Interactive Intelligence performance lifts CEO's pay

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Interactive Intelligence Inc. CEO Donald Brown saw his total compensation rise 32.4 percent in 2009, to $1.03 million, according to the company’s annual proxy statement.

Chief Financial Officer Stephen Head, whose cash bonus—like Brown’s—was tied to the software-maker’s overall performance, had a 20 percent pay increase. But the rest of Brown’s management team, whose performance-based bonuses were tied to the profitability of their direct areas of responsibility, saw their pay remain flat or fall.

Brown, 54, an Interactive Intelligence co-founder, has been president since its inception, CEO since 1995 and chairman since 1998. He earned $252,752 more than in 2008, according to the firm’s proxy, which it filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission this month.

Interactive Intelligence’s revenue grew from $121.4 million to $131.4 million last year. Meanwhile its profit increased from $4.3 million to $8.6 million. Interactive Intelligence shares soared last year, growing 169 percent to $18.45.

The majority of Brown’s pay hike came from a $500,107 cash bonus tied to the company’s overall performance. He also earned a $350,000 salary and Interactive Intelligence stock options worth $177,345. Brown had no performance bonus in 2008.

Pay for other top executives:

—CFO Head, 56, earned $616,335, up 20 percent. Head also is the company’s vice president of finance and administration, secretary and treasurer.

—Executive Vice President of Worldwide Sales Gary R. Blough, 54, earned $596,994, down 10.9 percent.

—Vice President of Customer Service Pamela J. Hynes, 48, earned $401,011, up 0.1 percent.

—Chief Marketing Officer Joseph A. Staples, 50, earned $437,501, down 1.9 percent.

IBJ uses the Associated Press formula to calculate executive pay. It gauges the value of compensation such as stock and option grants at the time they are awarded, not the time they are cashed in.

Interactive Intelligence spent $608,774 last year on board compensation for its six independent directors, 50.4 percent more than the $404,756 it spent in 2008.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

  2. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

  3. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

  4. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.

  5. No one is complaining about these jobs coming to Indianapolis. We are complaining about the need to subsidize these low wage jobs. Why do you never hear a peep from republicans and tea partiers about this type of welfare? We should only be subsidizing high wage, high skilled jobs.