Owner rejects bids for western Indiana historic site

Associated Press
October 26, 2012
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The owner of western Indiana historic site Billie Creek Village said he's decided not to sell it piecemeal to auction bidders who only wanted parts of the property, and he hopes to find a buyer who will reopen the site.

No bids were made for the entire 70-acre property along U.S. 36 near Rockville at last week's auction. Top bids of $250,000 were made for the village site, $280,000 for its adjourning farmland and $10,000 for the parking lot area.

"I want to keep the village all together. I don't want it split up into three parcels," Charlie Cooper, owner of the property and chairman of the not-for-profit Billie Creek Village Inc., told the Tribune-Star for a story Friday.

The village that was started in the 1960s includes a wooden covered bridge, several 1800s-era buildings that were moved there, a party pavilion and antiques, equipment and inventory from a general store.

Cooper bought a controlling interest in the village about four years ago when it was struggling financially.

Cooper said he's been approached by people by people interested in keeping the village open.

"So I'll get something worked out with it," he said.

Cooper, who turned 81 Tuesday, said he's simply too old to continue running the operation. The retired Parke County sheriff and bank president farms 1,000 acres of land with his son and said it's time for someone else to manage the site.

The village about 25 miles north of Terre Haute is closed for the season, but is continuing to host special events such as a wedding scheduled for this weekend.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now