IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: Flagrant fouls make Globetrotter win dubious

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

This week, some questionable officiating leads to a Harlem Globetrotters victory, a WWII kitchen sink drama—with a twist—opens at the Phoenix, and blissful silliness takes center stage at Beef & Boards.
__________

I may not be the most sports-savvy person in Indianapolis, but I’m certain that I saw some pretty flagrant rule violations during the Harlem Globetrotters Conseco Fieldhouse matchup against the Washington Generals Jan. 18.

Globetrotter Scooter Christensen keeps the Curly Neal tradition alive with impressive ball handling. (Photo Courtesy Harlem Globetrotters International, Inc.)
Am I wrong to believe that removing another player’s pants is a violation worth at least a few foul shots? Or that dangling upside down from the rim should disqualify the preceding dunk? Nowhere in any rule book I’ve ever seen is it sanctioned to acquire a purse from a woman in the stands, then lure her out to center court with promise of its return. To expect a kiss in exchange for the goods would seem beyond an intentional foul. In any other place of business, it would be grounds for a harassment lawsuit.

The Globetrotter/Generals game was rife with such uncalled fouls—from both teams. While the Washington players seemed to behave in accordance with accepted basketball practice, their coach repeatedly crossed the line. His most obvious breach: the use of a hypnotic umbrella on members of the Globetrotters team to get them to do his bidding. Worse, the coach often left the sidelines and ventured onto the court during play to do so.

The crowd, which seemed overwhelmingly on the side of the Harlem team, heartily booed the schemes of the Generals’ coach. Still, the ineffectual refs hardly seemed to notice. Rather than wait for the officials to right the wrong, the unaffected Trotters discovered that the effects of the hypnosis could be negated by the execution of a spectacular trick shot. Such shots being in ample supply, the team was soon back to normal, with little damage done to their lead.

The Generals proved adept at quick three-pointers, thanks in part to the little care the Trotters seemed to take when it came to defense. That, combined with a scorekeeper’s heavy hand, turned what should have been a blowout into a three-point game as the clock ticked toward the final moments. It ended with the Globetrotters up by five.

In a friendly bet with my guest, I took the more disciplined Generals and lost. I’m confident, with more attentive officiating, things will go differently when the teams face off again at Conseco Fieldhouse in April.
__________

The setup: May is the wife of a soldier serving overseas in WWII. While holding down the home front, she’s inspired to explore beyond her own expectations of herself. When this means discovering the pleasures of an art museum, she’s giddy with her newfound freedom. When it means the possibility of a physical relationship with her longtime gal pal Billie, she isn’t quite so sure of the rightness of her exploration.

Alan Brody’s “The Housewives of Mannheim” focuses on a situation I’ve never seen presented on stage or screen before. So why, in its local premiere at the Phoenix Theatre (through Feb. 6), did it feel so overtly familiar?

In a production with much to praise, what keeps it from maximum impact is the play itself. Brody effectively sets things up in the first act, but is less inspired in the second. The play fishes for an effective conclusion, but never quite finds one, settling for an attractive tableau rather than committed choices. “Housewives” is upgraded, however, by performers who find nuance and truth even when they aren’t supplied by the author.

In the central role, Lauren Briggeman inhabits not just May, but her kitchen as well. The show is well-grounded in place, and designer James Gross has created a space that is both comforting and confining, accentuating May’s core dilemma. Briggeman is beautiful, as the part requires, but she’s also got just the right amount of self-conscious awkwardness. There’s a vulnerability to her that is endearing and exciting. Allison Moody (seen last season at the Phoenix in “Mauritius”) could have easily taken Billie into sitcom stylings, but instead she’s layered and engaging. Martha Jacobs is equally fine as a wheelchair-bound former concert pianist, now a refugee stranger in what’s revealed as a too-familiar land. The only weak link in the on-stage quartet is Wendy Peace, giving a never believable one-note performance in the show’s least interesting role as Alice, the picture of stateside domesticity.
__________

Unlike the annual farces offered at Beef & Boards in previous Januarys, doors aren’t slammed in “The Foreigner” (through Feb. 7). Instead, Ken Ludwig’s play, about a man pretending to not understand English in order to be left alone, finds its biggest laughs in the verbal rather than the physical—and that’s just fine.

The obvious reasons for the show’s comedic success are the well-wound play itself and the players performing it here—particularly Kate Braun as the blissfully unaware innkeeper and Jeff Stockberger as the title outsider (who only briefly steps into “Borat” territory). David Purdy is also fine, particularly in a hilariously played breakfast scene with Stockberger.

Credit should also go to director Eddie Curry. He seems to completely understand that compassion for the characters helps take the oft-staged comedy to the next level. Laughing is great. Laughing with characters you love and believe is even better.•

__________

This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The deductible is entirely paid by the POWER account. No one ever has to contribute more than $25/month into the POWER account and it is often less. The only cost not paid out of the POWER account is the ER copay ($8-25) for non-emergent use of the ER. And under HIP 2.0, if a member calls the toll-free, 24 hour nurse line, and the nurse tells them to go to the ER, the copay is waived. It's also waived if the member is admitted to the hospital. Honestly, although it is certainly not "free" - I think Indiana has created a decent plan for the currently uninsured. Also consider that if a member obtains preventive care, she can lower her monthly contribution for the next year. Non-profits may pay up to 75% of the contribution on behalf of the member, and the member's employer may pay up to 50% of the contribution.

  2. I wonder if the governor could multi-task and talk to CMS about helping Indiana get our state based exchange going so Hoosiers don't lose subsidy if the court decision holds. One option I've seen is for states to contract with healthcare.gov. Or maybe Indiana isn't really interested in healthcare insurance coverage for Hoosiers.

  3. So, how much did either of YOU contribute? HGH Thank you Mr. Ozdemir for your investments in this city and your contribution to the arts.

  4. So heres brilliant planning for you...build a $30 M sports complex with tax dollars, yet send all the hotel tax revenue to Carmel and Fishers. Westfield will unlikely never see a payback but the hotel "centers" of Carmel and Fishers will get rich. Lousy strategy Andy Cook!

  5. AlanB, this is how it works...A corporate welfare queen makes a tiny contribution to the arts and gets tons of positive media from outlets like the IBJ. In turn, they are more easily to get their 10s of millions of dollars of corporate welfare (ironically from the same people who are against welfare for humans).

ADVERTISEMENT