IBJNews

TAYLOR: Reform will drive demand for health care facilities

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

TaylorPresident Obama put an end to most of the uncertainty surrounding health care reform when he signed the $938 billion reform law in March. Now, look for executives of hospitals, health care systems and physician practice groups, with improving economic winds at their backs, to move forward with decisions on real estate leasing and capital improvement projects.

Health care providers and real estate firms stand to gain from reform in the long term because an estimated 32 million uninsured Americans will gradually obtain medical coverage by 2019; this broader coverage will boost demand for health care facilities.

If there was any upside to the recession, it was that the forced lull in building gave providers time to thoroughly re-evaluate their facilities plans. Perhaps as a result of all that strategizing, there has been a noticeable uptick in the level of health care real estate development activity this year.

BremnerDuke is receiving a growing number of requests for proposals, and actual development projects are moving forward. Growth might be hampered by a fragile economy and limited access to capital, but health care is still a demand-driven business and that demand can’t be deferred indefinitely—despite short-term economic and regulatory uncertainty.

Health care reform will intensify two already-powerful trends of an aging population and the shift to outpatient care.

With baby boomers starting to turn 65 next year, the U.S. Census Bureau projects that the number of Americans age 65 and older will rise by a whopping 36 percent from 2010 to 2020, compared with a 9-percent increase for the population as a whole.

These seniors are not only one of the fastest-growing segments of the U.S. population, but they also happen to be heavy users of health care services.

Ultimately, greater demand from boomers will require more health care facilities. What kind of facilities? That brings us to our second major demand driver: the continuing shift of health care services to outpatient settings.

The number of U.S. hospital beds declined to 808,069 in 2007 from slightly more than 1 million in 1982, according to the American Hospital Association. Put another way, the number of hospital beds per 1,000 people declined to 2.75 from 4.37 during the same period.

That can only mean more health care services are being delivered in medical office buildings, ambulatory surgery facilities and other outpatient facilities. What’s more, the shift to outpatient care is likely to accelerate.

Based on population, medical, economic and technological trends, demand for outpatient services is projected to increase nearly 22 percent by 2019 while demand for inpatient services will remain flat, according to a recent forecast by Sg2, a health care information systems firm.

Those long-term trends are irrefutable. Moreover, the new health care reform law will probably magnify their impact.

Early in the health care reform debate, when it first appeared possible that medical coverage might be extended to as many as two-thirds of America’s 46 million uninsured citizens, the national real estate firm Marcus & Millichap projected that demand for additional medical office space could be as much as 61.9 million square feet, based on the current ratio of 1.9 square feet per insured individual.

Now, with 32 million Americans set to join the ranks of the insured, those projections could become a reality. Consequently, more seniors—and individuals of all ages—will qualify for coverage, making them even more likely to seek regular medical care.

The uninsured consume only about 60 percent of health care services used by insured people, according to a recent estimate from the U.S. Congressional Budget Office. But that usage could increase 25 percent to 60 percent if those folks were covered by the equivalent of a typical employment-based plan, the CBO says.

Unemployment remains high, credit remains tight for many borrowers, and there are still concerns about the ultimate effects of health care reform.

However, reform inevitably will increase demand for health care design, construction and development services.•

__________

Taylor is an executive vice president at BremnerDuke Health Care Real Estate. Views expressed here are the writer’s.


ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. City-County Councilor Angela Mansfield and Bob Lutz have a case of wishful thinking.

    They obviously don't really care about the cost.

    They should.

    Extending Federal Benefits to Same-Sex Couples Will Cost $898M, CBO Says

    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/12/22/extending-federal-benefits-sex-couples-cost-m-cbo-says/

  2. Brett, be careful what you lie about, the truth always comes out.

    "IMS's George Honored: Tony George, Indianapolis Motor Speedway president and chief executive officer, received the inaugural Pioneering and Innovation Award at the Autosport Awards Dec. 5 in London for his leadership in the development of the Steel and Foam Energy Reduction (SAFER) Barrier. George received the award at the annual gala at the Grosvenor House on behalf of the creators of the SAFER Barrier from Prince Salman Bin Hamad Al Khalifa, the leader of the Bahrain International Grand Prix circuit. This is the fourth major award that has been presented to honor George and the SAFER Barrier development team. The SAFER Barrier also received the Louis Schwitzer Award, SEMA Motorsports Engineering Award and GM Racing Pioneer Award in 2002. The SAFER Barrier was installed in all four turns of the Indianapolis Motor Speedway a pioneer in safety for drivers, cars and tracks -- in time for the 86th Indianapolis 500 in 2002. It since has been installed at more than a dozen other tracks, and the latest iteration will be installed at the Speedway in the spring.(IMS PR), see more on my Indy Track News page.(12-7-2004)"

    As far as the cart safety team, I cannot find anything on its date of creation. The Delphi Safety team was created in 1996. For some reason there is not much info out there on defunct racing series.

  3. Great article Anthony. Glad IMS is finally being run like a business and not a personal check book to finance the "Vision".

    Things are looking up but 15 years of scorched earth won't be fixed overnight. Unfortunately the TV ratings are still poor and that won't change anytime soon with the brilliant 10 year contract signed under the former regime.

  4. Brett not sure why you wonder what he said in his quote. "''I would like to jump in a time machine, go back to 1995, and tell the owners and Tony George not to split,'' Franchitti said. ''As soon as my time machine is done, I know where I'm going.''"

    Pretty clear, he would love to go back and tell TG and the team owners not to split.

    I am not sure there is anyone who wanted the split, and I don't think there is anyone who would not like to go back and prevent the split. But, as has been discussed ad nauseum, without the split carts management by team owners would have run all of ow racing into bankruptcy. If cart had such a wonderful product, then losing IMS would not have forced it into bankruptcy. If NASCAR lost Daytona or Charlotte, it would not fail like cart did.

    Truth,

    So you predicted that cart would go into bankruptcy and cease to exist while Indycar would continue on? I missed that prediction.

  5. I want to live in a city that has a garage structure to be proud of for it's innovating design!

ADVERTISEMENT