IBJNews

Poor economy keeping Wishard project costs down

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Lower commodity prices and cheaper bids submitted by contractors hungry for work are helping managers of the new Wishard Hospital project keep construction costs under budget so far.

With nearly 20 percent of construction bids awarded, accounting for more than $113 million of the entire $606 million construction package, the project is running about $10 million under budget, said Matt Gutwein, president and CEO of Health & Hospital Corp. of Marion County, which owns the hospital.

“We’re not doing a victory dance yet,” Gutwein said. “But so far we are very pleased with the aggressiveness and the competiveness of the bids we’ve awarded."

Gutwein provided the update at Indianapolis City Market on Wednesday morning, about a year after Wishard officials kicked off their campaign for a new hospital. He said the project is proceeding on time and under budget.

The poor economy has dramatically slowed construction activity in central Indiana, which is creating more competition and driving down costs. Likewise, Gutwein said, prices for commodities such as steel and copper are “highly favorable.”

Gutwein plans to have all bids awarded by January.

The new Wishard will feature an 11-story hospital tower adjoining a 200-room ambulatory care building, and a 90-bed emergency department with an adult trauma center. A faculty and administration building and a 2,700-car parking garage also are part of the project.

The 1.2-million-square-foot, 327-bed hospital will be built on 37 acres at the west end of the IUPUI campus. The hospital corporation exercised a land-swap option in November with Indiana University.

The agreement called for Wishard to take control of the hospital site immediately, and then gradually cede ownership of its current hospital site over the next four years.

The land Wishard received contained the old Larue Carter psychiatric hospital facility and the former State Department of Health building, both of which have been torn down.

Old brick and cement from the two buildings was ground up and will be used to fill areas of the construction site, Gutwein said.

Besides awarding demolition bids, Wishard has granted others for utility and foundation work, which includes digging 700 holes as deep as 60 feet to set the cast pilings for the foundation.  

Site and grade preparation will involve raising the land on which the hospital will be built by six feet to help protect against potential flooding.

A bid also has been awarded to Minnesota-based Enclos Corp. to manufacture and apply the façade, or “skin,” to the building. Enclos performed the same work for the Petronas Towers in Malaysia, the tallest twin buildings in the world.

Project managers are ahead of goals to award 15 percent of the work to minorities, 8 percent to women, and 3 percent to veterans. Altogether, the three groups have received nearly 31 percent of all contracts.

Wishard is aiming to achieve the “silver” designation from the United States Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, or LEED, program.

Health & Hospital Corp. is using $661 million in bonds to help finance the $754 million hospital, slated to open at the end of 2013.

Mayor Greg Ballard joined Wishard leaders Wednesday morning to report on the progress of the new hospital.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • apples and oranges
    You can't compare two projects based on facts provided. The "new" hospital in Chicago (which btw looks awful...especially compared to the old hospital it replaced) has more beds, but square footage is roughly the same. The project in Chicago involved bulding parking as well (but less spaces), and Indy project includes faculty and administration building. Then you could talk about different bed use, inflation, etc. Actual prices for the hospital in Chicago were contracted probably in 1998/1999. It was finished in 2002. It's really hard and meaningless to compare the two projects.
  • Ivory Tower
    Join the real word.

    Commercial builders and building material costs are MUCH lower now than in 2002. Considering a two year building period, the Chicago hospital would have been built at peak prices in an expensive metro market.
  • Get a Clue
    Gee, do you think medical costs and construction costs have risen since 2002? My guess would be YES.
    • New Hospital Smaller & More Expensive?
      I thought Wishard needed a new hospital because they were running out of space?

      Current Wishard Hospital - 356 Hospital Beds

      New Wishard Hospital - 327 Hospital Beds

      29 Fewer Hospital Beds?

    • Under Budget?????
      Wishard is building a new 327 bed hospital for $754 million.

      Cook County Hospital (John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital) in Chicago replaced a sprawling 13-building campus, whose main pavilion was opened in 1914. They spent approximately $626.3 million (including cost over runs to replace all the medical equipment) to create a 464 bed hospital that serves the same type of clients as Wishard. It open in 2002.

      They appear to be at least $128 million over budget and short 137 hospital beds.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

      2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

      3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

      4. Send them back NOW.

      5. deport now

      ADVERTISEMENT