IBJNews

Profit plummets at ITT Educational, but tops analyst expectations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

First-quarter profit plunged nearly 29 percent at ITT Educational Services Inc., but still exceeded Wall Street’s dismal expectations.

The Carmel-based operator of for-profit technical colleges earned $61.1 million during the quarter ended March 31, down from $85.4 million in the same quarter a year earlier.

On a per-share basis, ITT Educational’s quarterly earnings fell from $2.91 a year ago to $2.38.

Wall Street analysts expected earnings per share of $2.13, according to a survey by Thomson Reuters. ITT was able to lifts its earnings by 8 cents per share by repurchasing more than 2 million shares of its common stock during the quarter.

Market expectations have been low mainly because enrollment of new students has been declining for seven straight quarters at ITT’s more than 140 campuses around the country. A recession-induced wave of students that flocked to the schools has been ebbing.

New-student enrollment declined 17 percent in the first quarter compared with a year ago, to 18,067 students. Overall enrollment fell 15 percent, to 71,123.

The Obama administration and Senate Democrats have focused a bright light on the recruiting practices of for-profit colleges and the debt loads their students rack up. That attention also slowed enrollment.

ITT’s revenue in the quarter fell 11 percent, to $341.8 million, but that also exceeded analysts’ expectations. They predicted revenue of $335 million.

The higher revenue was driven in part by ITT’s ability to generate more revenue from each of its students. Revenue per student rose 3 percent compared with the first quarter last year, to $4,666.

Shares of ITT Educational’s stock closed Wednesday at $62.41 apiece. The price has risen nearly 10 percent this year.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT