IBJNews

Mahern wants council members to disclose free game tix

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis City-County Council is poised to approve a huge increase in ticket taxes on professional sports, and one council member wants to make sure those voting on the hike disclose the freebies they get for Pacers and Colts games.

Democratic Councilor Brian Mahern has filed a proposal that would require council members to disclose gifts received from government entities, including municipal corporations. The proposal is aimed squarely at the Capital Improvement Board of Marion County, which operates Bankers Life Fieldhouse and Lucas Oil Stadium, and which receives revenue from the ticket tax. 

Council members including President Maggie Lewis, who is also a CIB director, readily admit that they've received free tickets, Mahern noted. “I’m not casting aspersions,” he said. “I believe there should be greater transparency in the reporting of gifts, period.”

The council will vote Monday night on the ticket-tax increase, as well as a hike in the car-rental tax. The tax on sports tickets and tickets for other for-profit events would go from 6 percent to 10 percent, a 67-percent jump. The local tax on car rentals would increase to 6 percent from 4 percent. Combined with 4-percent state rental tax and the 7-percent state sales tax, Marion County car-rental customers would pay a combined 17-percent tax after the increase.

Approval of the tax increases is likely because they're tied to a budget compromise with Mayor Greg Ballard.

Under the compromise, extra revenue in the first year, an estimated $6.7 million, will flow to the city's general fund, and the city will receive up to $3 million a year in the future.

Mahern’s proposal will be introduced Monday night and referred to the Ethics Committee.

The current ethics law requires council members to list on their annual ethics disclosures the people and firms from whom they received single gifts worth at least $100 and multiple gifts totaling $250 or more.

Mahern’s proposal expands that disclosure from people and firms doing business with the city or trying to influence the council to government entities. The proposal also adds gifts going to council members’ spouses and dependent children and requires the value of the gifts to be listed.

Also Monday, the council is set to vote on a new tax-increment finance district called North Midtown. The most controversial aspect of the new TIF district is that it will include a new Broad Ripple parking garage-retail development, for which the city donated $6.5 million in meter revenue. The garage, still under construction, is integrated with Keystone Construction Corp.’s mixed-use development.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Report everything
    There's no reason any freebies should be exempted from reporting. Better yet, there's no reason these elected officials should be getting freebies, period.
  • County Line Road Rentals
    I've always found it better to rent my car in Greenwood or north of 116th Street that way you don't pay the extra tax period.
  • ethics disclosures
    I would be in favor of disclosing any gifts received, no matter how small in value. Why would anyone be giving any type of gift to any politician, if they weren't eventually going to be expecting something in return? As far as the car rental tax, we recently rented a car for eight days; the car rental tax (before this proposed increase) was more than a single days rental! We've always found it more economical, in the long run, to use rentals for our vacations. This tax increase could be the tipping point in that argument; not good for us, not good for the car rental companies, and a net loss in tax revenue from our pockets. (Instead of paying the increased tax, we will pay no tax!)

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT