IBJNews

  • Home

Indy loses promising health startup

J.K. Wall
November 12, 2012
Keywords
Health Care, Health Care & Insurance, Health Care & Life Sciences, Health Care Businesses, Life Science & Biotech, Medical Research, Pharmaceutical, Relocation, Small Business, Startup
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indianapolis would probably like to have this one back.

LabDoor, which formed here in the spring, moved last month to San Francisco after it was picked as part of the latest class of startups to be housed in the Rock Health seed accelerator for digital health companies.

LabDoor soon will launch an iPhone app that pulls from clinical trials and independent experts to immediately assign an A-F grade for vitamins and over-the-counter medicines. The grade, based on safety, efficacy and price information, is generated by scanning the label on a box or jar in the pharmacy aisle.

As part of its acceptance by Rock Health, LabDoor will receive $100,000 in startup funding from a group of venture capitslists, which include Silicon Valley behemoth Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers.

Perhaps even more importantly, Rock Health works with a constellation of other health companies and venture capitalists, including Kaiser, The Mayo Clinic, Mohr Davidow Ventures, Aberdare Ventures, General Electric Corp., Genentech, United Healthcare, the University of California at San Francisco and Harvard Medical School.

Those connections will be hugely helpful as LabDoor tries to bring its product to consumers, said Tercio “T.J.” Junker, the firm's chief operating officer.

The LabDoor team now consists of just four principals: CEO Neil Thanedar, Chief Technology Officer Helton Souza, Chief Creative Officer Rafael Ferreira and Junker.

Members of the LabDoor management team said it was a tough decision to leave Indianapolis, but that the opportunity in San Francisco was too good to pass up.

“The Indy startup scene is definitely on the rise, but is years away from being a true startup hub,” Thanedar said in an interview published Nov. 1 on nibletz.com. “Most startup cities grow in a predictable way: Startups form organically, a few hit big financial exits, creating angel investors who support the next generation of startups. We’ve seen the exits (IPOs for Angie’s List and ExactTarget). The next set of startups are ready to grow, they just need the early capital to succeed.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Dreamapolis Accelerator hurry up
    Jaron GarrettNovember 16, 2012 2:45 PM
    Indianapolis is a hub for entrepreneurship and growing still everyday. I wish LabDoor the best, but they are still one of many promising start-ups that have left to find investment elsewhere. The question should be...how many more are we willing to lose.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • no hard feelings
    JoeNovember 14, 2012 9:53 AM
    I've heard of them. I don't think he meant it in a bad way. The fact that Indy is not Silicon Valley doesn't mean that Indy is bad or not getting better. My guess is that money didn’t play a key role in their move (you don't move to SF for $100K), but the fact that it would be harder for them to recruit highly skilled people if they stayed. That doesn't mean they might not consider a move back once they are more established (i.e. have easier time attracting talent) and start looking to lower cost. Now, I’m not sure this is a “blow” to Indy. They are a small start-up with somewhat limited potential (from what I gathered about their app idea).
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • What. The. What?
    Kristian AndersenNovember 14, 2012 8:57 AM
    For ghe record, I like Neil but I'm not sure what his comments are rooted in. "Indy is year's away from being a true startup hub?" "Lack of early capital?". I know for a fact that Gravity Ventures invited them to pitch - and they told us that they didn't need to raise money. I also know that Neil came to Indy from Michigan, built his team here, and launched his company here. Something must be working. I'm all about following the opportunity and I wish Labdoor the best but, like Chris indicated in his comment, their departure is no reflection of the vibrancy of the Indy startup scene. Kristian Andersen Kristian.vc Indymade.com
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • Who did they talk to?
    Chris BaggottNovember 13, 2012 12:59 PM
    I wonder who these guys talked to? Are they saying they were turned down by anyone here? I've not heard of them and don't know of anyone in the Angel community that has? An interesting article might be to examine how many companies are leaving because they find greener funding pastures elsewhere and point out who turned them down & perhaps compare it to the number that are actually getting started. It's a disappointing spin on this story to once again put the blame on Indy as if we are not world class in some respect. We don't need to be embarrassed about anything here as it relates to a fertile environment for startups. Indianapolis is the envy of most of our peers and we should be doing a better job of recruiting the many San Francisco startups who are fed up with the high costs, high turnover and stressful lifestyle found on the coast.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

ADVANCED SEARCH
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ

  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT