LOU'S VIEWS: Adieu, Anderson

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

Every election cycle, the mantra seems to be, “Are you better off than you were four, two or how-many-ever years ago?”

The assumption behind such a question is that one should make a judgment based on how you, personally, have been affected by someone else doing a job.

I question whether this is what we should be asking. After all, shouldn’t we be concerned with how others are doing, too? But I did ask the question when I heard Maxwell Anderson is leaving his position as director and CEO of the Indianapolis Museum of Art to take a similar gig in Dallas.

Am I, as a patron of the IMA, better off than I was more than five years ago, when Anderson took the job?

a&e-ima-anderson-max-15col.jpg Maxwell Anderson ends his tenure as CEO of the Indianapolis Museum of Art on Dec. 31. (Photo Courtesy Indianapolis Museum of Art)

To be clear, I’m not asking this as an employee of the IMA. I’m not asking this as a museum board member or donor. I’m not asking as a neighbor, and I’m not asking as an artist.

I’m just asking as a guy who believes art can enlighten, transform and give perspective. And as someone who believes it’s part of the responsibility of an art museum CEO to make sure his or her organization is a cultural leader. That it prompts questions that don’t necessarily have easy or popular answers.

I’m also asking it as a guy who wants his kids to be around art because it uniquely reminds us that we are and always have been human and that the world looks both different and the same when seen through the eyes of others.

It’s tough to deny that, during Andersons’ 5-1/2-year tenure, the IMA universe seems to have expanded exponentially. I used

to tell out-of-town friends that ours was a good “one-of-each” museum. We have our Seurat. We have our O’Keefe. We have our Gauguin—all fine for us, but not impressive to the outside world. Among our other selling points were the IMA’s ease of access (before the ill-fated admission charge kicked in) and the fact that you could take your kids’ pictures near their respective ages in Robert Indiana’s “Numbers” sculptures on the deck.

These days, it’s not so easy to get near Indiana’s numbers, but it is certainly easier to experience the IMA. Gone is the admission price (except for special exhibitions), which is an enlightened move that sends the right message about who art should be for. Gone is the building’s “seen-it-before” façade. Gone is, frankly, the yawn.

Not that this is the most important thing, but we seem to have a lot more to brag about these days.

The last half decade at the IMA has included a mix of strong-enough-to-play-anywhere shows on Warhol, Dial and others, as well as introductions to contemporary artists, including some locals.

And we’ve now got a great park in the IMA’s back yard—one likely to be experienced by many people who otherwise would not have set foot in the main building. The 100 Acre Art & Nature Park actually did draw national attention. And deserved it. So did the IMA’s acquisition of the Miller House in Columbus, an architectural treasure among Columbus’ architectural treasures.

And where we once had IMA movies only in the summer on the terrace, we now have the Toby, a terrific screening room that actively programs films both popular and obscure.

And the cornbread at the café is really good now, too.

Does that mean I like everything I’ve seen on the IMA walls and grounds under Anderson’s watch?

Absolutely not. Followers of this column know that. And I’m glad it’s that way. Some choices worked for me, some didn’t. And that’s how it should be. A good art museum—in fact, any good arts institution—should give us stuff to chew on, not a steady diet of things that go down easily. If I railed a bit loudly about, for instance, certain works that crowded the IMA entryway, well, I knew another potentially interesting work would take its place in a few months’ time. I never would have preferred a parade of more conservative choices. I go to an art museum to see things I haven’t seen and for new ways of seeing what I’ve seen before.

What was that question again?

Oh, yes: Am I better off as an Indy arts patron than I was five or so years ago?

My answer? An emphatic, yes.

And while I fully realize that what’s been achieved has been a team effort—with much of the groundwork paved while Anderson was still doing battle on the New York art scene—I can’t imagine that all of this would have happened without his guidance and his tenacity.

Like many others, I didn’t expect Anderson to stick around Indianapolis long. In the beginning, I had him pegged for three years and out. But I don’t hold moving on against him. As a transplant myself, I appreciate that sometimes roots take and sometimes they don’t. A strong arts community is built on a combination of permanent and temporary work, permanent and temporary artists, and permanent and temporary leadership.

I wish Anderson’s family the best in their new home. I congratulate Dallas on its new hire. And I offer a thank you to Max Anderson for having the impact he did on Indy and our art museum.•


This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Great article and post scripts by Mike L (Great addition to IBJ BTW). Bobby's stubborn as a mule, and doubt if he ever comes back to IU. But the love he would receive would be enormous. Hope he shows some time, but not counting on it.

  2. When the Indiana GOP was going around the State selling the Voucher bill they were promising people that the vouchers would only be for public charter schools. They lied. As usual.

  3. I am Mr. Morris Ray, a Legitimate And a Reputable money Lender. We lend funds out to individuals in need of financial assistance, we give loan to people that have a bad credit or in need of money to pay bills, to invest on business. Have you been looking for loan? you have not to worry, because you are in the right place i offer loan at low interest rate of 2% so if you are in need of a loan i want you to just contact me via this email Address: morris_ray123@outlook.com

  4. Jim, your "misleading" numbers comment is spot on. This is the spin these posers are putting on it. News flash, fans: these guys lie. They are not publicly traded so no one holds them accountable for anything they say. The TV numbers are so miniscule to begin with any "increase" produces double digit "growth" numbers. It's ridiculous to think that anything these guys have done has awakened the marketplace. What have they done? Consolidate the season so they run more races on consecutive weekends? And this creates "momentum." Is that the same momentum you enjoy when you don't race between August and March? Keep in mind that you are running teams who barely make ends meet ragged over the summer to accomplish this brilliant strategy of avoiding the NFL while you run your season finale at midnight on the East Coast. But I should not obfuscate my own point: any "ratings increase" is exactly what Jim points to - the increased availability of NBC Sports in households. Look fans, I love the sport to but these posers are running it off a cliff. Miles wants to declare victory and then run for Mayor. I could go on and on but bottom line for God's sake don't believe a word they say. Note to Anthony - try doing just a little research instead of reporting what these pretenders say and then offering an "opinion" no more informed than the average fan.

  5. If he's finally planning to do the right thing and resign, why not do it before the election? Waiting until after means what - s special election at tax payer expense? Appointment (by whom?) thus robbing the voters of their chance to choose? Does he accrue some additional financial advantage to waiting, like extra pension payments? What's in it for him? That's the question that needs to be asked.