Ritter's buyer embarking on custard chain turnaround

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The once-formidable Ritter’s Frozen Custard chain could be on the cusp of a turnaround under new ownership that is embarking on a plan to have 100 locations within five years.

New York-based TruFoods, which bought the company in May 2008 for an undisclosed price, has spent the past two years revamping the business model and  now is seeking new franchisees.

TruFoods should have commitments signed for about 10 new franchises in 2010, with a goal of opening four of those by the end of the year, said Gary Occhiogrosso, the company’s chief development officer.

“We basically took a step back,” Occhiogrosso said. “We took a look at what worked and a good focused look at things that weren’t working as well.”

Ritter’s has 17 stores in Indiana, including nine in the Indianapolis area. Overall, it has 31 locations in six states, or about half as many as the chain had just five years ago before problems began plaguing its former owners.

Hoosiers have been passionate about Ritter’s handmade frozen custard ever since it launched in Franklin more than 20 years ago. Yet while the ice cream is sweet, the story of the former mom-and-pop company’s attempt to grow is anything but.

John Ritter and his wife, Bonny, started the company in 1989. At the time, it was a novelty—frozen custard made fresh each day inside a retro-looking circular building that featured only outdoor seating.

The chain boasted 18 locations in 2000. By 2005—its peak—it had 60.

But the company’s former CEO, Saul Lemke, who acquired control in 2003 (with the Ritter family retaining a major stake), was roundly criticized by franchisees for expanding too quickly while neglecting daily operations.

Add an onslaught of new competitors into the mix and you have the ingredients for a rocky road.

The Ritter family reacquired control in 2004, installing John’s son Bob as CEO. But the damage had been done.

TruFoods specializes in buying and turning around underperforming brands. The company’s other holdings include Arthur Treacher’s Fish & Chips, Pudgie’s Famous Chicken and Wall Street Deli.

The handmade frozen custard remains the cornerstone of what drove Ritter’s past success. But new offerings such as Italian ice and, for the health conscious, tart frozen yogurt and sugar-free custard, have been added in an attempt to appeal to a larger customer base.

Perhaps even more important, TruFoods is branching out from the traditional, free-standing modular units that can be expensive for a franchisee to purchase and usually are only open seasonally, which can dampen sales potential.

TruFoods’ expansion plans include Ritter’s locations in shopping centers and in existing restaurants or convenience stores. The company also has plans for more so-called scoop shops, in which the custard is not actually made on the premises.

A franchisee’s initial investment can be as little as $72,500 for a shop inside an existing restaurant or as high as $750,000 for a free-standing unit, according to TruFoods’ franchise disclosure document filed with the Indiana Secretary of State.

Steve Delaney, a partner at the Indianapolis-based SiteHawk Retail Real Estate brokerage and former owner of several ice cream shops, supports the new strategy.

“Going into more traditional locations that are anchored would help,” he said. “Most of their locations are secondary and destination locations, which was a big part of their problem.”

TruFoods wants to expand in states where it already has locations: Indiana, Florida, Michigan, Ohio, New York and Texas.

Tim Mallet, a Ritter’s franchisee who operates a free-standing shop in Warsaw in northern Indiana and another in Portage, Mich., has witnessed firsthand the transition of ownership from the Ritter family to TruFoods.

After spending 10 years as an Eli Lilly and Co. sales representative in the Kalamazoo, Mich., area, Mallet became business partners in 2000 with a former Lilly colleague who had opened a Ritter’s. Mallet since has purchased his partner's share of the business.

Under Ritter ownership, Mallet appreciated that he could speak directly to John Ritter when he had questions or concerns. Conversely, though, the wherewithal to implement marketing and long-range planning strategies was lacking, he said.

The tradeoff in dealing with a large corporation that might not be as responsive is that it has the resources to assist in brand development and management issues, Mallet said.

“It’s neither good nor bad,” he said. “It’s just different.”

What’s remained the same, however, is the influx of competition. Since Mallet opened his shop, rivals Cold Stone Creamery, Culver’s, Marble Slab Creamery and Sonic have located within two blocks of him.

“I’m paying my bills,” he said, “but it’s not like it used to be.”

Mallet has the safety net of his full-time job as a director of pharmacy at a community health center. Still, he’s anticipating an economic turnaround this year.

Ochiogrosso at TruFoods is confident his company can help reverse the decline of the Ritter’s franchise as well.

“It’s still an inexpensive treat,” he said of the frozen custard. “You can take your family to a Ritter’s and still not break the bank.”


  • TruFoods a Good Fit
    We own a Ritter's Franchise and we are only very positive about TruFoods ownership. They have worked very hard with us to make our business work. They realize that if we succeed they will succeed. This is the best ice cream out there!
  • misled
    I happen to be one of the former franchisees misled by LEMKE @ THE RITTERS,it was a real nightmare .Feel free to call me before you get involved with TRU FOODS the last 2 years of the nightmare was with TRU FOODS .CALL ME 843-384-1970em
  • Drive Thru
    I am always craving Ritter's custard nowadays. With a toddler in tow, I would be so much more likely to cruise through a drive-thru to get my ice cream fix at Ritter's instead of waiting until I get home or going to Dairy Queen.
  • I Agree!
    We miss the Ritter's we had in Carmel. The custard was delicious, even the low calorie variety! Hope that someone opens up that location on Range Line Road once again.
  • Ritters - Good
    We shop lots in Greenfield and really miss them, since they closed. Bring 'em back and add more. Can we get an Athur Treachers, in Indy, too? :)

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. You are correct that Obamacare requires health insurance policies to include richer benefits and protects patients who get sick. That's what I was getting at when I wrote above, "That’s because Obamacare required insurers to take all customers, regardless of their health status, and also established a floor on how skimpy the benefits paid for by health plans could be." I think it's vital to know exactly how much the essential health benefits are costing over previous policies. Unless we know the cost of the law, we can't do a cost-benefit analysis. Taxes were raised in order to offset a 31% rise in health insurance premiums, an increase that paid for richer benefits. Are those richer benefits worth that much or not? That's the question we need to answer. This study at least gets us started on doing so.

    2. *5 employees per floor. Either way its ridiculous.

    3. Jim, thanks for always ready my stuff and providing thoughtful comments. I am sure that someone more familiar with research design and methods could take issue with Kowalski's study. I thought it was of considerable value, however, because so far we have been crediting Obamacare for all the gains in coverage and all price increases, neither of which is entirely fair. This is at least a rigorous attempt to sort things out. Maybe a quixotic attempt, but it's one of the first ones I've seen try to do it in a sophisticated way.

    4. In addition to rewriting history, the paper (or at least your summary of it) ignores that Obamacare policies now must provide "essential health benefits". Maybe Mr Wall has always been insured in a group plan but even group plans had holes you could drive a truck through, like the Colts defensive line last night. Individual plans were even worse. So, when you come up with a study that factors that in, let me know, otherwise the numbers are garbage.

    5. You guys are absolutely right: Cummins should build a massive 80-story high rise, and give each employee 5 floors. Or, I suppose they could always rent out the top floors if they wanted, since downtown office space is bursting at the seams (http://www.ibj.com/article?articleId=49481).