MERHOFF: Let's rethink what businesses want

Mo Merhoff
March 12, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Mo Merhoff“I’m looking for a nice bed-and-breakfast with an ocean view. Can you make some recommendations?”

Of course, the caller to the Carmel Chamber presumes she’s contacted Car-MEL, California, and is typically embarrassed/surprised/amused/all of the above to learn she’s talking instead with somebody in Indiana. We’ve got Hoosier hospitality in abundance. But mountains and ocean views?

Thirty years ago, those places with mountains or ocean views were where the family planned a vacation, not where their job was. Your job was where whoever hired you put you, whether it was Reedsburg, Rock Island, Chicago or Fond du Lac—all places our family moved when my father was transferred by his company.

Not anymore. Jobs are important, especially when they’re scarce during economic times like these. But, in ever-increasing numbers, they’re not first in the minds of college graduates. Author Richard Florida cited a recent Gallup survey of 28,000 graduates in their 20s. When they were asked what would keep them in their current location, their job ranked second. What did they value most? The ability to meet people and make friends. Amenities, including parks and open spaces followed, along with culture, nightlife and places to go to a concert, see new art or share a good meal with friends. Access to continuing-education classes rated high, too.

Knoll, the workplace furnishings company, found similar responses, resulting in an article titled, “Supporting Generation Y at Work.” Their respondents were commute-averse, ideally seeking a job they could reach on foot or on their bike. They preferred their workplace to be near a neighborhood with amenities like food, dry cleaning and a place to work out.

Today’s lifestyle preferences have trumped yesterday’s corporate loyalty, just as flatter organizational structures leading to greater employee interaction have replaced pyramid-shaped corporate structures.

So if we believe that strong businesses make strong communities, how can central Indiana ensure we win the economic development game, without any mountain scenery?

For one, we can change the thinking that a high-rise structure surrounded by a lot of concrete for parking is the only option. It’s estimated that there are more than 120 million parking spaces in the United States. That’s a lot of land, and at an estimated $12,000-per-space cost in a parking garage, that’s a lot of money.

The industrial, business and office parks of the ’70s and ’80s continued the zoning patterns of the ’50s that segregated land uses. Your office wasn’t near your home, which wasn’t near your favorite restaurant, which wasn’t near any shopping. You had a car to take you all the places you wanted and needed to go.

Circle Centre mall began the evolution for downtown Indianapolis. The naysayers—and there were more than a few—looked at the ever-expanding hole in the ground and argued that nobody would ever drive downtown to shop, let alone to have dinner (unless it was at St. Elmo Steakhouse), and certainly never live there.

So much for that theory. It turns out all those things that studies say young people want are what a whole lot of other people want now, too.

Second, we can choose to be leaders in community rethinking and planning. We can embrace creativity, eschew “BANANA” thinking (build absolutely nothing anywhere near anybody) and create enviable, sought-after business spaces that will attract and retain businesses and their harder-to-please employees.

Finally, we can face up to the fact that winning business communities have public transit alternatives.

Ensuring central Indiana becomes a leading site for business attraction takes leadership, planning, creativity and funding. But it’s a lot easier and considerably cheaper than creating that ocean view.•


Merhoff is president of the Carmel Chamber of Commerce.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1