IBJNews

TAYLOR: Reform will drive demand for health care facilities

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

TaylorPresident Obama put an end to most of the uncertainty surrounding health care reform when he signed the $938 billion reform law in March. Now, look for executives of hospitals, health care systems and physician practice groups, with improving economic winds at their backs, to move forward with decisions on real estate leasing and capital improvement projects.

Health care providers and real estate firms stand to gain from reform in the long term because an estimated 32 million uninsured Americans will gradually obtain medical coverage by 2019; this broader coverage will boost demand for health care facilities.

If there was any upside to the recession, it was that the forced lull in building gave providers time to thoroughly re-evaluate their facilities plans. Perhaps as a result of all that strategizing, there has been a noticeable uptick in the level of health care real estate development activity this year.

BremnerDuke is receiving a growing number of requests for proposals, and actual development projects are moving forward. Growth might be hampered by a fragile economy and limited access to capital, but health care is still a demand-driven business and that demand can’t be deferred indefinitely—despite short-term economic and regulatory uncertainty.

Health care reform will intensify two already-powerful trends of an aging population and the shift to outpatient care.

With baby boomers starting to turn 65 next year, the U.S. Census Bureau projects that the number of Americans age 65 and older will rise by a whopping 36 percent from 2010 to 2020, compared with a 9-percent increase for the population as a whole.

These seniors are not only one of the fastest-growing segments of the U.S. population, but they also happen to be heavy users of health care services.

Ultimately, greater demand from boomers will require more health care facilities. What kind of facilities? That brings us to our second major demand driver: the continuing shift of health care services to outpatient settings.

The number of U.S. hospital beds declined to 808,069 in 2007 from slightly more than 1 million in 1982, according to the American Hospital Association. Put another way, the number of hospital beds per 1,000 people declined to 2.75 from 4.37 during the same period.

That can only mean more health care services are being delivered in medical office buildings, ambulatory surgery facilities and other outpatient facilities. What’s more, the shift to outpatient care is likely to accelerate.

Based on population, medical, economic and technological trends, demand for outpatient services is projected to increase nearly 22 percent by 2019 while demand for inpatient services will remain flat, according to a recent forecast by Sg2, a health care information systems firm.

Those long-term trends are irrefutable. Moreover, the new health care reform law will probably magnify their impact.

Early in the health care reform debate, when it first appeared possible that medical coverage might be extended to as many as two-thirds of America’s 46 million uninsured citizens, the national real estate firm Marcus & Millichap projected that demand for additional medical office space could be as much as 61.9 million square feet, based on the current ratio of 1.9 square feet per insured individual.

Now, with 32 million Americans set to join the ranks of the insured, those projections could become a reality. Consequently, more seniors—and individuals of all ages—will qualify for coverage, making them even more likely to seek regular medical care.

The uninsured consume only about 60 percent of health care services used by insured people, according to a recent estimate from the U.S. Congressional Budget Office. But that usage could increase 25 percent to 60 percent if those folks were covered by the equivalent of a typical employment-based plan, the CBO says.

Unemployment remains high, credit remains tight for many borrowers, and there are still concerns about the ultimate effects of health care reform.

However, reform inevitably will increase demand for health care design, construction and development services.•

__________

Taylor is an executive vice president at BremnerDuke Health Care Real Estate. Views expressed here are the writer’s.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT