IBJNews

Judge tosses fraud claim in Mel Simon estate case

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A Hamilton County judge has dismissed a fraud claim leveled by one of Melvin Simon's daughters in her lawsuit challenging the late developer’s estate plan.

Judge William J. Hughes of Hamilton Superior Court ruled that the plaintiff, Deborah Simon, failed to argue that her stepmother Bren committed fraud with “sufficient specificity.”

He said the general allegations contained in Deborah’s suit, filed in early January, didn’t comply with an Indiana trial rule requiring plaintiffs to provide enough information to enable defendants to prepare a proper defense.

In his March 19 order, the judge gave Deborah’s attorneys the opportunity to refile the claim with additional detail. An attorney representing Deborah, who is Bren’s stepdaughter, declined to comment.

The ruling is a setback for Deborah’s effort to throw out changes in the plan her billionaire father signed off on in February 2009, seven months before he died at age 82. But even if her attorneys fail to sway the judge to reconsider, the parties will continue to litigate Deborah’s other claims, which include undue influence and duress.

Deborah contends her father was suffering from dementia and didn’t understand what he was doing when he revised the plan, boosting the share of his fortune going directly to Bren from one-third to one-half.

The changes also wiped out a portion that was to go to Deborah and her siblings from Melvin’s first marriage—Cynthia Simon-Skjodt and David Simon, the chairman and CEO of Simon Property Group—and left charitable gifts stipulated in prior versions to Bren’s discretion.

Bren, 66, who married Melvin in 1972, contends the changes fully reflected his wishes.

Melvin Simon was one of Indiana’s richest men. Forbes magazine in March 2009 estimated his net worth at $1.3 billion. Shares of Simon Property, his principal holding, have zoomed higher since, perhaps pushing the value of his fortune past $2 billion.
 

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • tthrow out the new will
    Bren,just because you married to him for 40 year,"you do not have the rigth to claim that momey".you need to take,the fist settlement.
  • fair share
    just award everyone a fair share and let them decide how to devy it up with charity
    all biological children should get something i think the spouse is just trying to be greedy and i dont think the man changed his will on his own i think he was "encouraged" to do it possibly under threat of duress
  • c'mon
    What purpose did it serve to change the will from 1/3 to 1/2, only one person benefits from that and it seems a little odd Mel is going to wait that long to change his will. It doesn't matter how long they were married, Mel's kids deserve a share of the estate and the charitable contributions that Mel is so known for could use the money too.
  • Deborah, GET A JOB
    Deborah, I hope you tell your overpaid attorney that he doesn't get to charge you for making that mistake. Bad! Make sure you check that bill, cuz you know, you might end up paying it yourself because I don't think you are going to get any judge to feel sorry for you.

    Poor Bren! She has been married, what, 40 years to Mel? Give me a break. Mel's only mistake in life appears to be overindulging a spoiled rotten daughter who never figured out the free ride would end.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. The Fringe! Plus, the simple fact that there are so many local faves in such close proximity to each other.

    2. I remenber, watching the toll road, being built, through South Bend, when I was 10 years old. I believe, back then that it was estimated, that the toll road, would be paid for in 20 years and then it would be free. I am now 71, what happened? Since the power is in the people, by that, I mean that, we the people are in total control of everything. I, suggest that no one ever use the toll road again, let it go broke. We the people can control the price of everything, from groceries to gas, if we would just do it. If we don't pay the asking price, the sellers will lower the price and if we wait awhile, they will lower the price to what we accept as reasonable. I would like to know why a highway like interstate 94, is so well maintained, a much better highway, than the toll road, but has no tolls. I would also like to know why, a sitting governor, with a term limit, maximum of eight years, can lease, public property, for 75 years. Even though I have transponders in both of my trucks and will not be affected by the increase, I have been and will contine to avoid using the toll road. I make many trips from northern Indiana to Chicago, every year, and I prefer the better highway, I94!

    3. Coming from her background,she should be used to those kinds of advances! Menard probably figured it was ok to tuck a buck!

    4. I'm still waiting for the list of available, high quality apartments in the Village.

    5. This criminal masquerading as a lawyer obviously has serious issues. He’s been proven by his own testimony to be a pathological liar and probably has a personality disorder as he seems to be constructing a reality around himself. He places no value on truth, honesty or loyalty as evidenced by what he has done to his clients and his own family. And by the demands and lies he has made in court, it is evident he feels entitled to do and say whatever suits his purpose and everyone else is expected to nod obediently and believe him because he is, after all, Bill Super Lawyer; or BS lawyer for short. This millionaire wanna-be no longer owns anything of value; he squandered it and put everything he had into foreclosure. He has no money, house, car, boat or vacation home left to show for what he earned or what he stole. He’s just another loser without morals who will be doing time. I’m certain all of his courtroom shenanigans are antagonizing his poor victims. As Lamar said, his behavior and claims in court have been outrageous. The judge needs to be more than concerned; he needs to be judicial and end this nonsense.

    ADVERTISEMENT