IBJNews

Republic Airways blames fuel costs for $15M quarterly loss

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Republic Airways Holdings Inc. late Monday reported that it lost nearly $15 million in the second quarter, as high fuel prices continued to drag down its results.

The company said it spent nearly $227 million on aircraft fuel in the quarter, compared with $161 million in the same period a year earlier.

Republic said it lost $14.9 million, or 31 cents per share, on $739.7 million in revenue. In the second quarter of 2010, the company reported a profit of $2.6 million, or 8 cents a share, on revenue of $683.3 million.

The Indianapolis-based company has been vulnerable to fluctuations in fuel prices since buying Frontier Airlines and Midwest Airlines two years ago. It previously had specialized in fixed-fee contract flying for other airlines, which reimbursed it for fuel costs.

On June 10, Republic reached an agreement with pilots that provides them a stake in Frontier in return for pay freezes and other concessions. Republic agreed to attract other equity investors to the airline and to reduce its stake below 50 percent by 2015. Republic negotiated the pact as part of restructuring plan aimed at saving $120 million.

Results for the second quarter were affected by a series of one-time items. Excluding those items, the Frontier and Midwest operations—which now operate under the Frontier banner—posted a pretax loss of $32.8 million.

Excluding one-time items, Republic’s contract-flying business earned $17.6 million before taxes.

In Monday's announcement, the company said it expects that third-quarter revenue and pre-tax profit each will be reduced by about $10 million because of a severe hailstorm at Denver International Airport on July 13 that damaged 22 of its aircraft and forced it to cancel about 250 flights.

Republic shares are down sharply from the $10.39 high reached right before the Frontier and Midwest acquisitions. They closed Monday at $4.27 each, down 6 cents on the day.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Republic
    Republic,
    Should just cut ties with Fronteir. Fronteir has done nothing but bring the company down and add cost. Fronteir employee drug there company down and now are dragging Republic. Before Frontier always in the black. Fronteir people do not know how to run a airline they just act like it.Republic is a great company Frontier not at all
  • republicFIVE
    Read this
  • need crews
    Maybe Republic could make a profit if they did not cancel flights like yesterday because they had no crew. A perfect sold out (or close) plane sat idle because Republic did not have a crew? You would think they would have stand by crews at their Indy hub. Not only did Republic not have equipment sit idle and lose revenue, they also caused unnecessary disruptions to the lives of those passangers that they stranded.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

ADVERTISEMENT