IBJNews

Pfizer won’t break up animal unit for potential Lilly bid

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Pfizer Inc., the world’s biggest drugmaker, said it isn’t interested in breaking up its animal health unit after Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly and Co. expressed interest in buying some of its products.

Lilly, which had $1.39 billion in sales from animal-health products last year, is monitoring Pfizer’s plans to divest its unit and will pursue assets deemed of interest, Chief Financial Officer Derica Rice said in a conference call Thursday. Pfizer wants a sale or spinoff of the unit and doesn’t foresee breaking it up, said Joan Campion, a company spokeswoman.

Pfizer CEO Ian Read said on July 7 he is divesting the company’s animal health and nutrition units to buy back shares and focus on developing new drugs. The units may fetch $22 billion, according to Seamus Fernandez, an analyst at Leerink Swann & Co. Pfizer’s animal health unit had sales last year of $3.48 billion.

“While we are evaluating a variety of options including a sales, spinoff or other transaction, we believe we will favor one overall option rather than dividing assets and business operations,” Campion said in an e-mail Thursday.

Pfizer’s review of its options for the unit will take 12 to 24 months, Campion said. The company doesn’t plan further announcements about the unit until 2012, she said.

“We will watch how that situation evolves, and if there are some assets that become available that we are interested in, yes, we will pursue them,” Lilly’s Rice said in a conference call with analysts. “It is very early to speculate” what type of transaction Pfizer is seeking, he said.

Lilly is interested in expanding its Elanco animal heath unit’s offerings in vaccines and pet products, as well as boosting its presence in Europe, Jeff Simmons, president of the division, said in a June 29 telephone interview. Elanco’s biggest product line is feed additives for cattle and poultry.

“We are going to be opportunistic in animal health,” Simmons said. “We are looking for additional assets. We are not interested in acquiring for the sake of acquiring; it has got to have a strategic element.”

In March, Elanco agreed to acquire Jannsen Animal Health, a subsidiary of New Jersey-based Johnson & Johnson. Terms were not disclosed.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT