IBJNews

Office stats don't tell full story of market's recovery

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Vacancy rates for multi-tenant office buildings ticked up and absorption slipped in the first quarter, according to statistics compiled by two of three of the city’s major brokerages. But market observers say the negative numbers obscure positive trends in the local market.

The local office of Cassidy Turley reported negative absorption of 98,000 square feet in its first-quarter office report. Most of that occurred in the central business district. The suburban market accounted for 29,000 square feet of the total.

The central business district vacancy rate jumped a half-point, from 17.1 percent at the end of last year to 17.6 percent March 31. The suburban rate grew to 22.5 percent from 22.3 percent.

In spite of the numbers, “I can’t envision a scenario where we’re going to end the year in negative territory,” said Jason W. Tolliver, Cassidy Turley’s research director.

Tolliver said the pace of leasing activity is the best he’s seen in 18 to 24 months. He attributed the negative absorption to corporate tenants following through on belt-tightening they decided to do a year or more ago.

Summit Realty Group also reported slippage in the numbers but predicts better times ahead for the local office market. Summit, a Cushman & Wakefield affiliate, reported almost 70,000 square feet of negative absorption, more than half of that occurring downtown. The vacancy rate for the market was essentially flat at 22.4 percent.

Tim Norton, Summit’s executive vice president, attributed some of the negative absorption to companies' continuing to downsize. Another factor is companies that are moving out of multi-tenant buildings into buildings they’ve purchased.

But there are reasons to be optimistic, Norton said. Among them is the number of companies shopping for space compared with a year ago, when most tenants were still sitting on the sidelines.

Now they’re back in the game and are signing longer-term leases than they had been in the depths of the recession. Before the recession, the average deal length was about five years. Interest in such deals has returned, and some companies are locking in space for 10 to 15 years, he said.

Although tenant activity is strong, some building owners are still vulnerable to losing their buildings, which could hurt the market, Norton said. Properties in default, or with no cash to make tenant improvements, often cause tenants to move to other leased space or leave the rental market entirely.

CB Richard Ellis was the only one of the three brokerage firms that reported positive absorption in the quarter. It reported positive absorption of more than 25,000 square feet in the downtown area and almost 14,000 square feet in the suburbs.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Subleases
    The first wave of the downturn resulted in companies going bankrupt, which in essence cancelled the lease and led to a spike in vacancies. The companies that have survived have most likely cut staff, but can't get out of there leases, thus the relative stabalizing of the vacancy rate. As these leases roll, if they are renewed at all, they will be renewed for smaller spaces to reflect the smaller workforce.

    Bottom line, I think it will be quite a while before vacancy rates show any significant improvement.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. This is still my favorite Mexican restaurant in town. What I do love about the new version is it is much quieter than the most recent version. TV's were off, the music wasn't too loud, and the wait staff were not hyperactive like they had been the past few times I had been there. I just wish they would bring back the MOLE for the enchiladas!

  2. Not a bad paper. There is a need for local community news and city government issues. Don't really need the owner's constant national political rants. We all know where they stand by now.

  3. What nice people. Menard should've known better than to team up with the guy who robbed and drove Conseco to ashes. I'm surprised Timothy Durham isn't involved in this.

  4. Hello, I am Maris Peters, currently living in Texas city, USA. I am a widow at the moment with three kids and i was stuck in a financial situation in August 2014 and i needed to refinance and pay my bills. I tried seeking loans from various loan Companies both private and corporate but never with success, and most banks declined my credit. But as God would have it, I was introduced to a Man of God a private loan lender who gave me a loan of $65,000USD and today am a business owner and my kids are doing well at the moment, if you must contact any firm or company with reference to securing a loan without collateral , no credit check, no co signer with just 2% interest rate and better repayment plans and schedule, please contact Mr William David. He doesn’t know that am doing this but am so happy now and i decided to let people know more about him and also i want God to bless him more.You can contact him through his email: Davidloanfirm@yahoo.com

  5. It is beyond me how anyone can think this was a "bad deal" for the state! If they could take the money back then, yes, but they can't! Protections were built in the agreement. Now, if they roll the roads up and take them away, I will agree that it was a bad deal. Otherwise, the only way to have paid for the infrastructure that was badly needed was for the state to issue bonds....that is a four letter synonym for debt folks!!

ADVERTISEMENT