IBJNews

Pfizer's Viagra patent partially rejected in Lilly fight

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Pfizer Inc.’s patent on its impotence drug Viagra has been partially rejected after the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office said it wasn’t different enough from a Chinese herb known as Horny Goat Weed.

An appeals board within the agency on Feb. 12 upheld a decision that an element, or claim, of the patent for a method of treating male erectile dysfunction didn’t cover a new invention. The patent claim was key to a patent-infringement suit Pfizer had filed in 2002 against Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly and Co. over its rival Cialis drug. The decision, posted on the PTO’s Web site, can be appealed.

Chris Loder, a Pfizer spokesman, said other elements of the patent remain valid, and the decision “has no effect on Pfizer’s claims relating to Viagra.” He declined to comment on how the decision would affect the suit against Indianapolis- based Lilly.

The lawsuit, in which Pfizer claimed Lilly was infringing the patent, had been put on hold while the patent office review was under way. Bayer AG, which makes the impotence pill Levitra, had also requested the agency take a second look at the patent.

New York-based Pfizer has until April 12 to seek a rehearing from the PTO’s Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, or appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, which specializes in patent law, according to a letter Lilly lawyer Richard K. Herrmann filed yesterday with the federal court in Wilmington, Delaware.

If Pfizer takes no action, the PTO will cancel that element of the patent, Herrmann said in the letter addressed to U.S. District Judge Joseph J. Farnan. The lawyer said the rejected claim was the only one at issue in the litigation.

In its decision, the board said the patent claim was the next logical step up from using the herb Yin Yang Huo, known as Horny Goat Weed, to treat impotence. A chemical ingredient of the herb is a similar type of enzyme inhibitor that’s in Viagra, the board found.

Pfizer had argued there was no evidence the herb treats erectile dysfunction. It also said that treatments using Yin Yang Huo also required “yellow rice wine, genital massage, rest, bathing in an herbal mixture and abstinence from intercourse and therefore does not establish that the treatment effect was due to Yin Yang Huo alone,” according to the board’s report.

The patent expires in 2019, and Pfizer has another patent on Viagra that expires in 2012, according to information on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Web site.

Mark Taylor, a spokesman for Lilly, didn’t immediately return messages seeking comment.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT