Judge tosses fraud claim in Mel Simon estate case

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A Hamilton County judge has dismissed a fraud claim leveled by one of Melvin Simon's daughters in her lawsuit challenging the late developer’s estate plan.

Judge William J. Hughes of Hamilton Superior Court ruled that the plaintiff, Deborah Simon, failed to argue that her stepmother Bren committed fraud with “sufficient specificity.”

He said the general allegations contained in Deborah’s suit, filed in early January, didn’t comply with an Indiana trial rule requiring plaintiffs to provide enough information to enable defendants to prepare a proper defense.

In his March 19 order, the judge gave Deborah’s attorneys the opportunity to refile the claim with additional detail. An attorney representing Deborah, who is Bren’s stepdaughter, declined to comment.

The ruling is a setback for Deborah’s effort to throw out changes in the plan her billionaire father signed off on in February 2009, seven months before he died at age 82. But even if her attorneys fail to sway the judge to reconsider, the parties will continue to litigate Deborah’s other claims, which include undue influence and duress.

Deborah contends her father was suffering from dementia and didn’t understand what he was doing when he revised the plan, boosting the share of his fortune going directly to Bren from one-third to one-half.

The changes also wiped out a portion that was to go to Deborah and her siblings from Melvin’s first marriage—Cynthia Simon-Skjodt and David Simon, the chairman and CEO of Simon Property Group—and left charitable gifts stipulated in prior versions to Bren’s discretion.

Bren, 66, who married Melvin in 1972, contends the changes fully reflected his wishes.

Melvin Simon was one of Indiana’s richest men. Forbes magazine in March 2009 estimated his net worth at $1.3 billion. Shares of Simon Property, his principal holding, have zoomed higher since, perhaps pushing the value of his fortune past $2 billion.




  • tthrow out the new will
    Bren,just because you married to him for 40 year,"you do not have the rigth to claim that momey".you need to take,the fist settlement.
  • fair share
    just award everyone a fair share and let them decide how to devy it up with charity
    all biological children should get something i think the spouse is just trying to be greedy and i dont think the man changed his will on his own i think he was "encouraged" to do it possibly under threat of duress
  • c'mon
    What purpose did it serve to change the will from 1/3 to 1/2, only one person benefits from that and it seems a little odd Mel is going to wait that long to change his will. It doesn't matter how long they were married, Mel's kids deserve a share of the estate and the charitable contributions that Mel is so known for could use the money too.
  • Deborah, GET A JOB
    Deborah, I hope you tell your overpaid attorney that he doesn't get to charge you for making that mistake. Bad! Make sure you check that bill, cuz you know, you might end up paying it yourself because I don't think you are going to get any judge to feel sorry for you.

    Poor Bren! She has been married, what, 40 years to Mel? Give me a break. Mel's only mistake in life appears to be overindulging a spoiled rotten daughter who never figured out the free ride would end.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

    2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

    3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

    4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

    5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.