IBJNews

Poor economy keeping Wishard project costs down

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Lower commodity prices and cheaper bids submitted by contractors hungry for work are helping managers of the new Wishard Hospital project keep construction costs under budget so far.

With nearly 20 percent of construction bids awarded, accounting for more than $113 million of the entire $606 million construction package, the project is running about $10 million under budget, said Matt Gutwein, president and CEO of Health & Hospital Corp. of Marion County, which owns the hospital.

“We’re not doing a victory dance yet,” Gutwein said. “But so far we are very pleased with the aggressiveness and the competiveness of the bids we’ve awarded."

Gutwein provided the update at Indianapolis City Market on Wednesday morning, about a year after Wishard officials kicked off their campaign for a new hospital. He said the project is proceeding on time and under budget.

The poor economy has dramatically slowed construction activity in central Indiana, which is creating more competition and driving down costs. Likewise, Gutwein said, prices for commodities such as steel and copper are “highly favorable.”

Gutwein plans to have all bids awarded by January.

The new Wishard will feature an 11-story hospital tower adjoining a 200-room ambulatory care building, and a 90-bed emergency department with an adult trauma center. A faculty and administration building and a 2,700-car parking garage also are part of the project.

The 1.2-million-square-foot, 327-bed hospital will be built on 37 acres at the west end of the IUPUI campus. The hospital corporation exercised a land-swap option in November with Indiana University.

The agreement called for Wishard to take control of the hospital site immediately, and then gradually cede ownership of its current hospital site over the next four years.

The land Wishard received contained the old Larue Carter psychiatric hospital facility and the former State Department of Health building, both of which have been torn down.

Old brick and cement from the two buildings was ground up and will be used to fill areas of the construction site, Gutwein said.

Besides awarding demolition bids, Wishard has granted others for utility and foundation work, which includes digging 700 holes as deep as 60 feet to set the cast pilings for the foundation.  

Site and grade preparation will involve raising the land on which the hospital will be built by six feet to help protect against potential flooding.

A bid also has been awarded to Minnesota-based Enclos Corp. to manufacture and apply the façade, or “skin,” to the building. Enclos performed the same work for the Petronas Towers in Malaysia, the tallest twin buildings in the world.

Project managers are ahead of goals to award 15 percent of the work to minorities, 8 percent to women, and 3 percent to veterans. Altogether, the three groups have received nearly 31 percent of all contracts.

Wishard is aiming to achieve the “silver” designation from the United States Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, or LEED, program.

Health & Hospital Corp. is using $661 million in bonds to help finance the $754 million hospital, slated to open at the end of 2013.

Mayor Greg Ballard joined Wishard leaders Wednesday morning to report on the progress of the new hospital.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • apples and oranges
    You can't compare two projects based on facts provided. The "new" hospital in Chicago (which btw looks awful...especially compared to the old hospital it replaced) has more beds, but square footage is roughly the same. The project in Chicago involved bulding parking as well (but less spaces), and Indy project includes faculty and administration building. Then you could talk about different bed use, inflation, etc. Actual prices for the hospital in Chicago were contracted probably in 1998/1999. It was finished in 2002. It's really hard and meaningless to compare the two projects.
  • Ivory Tower
    Join the real word.

    Commercial builders and building material costs are MUCH lower now than in 2002. Considering a two year building period, the Chicago hospital would have been built at peak prices in an expensive metro market.
  • Get a Clue
    Gee, do you think medical costs and construction costs have risen since 2002? My guess would be YES.
    • New Hospital Smaller & More Expensive?
      I thought Wishard needed a new hospital because they were running out of space?

      Current Wishard Hospital - 356 Hospital Beds

      New Wishard Hospital - 327 Hospital Beds

      29 Fewer Hospital Beds?

    • Under Budget?????
      Wishard is building a new 327 bed hospital for $754 million.

      Cook County Hospital (John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital) in Chicago replaced a sprawling 13-building campus, whose main pavilion was opened in 1914. They spent approximately $626.3 million (including cost over runs to replace all the medical equipment) to create a 464 bed hospital that serves the same type of clients as Wishard. It open in 2002.

      They appear to be at least $128 million over budget and short 137 hospital beds.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. liek the rest of America

      2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

      3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

      4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

      5. whoa!

      ADVERTISEMENT