IBJNews

  • Home

Kite Realty sees decline in quarterly results

Associated Press
February 16, 2011
Keywords
Commercial Real Estate, Financial Results, Kite Realty Group, Public Companies, Real Estate & Retail, Real Estate Investment Trust
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Indianapolis-based Kite Realty Group Trust on Wednesday reported a fourth-quarter loss on declining revenue.

The real estate investment trust lost $1.2 million during the quarter ended Dec. 31, compared to a profit of $600,000 in the same quarter of 2009.

Revenue was $25.9 million in the recent quarter, down from $29.3 million in the year-ago period.

Funds from operations, or FFO, was $7.8 million, or 11 cents per share, in the fourth quarter, compared to $8.7 million, or 12 cents per share, in the prior year.

FFO is a common performance measure used by real estate investment trusts.

In full-year results, Kite reported FFO of $30.3 million, or 42 cents per share, in 2010 compared to $28.7 million, or 48 cents per share, for 2009.

Company revenue decreased from $115.3 million in 2009 to $101.4 million in 2010. The company lost $8.6 million last year compared to a loss of $1.8 million the year before.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

ADVANCED SEARCH
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ

  1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

  2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

  3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

  4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

  5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

ADVERTISEMENT