IBJNews

Pfizer's Viagra patent partially rejected in Lilly fight

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Pfizer Inc.’s patent on its impotence drug Viagra has been partially rejected after the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office said it wasn’t different enough from a Chinese herb known as Horny Goat Weed.

An appeals board within the agency on Feb. 12 upheld a decision that an element, or claim, of the patent for a method of treating male erectile dysfunction didn’t cover a new invention. The patent claim was key to a patent-infringement suit Pfizer had filed in 2002 against Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly and Co. over its rival Cialis drug. The decision, posted on the PTO’s Web site, can be appealed.

Chris Loder, a Pfizer spokesman, said other elements of the patent remain valid, and the decision “has no effect on Pfizer’s claims relating to Viagra.” He declined to comment on how the decision would affect the suit against Indianapolis- based Lilly.

The lawsuit, in which Pfizer claimed Lilly was infringing the patent, had been put on hold while the patent office review was under way. Bayer AG, which makes the impotence pill Levitra, had also requested the agency take a second look at the patent.

New York-based Pfizer has until April 12 to seek a rehearing from the PTO’s Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, or appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, which specializes in patent law, according to a letter Lilly lawyer Richard K. Herrmann filed yesterday with the federal court in Wilmington, Delaware.

If Pfizer takes no action, the PTO will cancel that element of the patent, Herrmann said in the letter addressed to U.S. District Judge Joseph J. Farnan. The lawyer said the rejected claim was the only one at issue in the litigation.

In its decision, the board said the patent claim was the next logical step up from using the herb Yin Yang Huo, known as Horny Goat Weed, to treat impotence. A chemical ingredient of the herb is a similar type of enzyme inhibitor that’s in Viagra, the board found.

Pfizer had argued there was no evidence the herb treats erectile dysfunction. It also said that treatments using Yin Yang Huo also required “yellow rice wine, genital massage, rest, bathing in an herbal mixture and abstinence from intercourse and therefore does not establish that the treatment effect was due to Yin Yang Huo alone,” according to the board’s report.

The patent expires in 2019, and Pfizer has another patent on Viagra that expires in 2012, according to information on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Web site.

Mark Taylor, a spokesman for Lilly, didn’t immediately return messages seeking comment.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. This is a big help. Thanks for share it here.

  2. Doug Henning!

  3. These guy were thugs — they grew up in freaking Haughville! Smh, sigh. If the mayor needs/wants "quality" Black Hoosiers who are NOT corrupt, give me a call — I know plenty. Land bank info here - http://www.kubepharm.com/indylandbank/IndyLandBank.html

  4. Magician and illusionist!

  5. The basic idea of nice apartments with parking and retail is a good one, but this design seems overwhelmingly big/tall for Broad Ripple. The size could be disguised a bit with lots of big trees/landscaping, but the complex is too massive to blend in easily. That section of canal between College and Westfield will also need to be upgraded on both sides. Nice apartments facing onto a nice promenade with shade trees/plantings could bring together the canal towpath/Monon recreation, the outdoor seating at existing restaurants, and this project into something that upgrades the whole area. A plan for the whole stretch makes more sense than facing nice new housing onto what looks like a ditch. Is there a plan? Does the public have input? Who pays? The apartment idea seems to be reasonable, but Whole Foods is not a good idea for appropriate retail. Besides the store being physically too big, there are already Fresh Market at 54xCollege and Whole Foods in Nora for fancy groceries. Good Earth and Kroger are within walking distance of the Shell site. There are at least 7 grocery stores within a safe bike ride. Whole Foods would add nothing but traffic congestion. This design is on the right track, but there needs to be more work done to ensure that it blends in with and enhances the existing community. A project that large will set a tone for that whole part of town. It could be a real asset, but only if done right.

ADVERTISEMENT