IBJNews

PNC earnings sink on soured home mortgages

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

PNC Financial Services Group Inc. said Wednesday its second-quarter net income shrank 41 percent, as the bank set aside hundreds of millions of dollars to buy back home mortgages.

Pittsburgh-based PNC is the parent company of PNC Bank, which has about 1,200 employees and 88 branches in the Indianapolis area.

PNC and other banks have been buying back soured mortgages from investors who bought them before the financial crisis and now say they were misled about their quality.

The bank said it expects Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to continue demanding that it buy back more residential mortgages. The two government-sponsored agencies own or guarantee about half of U.S. home mortgages.

For the April-June quarter, net income after paying preferred dividends came to $526 million, or 98 cents per share, from $888 million, or $1.67 per share, in the same period last year.

Analysts, on average, expected a profit of $1.14 per share, according to a FactSet poll.

The recent quarter's results included $284 million in costs related to its home loan repurchase obligations.

Revenue rose 1 percent to $3.62 billion from $3.6 billion a year ago. Analysts expected $3.68 billion in revenue.

Net interest income, or income collected on loans, jumped 17 percent to $2.53 billion, boosted by contributions from its March acquisition of RBC Bank (USA), the U.S. retail banking division of the Royal Bank of Canada.

That growth offset a 24 percent drop in non-interest income to $1.1 billion, which largely stemmed from the setting aside of $438 million for mortgage repurchase obligations. The company set aside just $21 million in the year-ago period.

Shares of the bank, which serves institutions as well as consumers, fell 49 cents to $61.10 in premarket trading.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT