J&J, Bayer fail to win U.S. OK for expanded Xarelto use

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Johnson & Johnson and Bayer AG failed to gain U.S. approval to expand the use of their blood thinner Xarelto to prevent heart attacks and strokes in patients with serious chest pain or a previous heart attack.

The Food and Drug Administration declined to clear the treatment for acute coronary syndrome in a complete response letter, New Brunswick, N.J.-based J&J said Thursday in a statement. FDA advisers voted to recommend against approval May 23 because of missing data from 1,000 patients who withdrew from a late-stage trial of the drug.

The FDA decision may benefit New York-based Pfizer Inc. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., who expect approval June 28 for their rival drug Eliquis for a common heart arrhythmia known as atrial fibrillation, said Seamus Fernandez, an analyst at Leerink Swann & Co. in Boston. The availability of Eli Lilly and Co.’s Effient and AstraZeneca Plc’s Brilinta for acute coronary syndromes may delay further FDA action on Xarelto, he said.

“The FDA may not be motivated to urgently approve Xarelto for acute coronary syndrome without greater clarity,” he wrote in a note to clients today. “Commercially, we question whether the FDA’s recommended label for Xarelto in ACS would have any advantages over Effient or Brilinta. Given each drug’s slow launch, we question Xarelto’s commercial prospects as a third-to-market option.”

J&J is confident of the drug’s benefits for patients with acute coronary syndrome, Paul Burton, of the company’s Janssen Research & Development unit, said in the statement. “We will continue to work with the FDA to fully address their questions as quickly as possible,” he said.

Acute coronary syndrome causes 1.2 million hospitalizations a year. The market for drugs to treat the condition may total more than $1 billion, according to Fernandez, who said Xarelto may eventually win approval. The delay could be as long as a year, he said.

J&J owns U.S. rights to the medicine while Leverkusen, Germany-based Bayer sells the drug in Europe.

Xarelto has been on the U.S. market since July 2011 to prevent blood clots in patients undergoing knee and hip surgeries. In November, the FDA approved the medicine to prevent strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation. The missing information in the clinical trial made it hard to interpret the data for Xarelto’s use for the wider group of heart patients, panel members said.

Almost 1,300 patients dropped out early of a 15,526-subject, final-phase study and withdrew consent for access to their health information. Researchers were able to follow up with 177 patients, confirming they were alive.

Xarelto is one of the medicines attempting to replace warfarin, a more than 50-year-old drug that requires constant monitoring and dose adjustments to keep blood from getting too thin and putting patients at risk of severe bleeding. Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH, a closely held company based in Ingelheim, Germany, won U.S. approval in 2010 to sell Pradaxa, its blood thinner to replace warfarin, for those with irregular heartbeats.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A couple of issues need some clarification especially since my name was on the list. I am not sure how this information was obtained and from where. For me, the amount was incorrect to begin with and the money does not come to me personally. I am guessing that the names listed are the Principal Investigators (individual responsible for the conduct of the trail) for the different pharmaceutical trials and not the entity which receives the checks. In my case, I participate in Phase II and Phase III trials which are required for new drug development. Your article should differentiate the amount of money received for consulting, for speaking fees, and for conduct of a clinical trial for new drug development. The lumping of all of these categories may give the reader a false impression of physicians just trying to get rich. The Sunshine Law may help to differentiate these categories in the future. The public should be aware that the Clinical Trial Industry could be a real economic driver for Indiana since these revenues supports jobs and new job creation. Nationally, this account for 10-20 billion which our State is missing out on to a large degree. Yes, new drug and technology development has gotten most of the attention (e.g. CTSI, BioCrossroads, etc.) However, serious money is being left on the table by not participating in the clinical trials to get those new drugs and medical devices on the market!!!! I guess that this is not sexy enough for academia.

  2. The address given for the Goldfish Swim Club is the Ace Hardware, is it closing?

  3. Out of state management and ownership. If Kite controlled it, everything would be leased. Of course, due to the roundabout, there is limited access to the south side of 116th now also. Just have to go down to the light.

  4. Hey smudge, You're opposed to arresting people for minor crimes? Sounds great! We should only focus on murders and such, right? Let's stand around and wait until someone shoots someone before we act. Whatever we do, we should never question anyone, frisk anyone, or arrest anyone unless they are actively engaged in shooting or stabbing. Very sound!

  5. You guys are being really rude to gays in the comments. (Not all of you, I presume). You need to stop it. Gays have just as much of a right to marry as straight people do. It's not fair how you guys are denying them equal rights. They're acting more human than you'll ever be. We obviously haven't matured since the bible was last updated. Hate the sin, not the sinner. You've all committed a sin at least once in your life. You've lied, you've stolen, etc. (Those are just possibilities). We should have a planet for people that support gay rights and a planet for people that don't. Then, gay people could get married without you bigots interfering with their love life. How would you feel if straights couldn't get married? How would you feel if teenagers were afraid to come out to their parents as straight? If straight people got hate everywhere they went? If straight people were afraid to go out in public, because they feared being judged? It's never going to happen at the rate society is going. You haven't seen the side of me where I act obscene. You're glad my inner demon hasn't been released. I would, but oh no, my comment would be removed because of my very strong emotions about this subject. I love gays, and love how they show their affection for each other. I just ADORE how a state is going to give same-sex couples a marriage license, then changes their mind. (I was obviously being sarcastic there). I just LOVE how society thinks gays are an abomination to our society. You're caring about marriage between two men or two women. That's a small thing. Just grow up, and let them marry. Let them live their lives. You can't make them change their sexuality. You can't make them change their lifestyle. In my opinion, gays are more than welcome to marry. Please, grow up and realize that people should be allowed to marry, even if it's same-sex marriage. You guys are saying that "the bible said gay marriage is wrong." Well, guess what else is wrong? Read Matthew:7 and you'll find out. (I am in no way breaking that. I am saying a fact). I'm stating that gays have just as much of a right to marry as straights do. (: