IBJNews

TAYLOR: Reform will drive demand for health care facilities

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

TaylorPresident Obama put an end to most of the uncertainty surrounding health care reform when he signed the $938 billion reform law in March. Now, look for executives of hospitals, health care systems and physician practice groups, with improving economic winds at their backs, to move forward with decisions on real estate leasing and capital improvement projects.

Health care providers and real estate firms stand to gain from reform in the long term because an estimated 32 million uninsured Americans will gradually obtain medical coverage by 2019; this broader coverage will boost demand for health care facilities.

If there was any upside to the recession, it was that the forced lull in building gave providers time to thoroughly re-evaluate their facilities plans. Perhaps as a result of all that strategizing, there has been a noticeable uptick in the level of health care real estate development activity this year.

BremnerDuke is receiving a growing number of requests for proposals, and actual development projects are moving forward. Growth might be hampered by a fragile economy and limited access to capital, but health care is still a demand-driven business and that demand can’t be deferred indefinitely—despite short-term economic and regulatory uncertainty.

Health care reform will intensify two already-powerful trends of an aging population and the shift to outpatient care.

With baby boomers starting to turn 65 next year, the U.S. Census Bureau projects that the number of Americans age 65 and older will rise by a whopping 36 percent from 2010 to 2020, compared with a 9-percent increase for the population as a whole.

These seniors are not only one of the fastest-growing segments of the U.S. population, but they also happen to be heavy users of health care services.

Ultimately, greater demand from boomers will require more health care facilities. What kind of facilities? That brings us to our second major demand driver: the continuing shift of health care services to outpatient settings.

The number of U.S. hospital beds declined to 808,069 in 2007 from slightly more than 1 million in 1982, according to the American Hospital Association. Put another way, the number of hospital beds per 1,000 people declined to 2.75 from 4.37 during the same period.

That can only mean more health care services are being delivered in medical office buildings, ambulatory surgery facilities and other outpatient facilities. What’s more, the shift to outpatient care is likely to accelerate.

Based on population, medical, economic and technological trends, demand for outpatient services is projected to increase nearly 22 percent by 2019 while demand for inpatient services will remain flat, according to a recent forecast by Sg2, a health care information systems firm.

Those long-term trends are irrefutable. Moreover, the new health care reform law will probably magnify their impact.

Early in the health care reform debate, when it first appeared possible that medical coverage might be extended to as many as two-thirds of America’s 46 million uninsured citizens, the national real estate firm Marcus & Millichap projected that demand for additional medical office space could be as much as 61.9 million square feet, based on the current ratio of 1.9 square feet per insured individual.

Now, with 32 million Americans set to join the ranks of the insured, those projections could become a reality. Consequently, more seniors—and individuals of all ages—will qualify for coverage, making them even more likely to seek regular medical care.

The uninsured consume only about 60 percent of health care services used by insured people, according to a recent estimate from the U.S. Congressional Budget Office. But that usage could increase 25 percent to 60 percent if those folks were covered by the equivalent of a typical employment-based plan, the CBO says.

Unemployment remains high, credit remains tight for many borrowers, and there are still concerns about the ultimate effects of health care reform.

However, reform inevitably will increase demand for health care design, construction and development services.•

__________

Taylor is an executive vice president at BremnerDuke Health Care Real Estate. Views expressed here are the writer’s.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT