IBJNews

Ballard vetoes council's redistricting proposal

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The debate over Indianapolis City-County Council districts may need to be resolved in court, council President Maggie Lewis predicted Friday, after Mayor Greg Ballard vetoed an ordinance that would have funded redistricting.

The Democrat-controlled council was seeking $180,000 to redraw lines that the outgoing, Republican-led council approved in December. The mayor, a Republican, approved the redrawn districts on Jan. 1, 2012.

"The City-County Council legally and fairly redistricted earlier this year,” Ballard said in a statement issued after his veto on Friday afternoon. “As the city works to erase an estimated $47 million budget shortfall for 2013, this proposal was an unnecessary expenditure of taxpayer money."

Lewis said the council is pushing the issue because state law requires redistricting in the year after new Census data is released. She believes the mayor’s signing off on new maps, which don’t reflect the latest data, fails to fulfill that requirement.

Lewis said she plans to reach out to the not-for-profit Common Cause for technical assistance on creating new boundaries. If the mayor rejects the result of that work, the issue probably will land in court, she said.

Will the partisan divide on redistricting spill into other city issues?

Lewis said she’s trying to avoid escalation. “I don’t want to go tit for tat,” she said. “I want to be a partner with the administration. I don’t want to not move our city forward over the next four years.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Veto Pen...
    Well put Amy. I would say the same. I so love it when the mayor veto's the rediculous moves of the council.
  • Let's Pay for More Political Hoohah
    City County Council: You are wasting time and taxpayer money. Get to work on something that benefits everyone in the county, not just Center Twp.
  • The Law
    The fact is the law is crystal clear in requiring the Council to redistrict the second year after the census. That would be 2012. The lame duck redistricting, while not illegal, gets wiped away by the law which requires redistricting it in 2012. It's a shame this is going to end up in Court, but it surely will. The courts will probably end up redrawing the districts like they did last time.
  • Mrs.
    Keep that Veto pen out, Mayor Ballard. This council is keeping this stuff coming. In fact, get a refill.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

    2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

    3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

    4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

    5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

    ADVERTISEMENT