IBJOpinion

LOU'S VIEWS: Indy Opera's 'Carmen' shows upside of downsizing

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Lou Harry

When word went out that one of the three Indianapolis Opera presentations this season would be a production of “Carmen,” sans chorus, sans full orchestra, sans biggie-size sets, and sans Clowes Hall stage, it was perfectly understandable that some patrons may have lowered their expectations.

After all, one of the pleasures of opera—at least, opera as we have come to know it here—is its scale.

But as reordered, tightened and otherwise reconfigured by adapter Peter Brook, “La Tragedie de Carmen” makes sense on a small stage, one in which the passions don’t have to be played to the back of the balcony. And it’s just one of many operas whose ideal venue seats dozens or hundreds instead of thousands.
 

Before I go further, let me clear up a misconception I may have inadvertently helped create.

In my e-mail preview of Indianapolis Opera’s “La Tragedie de Carmen,” I described the Basile Opera Centre as “mid-to-small church in size.” (If you don’t get my Thursday e-mail blast, visit www.ibj.com/registration and

sign up. It’s free.) I did not mean to imply that patrons would be seated in pews or that the performance would be held in the former sanctuary of the venue. The performance space is actually in the rehearsal hall, transformed with a small stage, risers, and a lighting grid into a more-than-acceptable theater space.


A&E Ariana Chris and Clayton Hilley lead an up-close-and-personal “Carmen.” (Photo ©Denis Ryan Kelly Jr. )

The biggest advantage to the intimate arrangement is that there proved no need for electronic amplification. At “Carmen,” voices, unadorned, blended with music, unadorned, with conductor James Caraher expertly balancing his small orchestra. It soared when it needed to, but never stepped on the voices.

To be sure, there are added acting pressures put on the performers when the furthest audience member is close to the action. The leads are double cast, but the company I saw for the eight-performance run (closing March 20) ably brought the piece to life. Clayton Hilley offered an easily duped, Andy-Richter-like sad sack Don Jose. Darren K. Stokes personified arrogant strength as bullfighter Escamillo. Rachel E. Copeland’s Micaela, in lovely voice, was believably naive but still capable of a heated cat fight. And Ariana Chris offered a notably hostile Carmen, more interested in manipulating than in anything resembling love.

One of the challenges of such in-your-face opera is that the actors occasionally have little to do when the music is taking precedence. Chris, even in vocal downtime, knew how to hold attention.

All were abetted by Betsy Cooprider-Bernstein’s lighting design and Stage Director Joachim Schamberger’s set and project design. Sometimes, the images lingered a bit too long, but the overall impact was to expand the stage without being too literal. Projected elements were nicely echoed in on-stage props, paying off particularly well in the dramatic final moment (which I won’t reveal).

I wish there were more such stunning moments throughout—a little theatrical magic might have helped up the heat level. But the result proved far more than just an IO budget-tightening experiment.

More important, it indicated an expanded vision for the company—a vision that points the way to wider repertoire, more innovative productions, and the potential for increased audiences.

I left the theater with a greater sense of the potential of Indianapolis Opera as a creative force, rather than simply as an able presenter. Bravo.
__________

Musicals are perennially popular. Yet in Indianapolis, the largest regional theater (the Indiana Repertory Theatre) avoids them. The most significant college theater (Butler University) shuns them. And the touring Broadway season doesn’t draw enough subscribers to bring in a strong season of them.

Yes, we have Beef & Boards Dinner Theatre—a rare dinner-and-a-show venue featuring professional talent. BobDirex periodically offers a new show. Actors Theatre of Indiana is increasing its ambitions with its upcoming production of “Chicago.” And the Phoenix will work in one or two intimate ones a season.

A&E Civic Theatre operates on a scale grander than any other musical-making company in town. (Photo Courtesy Civic Theatre)

But large-scale musical theater work here largely has been left to the avocational theaters—community theaters or professionally managed companies that can fill the stage in part because the actors aren’t being paid.

Leading among them is Booth Tarkington Civic Theatre (formerly known as Indianapolis Civic Theatre) which, next season, will make the jump to a new theater at the Center for the Performing Arts in Carmel.

Civic’s latest offering, “Cabaret” (through March 26), shows off its strengths with an able retelling of the landmark musical—one of the first mainstream shows in which songs directly commented on the serious action in a satiric way. For those unfamiliar, it revolves around an American writer whose stay in Germany coincides with the rise of Nazi power. That power doesn’t arise just from force, but from the citizens’ willingness to believe that the troubles are outside and that as long as you keep dancing, those problems will go away.

Incorporating some but not all of the rethinking used in the recent, grittier Broadway revival, Civic’s production doesn’t transcend, but it delivers the material, benefiting from consistently strong vocals, a unified vision and strong performances by Jeremy Allen Brimm as the emcee and Mark Fishback as a tender, confused Herr Schultz.

Plus there’s Paul Hansen, who might qualify as Indy’s musical theater MVP this season thanks to his “Cabaret” role as smuggler Ernst Ludwig, recent appearances in “Spelling Bee” and “Forum,” and an upcoming spot in ATI’s “Chicago.”•

__________

This column appears weekly. Send information on upcoming arts and entertainment events to lharry@ibj.com. Twitter: IBJArts and follow Lou Harry’s A&E blog at www.ibj.com/arts.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I took Bruce's comments to highlight a glaring issue when it comes to a state's image, and therefore its overall branding. An example is Michigan vs. Indiana. Michigan has done an excellent job of following through on its branding strategy around "Pure Michigan", even down to the detail of the rest stops. Since a state's branding is often targeted to visitors, it makes sense that rest stops, being that point of first impression, should be significant. It is clear that Indiana doesn't care as much about the impression it gives visitors even though our branding as the Crossroads of America does place importance on travel. Bruce's point is quite logical and accurate.

  2. I appreciated the article. I guess I have become so accustomed to making my "pit stops" at places where I can ALSO get gasoline and something hot to eat, that I hardly even notice public rest stops anymore. That said, I do concur with the rationale that our rest stops (if we are to have them at all) can and should be both fiscally-responsible AND designed to make a positive impression about our state.

  3. I don't know about the rest of you but I only stop at these places for one reason, and it's not to picnic. I move trucks for dealers and have been to rest areas in most all 48 lower states. Some of ours need upgrading no doubt. Many states rest areas are much worse than ours. In the rest area on I-70 just past Richmond truckers have to hike about a quarter of a mile. When I stop I;m generally in a bit of a hurry. Convenience,not beauty, is a primary concern.

  4. Community Hospital is the only system to not have layoffs? That is not true. Because I was one of the people who was laid off from East. And all of the LPN's have been laid off. Just because their layoffs were not announced or done all together does not mean people did not lose their jobs. They cherry-picked people from departments one by one. But you add them all up and it's several hundred. And East has had a dramatic drop I in patient beds from 800 to around 125. I know because I worked there for 30 years.

  5. I have obtained my 6 gallon badge for my donation of A Positive blood. I'm sorry to hear that my donation was nothing but a profit center for the Indiana Blood Center.

ADVERTISEMENT