IBJNews

Ritter's buyer embarking on custard chain turnaround

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The once-formidable Ritter’s Frozen Custard chain could be on the cusp of a turnaround under new ownership that is embarking on a plan to have 100 locations within five years.

New York-based TruFoods, which bought the company in May 2008 for an undisclosed price, has spent the past two years revamping the business model and  now is seeking new franchisees.

TruFoods should have commitments signed for about 10 new franchises in 2010, with a goal of opening four of those by the end of the year, said Gary Occhiogrosso, the company’s chief development officer.

“We basically took a step back,” Occhiogrosso said. “We took a look at what worked and a good focused look at things that weren’t working as well.”

Ritter’s has 17 stores in Indiana, including nine in the Indianapolis area. Overall, it has 31 locations in six states, or about half as many as the chain had just five years ago before problems began plaguing its former owners.

Hoosiers have been passionate about Ritter’s handmade frozen custard ever since it launched in Franklin more than 20 years ago. Yet while the ice cream is sweet, the story of the former mom-and-pop company’s attempt to grow is anything but.

John Ritter and his wife, Bonny, started the company in 1989. At the time, it was a novelty—frozen custard made fresh each day inside a retro-looking circular building that featured only outdoor seating.

The chain boasted 18 locations in 2000. By 2005—its peak—it had 60.

But the company’s former CEO, Saul Lemke, who acquired control in 2003 (with the Ritter family retaining a major stake), was roundly criticized by franchisees for expanding too quickly while neglecting daily operations.

Add an onslaught of new competitors into the mix and you have the ingredients for a rocky road.

The Ritter family reacquired control in 2004, installing John’s son Bob as CEO. But the damage had been done.

TruFoods specializes in buying and turning around underperforming brands. The company’s other holdings include Arthur Treacher’s Fish & Chips, Pudgie’s Famous Chicken and Wall Street Deli.

The handmade frozen custard remains the cornerstone of what drove Ritter’s past success. But new offerings such as Italian ice and, for the health conscious, tart frozen yogurt and sugar-free custard, have been added in an attempt to appeal to a larger customer base.

Perhaps even more important, TruFoods is branching out from the traditional, free-standing modular units that can be expensive for a franchisee to purchase and usually are only open seasonally, which can dampen sales potential.

TruFoods’ expansion plans include Ritter’s locations in shopping centers and in existing restaurants or convenience stores. The company also has plans for more so-called scoop shops, in which the custard is not actually made on the premises.

A franchisee’s initial investment can be as little as $72,500 for a shop inside an existing restaurant or as high as $750,000 for a free-standing unit, according to TruFoods’ franchise disclosure document filed with the Indiana Secretary of State.

Steve Delaney, a partner at the Indianapolis-based SiteHawk Retail Real Estate brokerage and former owner of several ice cream shops, supports the new strategy.

“Going into more traditional locations that are anchored would help,” he said. “Most of their locations are secondary and destination locations, which was a big part of their problem.”

TruFoods wants to expand in states where it already has locations: Indiana, Florida, Michigan, Ohio, New York and Texas.

Tim Mallet, a Ritter’s franchisee who operates a free-standing shop in Warsaw in northern Indiana and another in Portage, Mich., has witnessed firsthand the transition of ownership from the Ritter family to TruFoods.

After spending 10 years as an Eli Lilly and Co. sales representative in the Kalamazoo, Mich., area, Mallet became business partners in 2000 with a former Lilly colleague who had opened a Ritter’s. Mallet since has purchased his partner's share of the business.

Under Ritter ownership, Mallet appreciated that he could speak directly to John Ritter when he had questions or concerns. Conversely, though, the wherewithal to implement marketing and long-range planning strategies was lacking, he said.

The tradeoff in dealing with a large corporation that might not be as responsive is that it has the resources to assist in brand development and management issues, Mallet said.

“It’s neither good nor bad,” he said. “It’s just different.”

What’s remained the same, however, is the influx of competition. Since Mallet opened his shop, rivals Cold Stone Creamery, Culver’s, Marble Slab Creamery and Sonic have located within two blocks of him.

“I’m paying my bills,” he said, “but it’s not like it used to be.”

Mallet has the safety net of his full-time job as a director of pharmacy at a community health center. Still, he’s anticipating an economic turnaround this year.

Ochiogrosso at TruFoods is confident his company can help reverse the decline of the Ritter’s franchise as well.

“It’s still an inexpensive treat,” he said of the frozen custard. “You can take your family to a Ritter’s and still not break the bank.”
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • TruFoods a Good Fit
    We own a Ritter's Franchise and we are only very positive about TruFoods ownership. They have worked very hard with us to make our business work. They realize that if we succeed they will succeed. This is the best ice cream out there!
  • misled
    I happen to be one of the former franchisees misled by LEMKE @ THE RITTERS,it was a real nightmare .Feel free to call me before you get involved with TRU FOODS the last 2 years of the nightmare was with TRU FOODS .CALL ME 843-384-1970em
  • Drive Thru
    I am always craving Ritter's custard nowadays. With a toddler in tow, I would be so much more likely to cruise through a drive-thru to get my ice cream fix at Ritter's instead of waiting until I get home or going to Dairy Queen.
  • I Agree!
    We miss the Ritter's we had in Carmel. The custard was delicious, even the low calorie variety! Hope that someone opens up that location on Range Line Road once again.
  • Ritters - Good
    We shop lots in Greenfield and really miss them, since they closed. Bring 'em back and add more. Can we get an Athur Treachers, in Indy, too? :)

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. liek the rest of America

    2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

    3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

    4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

    5. whoa!

    ADVERTISEMENT