IBJNews

Office stats don't tell full story of market's recovery

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Vacancy rates for multi-tenant office buildings ticked up and absorption slipped in the first quarter, according to statistics compiled by two of three of the city’s major brokerages. But market observers say the negative numbers obscure positive trends in the local market.

The local office of Cassidy Turley reported negative absorption of 98,000 square feet in its first-quarter office report. Most of that occurred in the central business district. The suburban market accounted for 29,000 square feet of the total.

The central business district vacancy rate jumped a half-point, from 17.1 percent at the end of last year to 17.6 percent March 31. The suburban rate grew to 22.5 percent from 22.3 percent.

In spite of the numbers, “I can’t envision a scenario where we’re going to end the year in negative territory,” said Jason W. Tolliver, Cassidy Turley’s research director.

Tolliver said the pace of leasing activity is the best he’s seen in 18 to 24 months. He attributed the negative absorption to corporate tenants following through on belt-tightening they decided to do a year or more ago.

Summit Realty Group also reported slippage in the numbers but predicts better times ahead for the local office market. Summit, a Cushman & Wakefield affiliate, reported almost 70,000 square feet of negative absorption, more than half of that occurring downtown. The vacancy rate for the market was essentially flat at 22.4 percent.

Tim Norton, Summit’s executive vice president, attributed some of the negative absorption to companies' continuing to downsize. Another factor is companies that are moving out of multi-tenant buildings into buildings they’ve purchased.

But there are reasons to be optimistic, Norton said. Among them is the number of companies shopping for space compared with a year ago, when most tenants were still sitting on the sidelines.

Now they’re back in the game and are signing longer-term leases than they had been in the depths of the recession. Before the recession, the average deal length was about five years. Interest in such deals has returned, and some companies are locking in space for 10 to 15 years, he said.

Although tenant activity is strong, some building owners are still vulnerable to losing their buildings, which could hurt the market, Norton said. Properties in default, or with no cash to make tenant improvements, often cause tenants to move to other leased space or leave the rental market entirely.

CB Richard Ellis was the only one of the three brokerage firms that reported positive absorption in the quarter. It reported positive absorption of more than 25,000 square feet in the downtown area and almost 14,000 square feet in the suburbs.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Subleases
    The first wave of the downturn resulted in companies going bankrupt, which in essence cancelled the lease and led to a spike in vacancies. The companies that have survived have most likely cut staff, but can't get out of there leases, thus the relative stabalizing of the vacancy rate. As these leases roll, if they are renewed at all, they will be renewed for smaller spaces to reflect the smaller workforce.

    Bottom line, I think it will be quite a while before vacancy rates show any significant improvement.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT