IBJNews

Lawrence Township finds buyers for surplus buildings

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Lawrence Township school district has sold one building, has three offers for another and is seeking tenants for 100,000 square feet in a third building as it follows through with a plan launched last fall to dispose of its surplus real estate.

The district closed two weeks ago on the sale of a 15,700-square-foot building at Fort Harrison. The buyer was The Hutson School, a K-12 school for students with language-based learning disabilities.

Tim Norton, a principal in Summit Realty Group, the firm hired by Lawrence Township to assess the district’s real estate holdings, said the building at 5626 Lawton Loop East Drive sold for the $1.4 million asking price. The sale included 11 acres of adjacent land.

A church that had been leasing the building has moved out, and the school has embarked on $170,000 in improvements, including a new roof and cosmetic upgrades, to prepare the building for 85 students and 30 faculty members later this summer, said school headmaster Janet George.

George said the school is being renamed Fortune Academy to recognize $500,000 in gifts from local philanthropist Richard H. Fortune and his family’s foundation that went toward the purchase of the building. This fall will mark the start of the private, not-for-profit school’s 11th year. It is relocating from space it rents from a Lutheran church at 75th Street and Shadeland Avenue. Fortune Academy was represented in the building purchase by Chriss Horton of One Source Commercial Realty.

The Lawrence Township school district also has decided to sell the 46,370-square-foot original Lawrence Central High School at 8301 E. 46th St.

Norton said three offers, all near the $650,000 asking price, are on the table. The school board is expected at its July 9 meeting to accept one of the offers, all of which are from developers of senior housing that propose retrofitting the building to house from 42 and 60 apartments. The building, which includes 2.4 acres of land, was built in 1923 as the township high school. Most recently the district used it for storage and to house its maintenance division.

Those functions and the district’s administrative offices are now housed at the former Craig Middle School, 6501 Sunnyside Road, which became the Lawrence Education and Community Center last year. Norton said the building has about 100,000 square feet of excess space that his firm is shopping to not-for-profit tenants. The asking rent is $15 a square foot, full service.

The consolidation of functions into that 246,000-square-foot building precipitated the district’s decision to hire Summit to evaluate its real estate assets, Robin Phelps, the district’s chief financial officer, told IBJ last October.

The district’s offices had been housed in a 20,800-square-foot administration building at 7601 E. 56th St. Based on Summit’s recommendation, the district has decided to raze that building, which is adjacent to Belzer Middle School. The land will be used for a softball field and additional parking for the school. Norton said leasing or selling the building wasn’t feasible considering the improvements it needs.

Lawrence Township is fortunate to have been able to resolve its surplus assets situation in a relatively short amount of time, especially given the lackluster real estate market, Norton said.

“These are difficult properties, even in good times,” he said.

Phelps, the CFO, said the district is happy with the outcome. "The district has been pleased at how quickly we've received offers on the properties," she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. From the story: "The city of Indianapolis also will consider tax incentives and funding for infrastructure required for the project, according to IEDC." Why would the City need to consider additional tax incentives when Lowe's has already bought the land and reached an agreement with IEDC to bring the jobs? What that tells me is that the City has already pledged the incentives, unofficially, and they just haven't had time to push it through the MDC yet. Either way, subsidizing $10/hour jobs is going to do nothing toward furthering the Mayor's stated goal of attracting middle and upper-middle class residents to Marion County.

  2. Ron Spencer and the entire staff of Theater on the Square embraced IndyFringe when it came to Mass Ave in 2005. TOTS was not only a venue but Ron and his friends created, presented and appeared in shows which embraced the 'spirit of the fringe'. He's weathered all the storms and kept smiling ... bon voyage and thank you.

  3. Not sure how many sushi restaurants are enough, but there are three that I know of in various parts of downtown proper and all are pretty good.

  4. First off, it's "moron," not "moran." 2nd, YOU don't get to vote on someone else's rights and freedoms that are guaranteed by the US Constitution. That's why this is not a state's rights issue...putting something like this to vote by, well, people like you who are quite clearly intellectually challenged isn't necessary since the 14th amendment has already decided the issue. Which is why Indiana's effort is a wasted one and a waste of money...and will be overturned just like this has in every other state.

  5. Rick, how does granting theright to marry to people choosing to marry same-sex partners harm the lives of those who choose not to? I cannot for the life of me see any harm to people who choose not to marry someone of the same sex. We understand your choice to take the parts of the bible literally in your life. That is fine but why force your religious beliefs on others? I'm hoping the judges do the right thing and declare the ban unconstitutional so all citizens of Wisconsin and Indiana have the same marriage rights and that those who chose someone of the same sex do not have less rights than others.

ADVERTISEMENT