IBJNews

Ballard vetoes council's redistricting proposal

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The debate over Indianapolis City-County Council districts may need to be resolved in court, council President Maggie Lewis predicted Friday, after Mayor Greg Ballard vetoed an ordinance that would have funded redistricting.

The Democrat-controlled council was seeking $180,000 to redraw lines that the outgoing, Republican-led council approved in December. The mayor, a Republican, approved the redrawn districts on Jan. 1, 2012.

"The City-County Council legally and fairly redistricted earlier this year,” Ballard said in a statement issued after his veto on Friday afternoon. “As the city works to erase an estimated $47 million budget shortfall for 2013, this proposal was an unnecessary expenditure of taxpayer money."

Lewis said the council is pushing the issue because state law requires redistricting in the year after new Census data is released. She believes the mayor’s signing off on new maps, which don’t reflect the latest data, fails to fulfill that requirement.

Lewis said she plans to reach out to the not-for-profit Common Cause for technical assistance on creating new boundaries. If the mayor rejects the result of that work, the issue probably will land in court, she said.

Will the partisan divide on redistricting spill into other city issues?

Lewis said she’s trying to avoid escalation. “I don’t want to go tit for tat,” she said. “I want to be a partner with the administration. I don’t want to not move our city forward over the next four years.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Veto Pen...
    Well put Amy. I would say the same. I so love it when the mayor veto's the rediculous moves of the council.
  • Let's Pay for More Political Hoohah
    City County Council: You are wasting time and taxpayer money. Get to work on something that benefits everyone in the county, not just Center Twp.
  • The Law
    The fact is the law is crystal clear in requiring the Council to redistrict the second year after the census. That would be 2012. The lame duck redistricting, while not illegal, gets wiped away by the law which requires redistricting it in 2012. It's a shame this is going to end up in Court, but it surely will. The courts will probably end up redrawing the districts like they did last time.
  • Mrs.
    Keep that Veto pen out, Mayor Ballard. This council is keeping this stuff coming. In fact, get a refill.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. "This was a very localized, Indiana issue," he said. As in, Indiana failed to expand Medicaid to cover its poor citizens resulting in the loss of essential medical services, including this EMS company. Well done, Indiana GOP. Here are the real death panels: GOP state governments who refuse to expand Medicaid for political reasons.

    2. In the "one for all, all for none" socialist doctrine the sick die...this plus obama"care" equates to caucasian genocide plus pushed flight to cities thus further eroding the conservative base and the continualed spiral toward complete liberal/progressive/marxist America.

    3. There is a simple reason why WISH is not reporting on this story. LIN has others stations in different markets that are affiliated with CBS. Reporting about CBS blindsiding WISH/LIN due to CBS's greed and bullying tatics would risk any future negoations LIN will have with CBS in other markets.

    4. My best always! Dave Wilson

    5. How did Columbus, Ohio pull off a car share service without a single dollar of public subsidies? They must not have a mayor who is on the take like Indianapolis. Daimler Benz offers Columbus residents their Smart Cars on a market-driven basis: "This has some neat features. Cars don’t have to be picked up and dropped off at fixed points. You find one with your smart phone based on GPS, and drop it off anywhere in the service area you can find a spot – even at a meter. These cars aren’t required to feed the meter so you get free on street parking while using them. I was told this system was put in place on a market basis without subsidies – and that the vendor actually pays the city for the use of the meters." http://www.urbanophile.com/2014/05/26/checking-in-on-columbus/

    ADVERTISEMENT