programs that they feel will garner better ratings in this market.

    5. The Pedcor debt is from the CRC paying ~$23M for the Pedcor's parking garage at City Center that is apprased at $13M. Why did we pay over the top money for a private businesses parking? What did we get out of it? Pedcor got free parking for their apartment and business tenants. Pedcor now gets another building for free that taxpayers have ~$3M tied up in. This is NOT a win win for taxpayers. It is just a win for Pedcor who contributes heavily to the Friends of Jim Brainard. The campaign reports are on the Hamilton County website. http://www2.hamiltoncounty.in.gov/publicdocs/Campaign%20Finance%20Images/defaultfiles.asp?ARG1=Campaign Finance Images&ARG2=/Brainard, Jim

    ADVERTISEMENT