IBJNews

Johnson County flood victims still reeling 4 years later

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Edinburgh resident Daniel Garvey was in Ohio when he got a call that his neighborhood had flooded.

His cellphone died before he could find out how bad it was.

Garvey rushed to his Johnson County home and found that it was worse than he'd imagined.

Floodwater had risen over some mailboxes in his Pruitt East neighborhood.

A 4-pound bass was swimming in his backyard. One of his vehicles was underwater. Everything in his house was soaked or tainted with mildew.

Garvey had to borrow about $90,000 to fix up his home and replace his possessions. Now he has to make $400-a-month payments on the loan.

"It's a real kick in the back of the head," he said.

He feels as though he's stuck with a second mortgage and won't be able to pay off the debt for at least a decade.

The devastating 2008 flood continues to have repercussions for victims, even if they no longer have all their soaked possessions piled on their lawns, Garvey said. Flood victims are still paying off the tens of thousands of dollars they had to borrow in some cases to hang new drywall, lay down new carpeting and replace major appliances.

"People drive by, see that your house looks nice and think that everything's fine," he said. "But flood victims are still paying for that. It's the flood all over again every time I have to pay that bill."

Edinburgh residents who took water in their homes said they've been thinking more about the flood as the fourth anniversary approached. They said they've tried to put it out of mind and move on with their lives even if it took a toll on their finances or health.

Many lost irreplaceable possessions, such as baby photos, scrapbooks full of memories or family Bibles they inherited.

The town was one of the hardest-hit communities in Johnson County during the 2008 flood, but most residents were able to stay and rebuild, town council member Ron Hoffman said. They didn't have to tear down homes but had to replace drywall and carpeting.

An engineering firm recently completed a drainage plan for Edinburgh aimed at preventing such flooding in the future, Hoffman said. The town must figure out how to pay for new drains and other infrastructure.

Edinburgh already has fixed a broken pipe and installed new drains, including a wide-mouthed one on the cul-de-sac in front of Marshall Kaserman's house in Pruitt East.

Kaserman's home flooded in the late 1970s, but he decided to stay and rebuild. His home took more than 30 inches of water four years ago.

Repairs cost about $30,000, but life has since gotten back to normal, he said.

"I try to put it out of my mind," he said. "If it floods again, I just won't come back."

Pruitt East resident Bertha Bailey also has tried to forget about the flood by focusing on her grandchildren's sports, including her grandson's run last season with the high school boys' basketball team.

Floodwater destroyed most of her husband's Coca-Cola memorabilia collection, furniture he bought her for Christmas shortly after they were married and the possessions they saved from their late sons, who died in a car accidents.

The Baileys had to live in a camper in their driveway for about a month while they hung new drywall and rebuilt.

"I try not to even think about it," she said. "I just think that nothing can be done, and it happened. It's gone. I just don't let it bother me."

Garvey said it can be hard to move on when he's still paying for major repairs, appliances and all the other things he had to replace.

"Water is devastating," he said. "Even if it doesn't touch it, the condensation and mildew absolutely destroys everything. All your clothes are gone. All the pictures on the wall are gone. Everything is gone, done."

Expenses pile up, and the debt can't be paid off quickly or easily, he said.

"It's a real hardship," he said. "You've got to take out all these loans to get back on your feet, and you just keep paying and paying."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT