Lender Oak Street acquired by New York firm

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

For the second time in three years, Carmel-based insurance lender Oak Street Funding LLC has been acquired.

The company announced Thursday that it has been purchased by private equity funds managed by New York-based Angelo Gordon & Co.

Oak Street, founded in Carmel in 2003, was acquired in 2007 by Bridge Finance Group of Chicago for about $75 million, but remained in Carmel as a Bridge Finance subsidiary. The company has about 35 employees.

Terms of the latest deal were not disclosed.

A spokesman for Oak Street said the company will continue operations in Carmel and plans to add more employees.

“With this additional capital, we’ve strengthened our position as the top insurance lender and now have the ability to better serve our customers and actively expand our products and services into new areas,” said Rick Dennen, Oak Street founder and CEO, in a prepared statement.

Oak Street provides loans to insurance agents in order to expand their business and increase sales. The firm raised $50 million in capital a year ago.

The company said despite tough economic conditions, it "recorded its best year ever in 2009 and has continued to secure new sources of capital and lend money to a growing number of agents and brokers nationwide."

Angelo Gordon is a privately held registered investment adviser that specializes in alternative investing. The firm was founded in 1988 and manages about $23 billion.

“We are excited to work with Rick and the management group at Oak Street," said Art Peponis, co-head of private equity at Angelo Gordon. "They have carved out a unique position in the insurance-lending industry, and we believe the company is poised to continue its growth.”


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.