IBJNews

Local Better Business Bureau names new leader

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

William J. Thomas has been named president of the Better Business Bureau of Central Indiana, the organization announced Monday. 

He replaces Linda Carmody, who resigned in April after 16 years in charge of the organization. Philip J. Gibson, a former human resources director at Eli Lilly and Co., filled in on an interim basis until a permanent replacement could be found.

Thomas, 43, joins the BBB from Kosene and Kosene Development Co. in Indianapolis. There, he served as vice president of sales and marketing for Kosene and Kosene Residential Inc., a division of the company that develops upscale, urban condominiums primarily in the Indianapolis market.

Previously, he held various management positions during eight years at the former ATA Airlines, including director of sales and distribution, director of vacations sales and marketing, and director of strategic planning. He also was a senior business analyst at Indianapolis-based Accenture.

“Bill has a proven history of leading large-scale, customer-focused sales and marketing initiatives, and we're pleased to welcome him to the Better Business Bureau,” said Jeff McKinley, president of the BBB’s board of directors, in a prepared statement.

A graduate of Avon High School, Thomas earned an undergraduate degree in business administration from Valparaiso University and a master's degree in marketing from Indiana University.

The mission of the Better Business Bureau is to promote business integrity and ethics, build consumer confidence in the free enterprise system and encourage cooperation between business and consumers.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT