IBJNews

Sallie Mae expects split to have 'limited' effect in Indiana

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

SLM Corp., the student lender known as Sallie Mae, is seeking to separate its education loan management and consumer bank businesses into two publicly traded entities.

The Delaware-based firm is a major employer in Indiana, with more than 2,600 employees at offices in Indianapolis, Fishers and Muncie. The company promised last year to add 200 more workers in Muncie as part of a $5 million expansion there.

But Sallie Mae spokeswoman Martha Holler said the separation plan would have only a "limited" impact on its work force size and its facility locations.

“In general, we expect this strategic plan to have limited impact on our total work force size as our intention is to grow each business going forward,” Holler wrote in an email to IBJ. She added, “With regard to facility locations, we expect minimal changes to our geographical configuration.”

Holler also said Sallie Mae needs to sort out which employees will be assigned to each of the two companies, especially in some of the shared services divisions, such as a large IT unit based in Fishers.

"Some of our business areas do provide shared services, and we will need to determine how best to separate or, in some cases, duplicate those functions in the two businesses,” she wrote.

The company’s board of directors appointed Jack Remondi chief executive officer to replace Albert Lord, who will retire from the board and executive management, Sallie Mae said Wednesday in a regulatory filing. The lender announced Lord’s departure in November.

Legislation passed in 2010 cut companies out of the government-guaranteed student loan market, forcing the lender to remake its business to focus on private debt. Sallie Mae made $1.4 billion in education loans in the first quarter, a 22-percent increase from the year-ago period, the company said in an April 17 statement.

The split will “create a better structure for the increasingly different regulatory environment that each of these businesses will operate under in the future,” Remondi said Wednesday on a conference call with investors. “These entities can see better success as two distinct and separate entities rather than as one.”

Both companies will initially be owned by existing shareholders, according to the filing. Assets under the education loan management business will consist of about $118.1 billion in debt under the government’s FFELP program, $31.6 billion in private education loans and $7.9 billion of other assets.

The consumer banking business, to be called Sallie Mae Bank, is projected to have about $9.9 billion of total assets, including private education loans and related origination and servicing platforms, according to the filing.

Soaring student-loan delinquency rates in 2012 were highest among borrowers under age 30 who are repaying debt, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Thirty-five percent were 90 or more days behind, compared with 21 percent in 2004.

Delinquencies in Sallie Mae’s portfolio are “starting to feel a lot better” since the lender stopped making loans for non-traditional schools such as for-profit institutions, Lord said in an April 18 conference call with investors.

Sallie Mae expects the separation to be completed within 12 months, following approval from its board of directors and reviews from the Internal Revenue Service and the Securities and Exchange Commission, according to the filing.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Cramer agrees...says don't buy it and sell it if you own it! Their "pay to play" cost is this issue. As long as they charge customers, they never will attain the critical mass needed to be a successful on company...Jim Cramer quote.

  2. My responses to some of the comments would include the following: 1. Our offer which included the forgiveness of debt (this is an immediate forgiveness and is not "spread over many years")represents debt that due to a reduction of interest rates in the economy arguably represents consideration together with the cash component of our offer that exceeds the $2.1 million apparently offered by another party. 2. The previous $2.1 million cash offer that was turned down by the CRC would have netted the CRC substantially less than $2.1 million. As a result even in hindsight the CRC was wise in turning down that offer. 3. With regard to "concerned Carmelite's" discussion of the previous financing Pedcor gave up $16.5 million in City debt in addition to the conveyance of the garage (appraised at $13 million)in exchange for the $22.5 million cash and debt obligations. The local media never discussed the $16.5 million in debt that we gave up which would show that we gave $29.5 million in value for the $23.5 million. 4.Pedcor would have been much happier if Brian was still operating his Deli and only made this offer as we believe that we can redevelop the building into something that will be better for the City and City Center where both Pedcor the citizens of Carmel have a large investment. Bruce Cordingley, President, Pedcor

  3. I've been looking for news on Corner Bakery, too, but there doesn't seem to be any info out there. I prefer them over Panera and Paradise so can't wait to see where they'll be!

  4. WGN actually is two channels: 1. WGN Chicago, seen only in Chicago (and parts of Canada) - this station is one of the flagship CW affiliates. 2. WGN America - a nationwide cable channel that doesn't carry any CW programming, and doesn't have local affiliates. (In addition, as WGN is owned by Tribune, just like WTTV, WTTK, and WXIN, I can't imagine they would do anything to help WISH.) In Indianapolis, CW programming is already seen on WTTV 4 and WTTK 29, and when CBS takes over those stations' main channels, the CW will move to a sub channel, such as 4.2 or 4.3 and 29.2 or 29.3. TBS is only a cable channel these days and does not affiliate with local stations. WISH could move the MyNetwork affiliation from WNDY 23 to WISH 8, but I am beginning to think they may prefer to put together their own lineup of syndicated programming instead. While much of it would be "reruns" from broadcast or cable, that's pretty much what the MyNetwork does these days anyway. So since WISH has the choice, they may want to customize their lineup by choosing programs that they feel will garner better ratings in this market.

  5. The Pedcor debt is from the CRC paying ~$23M for the Pedcor's parking garage at City Center that is apprased at $13M. Why did we pay over the top money for a private businesses parking? What did we get out of it? Pedcor got free parking for their apartment and business tenants. Pedcor now gets another building for free that taxpayers have ~$3M tied up in. This is NOT a win win for taxpayers. It is just a win for Pedcor who contributes heavily to the Friends of Jim Brainard. The campaign reports are on the Hamilton County website. http://www2.hamiltoncounty.in.gov/publicdocs/Campaign%20Finance%20Images/defaultfiles.asp?ARG1=Campaign Finance Images&ARG2=/Brainard, Jim

ADVERTISEMENT