IBJNews

Office stats don't tell full story of market's recovery

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Vacancy rates for multi-tenant office buildings ticked up and absorption slipped in the first quarter, according to statistics compiled by two of three of the city’s major brokerages. But market observers say the negative numbers obscure positive trends in the local market.

The local office of Cassidy Turley reported negative absorption of 98,000 square feet in its first-quarter office report. Most of that occurred in the central business district. The suburban market accounted for 29,000 square feet of the total.

The central business district vacancy rate jumped a half-point, from 17.1 percent at the end of last year to 17.6 percent March 31. The suburban rate grew to 22.5 percent from 22.3 percent.

In spite of the numbers, “I can’t envision a scenario where we’re going to end the year in negative territory,” said Jason W. Tolliver, Cassidy Turley’s research director.

Tolliver said the pace of leasing activity is the best he’s seen in 18 to 24 months. He attributed the negative absorption to corporate tenants following through on belt-tightening they decided to do a year or more ago.

Summit Realty Group also reported slippage in the numbers but predicts better times ahead for the local office market. Summit, a Cushman & Wakefield affiliate, reported almost 70,000 square feet of negative absorption, more than half of that occurring downtown. The vacancy rate for the market was essentially flat at 22.4 percent.

Tim Norton, Summit’s executive vice president, attributed some of the negative absorption to companies' continuing to downsize. Another factor is companies that are moving out of multi-tenant buildings into buildings they’ve purchased.

But there are reasons to be optimistic, Norton said. Among them is the number of companies shopping for space compared with a year ago, when most tenants were still sitting on the sidelines.

Now they’re back in the game and are signing longer-term leases than they had been in the depths of the recession. Before the recession, the average deal length was about five years. Interest in such deals has returned, and some companies are locking in space for 10 to 15 years, he said.

Although tenant activity is strong, some building owners are still vulnerable to losing their buildings, which could hurt the market, Norton said. Properties in default, or with no cash to make tenant improvements, often cause tenants to move to other leased space or leave the rental market entirely.

CB Richard Ellis was the only one of the three brokerage firms that reported positive absorption in the quarter. It reported positive absorption of more than 25,000 square feet in the downtown area and almost 14,000 square feet in the suburbs.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Subleases
    The first wave of the downturn resulted in companies going bankrupt, which in essence cancelled the lease and led to a spike in vacancies. The companies that have survived have most likely cut staff, but can't get out of there leases, thus the relative stabalizing of the vacancy rate. As these leases roll, if they are renewed at all, they will be renewed for smaller spaces to reflect the smaller workforce.

    Bottom line, I think it will be quite a while before vacancy rates show any significant improvement.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Doug Henning!

  2. These guy were thugs — they grew up in freaking Haughville! Smh, sigh. If the mayor needs/wants "quality" Black Hoosiers who are NOT corrupt, give me a call — I know plenty. Land bank info here - http://www.kubepharm.com/indylandbank/IndyLandBank.html

  3. Magician and illusionist!

  4. The basic idea of nice apartments with parking and retail is a good one, but this design seems overwhelmingly big/tall for Broad Ripple. The size could be disguised a bit with lots of big trees/landscaping, but the complex is too massive to blend in easily. That section of canal between College and Westfield will also need to be upgraded on both sides. Nice apartments facing onto a nice promenade with shade trees/plantings could bring together the canal towpath/Monon recreation, the outdoor seating at existing restaurants, and this project into something that upgrades the whole area. A plan for the whole stretch makes more sense than facing nice new housing onto what looks like a ditch. Is there a plan? Does the public have input? Who pays? The apartment idea seems to be reasonable, but Whole Foods is not a good idea for appropriate retail. Besides the store being physically too big, there are already Fresh Market at 54xCollege and Whole Foods in Nora for fancy groceries. Good Earth and Kroger are within walking distance of the Shell site. There are at least 7 grocery stores within a safe bike ride. Whole Foods would add nothing but traffic congestion. This design is on the right track, but there needs to be more work done to ensure that it blends in with and enhances the existing community. A project that large will set a tone for that whole part of town. It could be a real asset, but only if done right.

  5. I did not move to Zionsville to live in Carmel. This and the subsequent developments to follow will ensure a vanilla uniformity of strip malls and apartment buildings as we seek to bring our town down to the least common denominator. We were warned before recent elections that pro-development council members would make sure their friends (landowners and developers) would be able to make their millions off of the exploitation of Zionsville. Why in God's name would we sell out the best preserved small town in the State of Indiana?

ADVERTISEMENT