Kim: Save your riskiest bets for play-money portfolio

Mickey Kim
November 23, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

KimOver the past 2-1/2 years, I have preached “slow and steady wins the long-term investment race.” I have warned of the dangers of trying to time the market and chasing hot performance, both of which lead to self-inflicted financial damage that my friend Carl Richards refers to as the “behavior gap.” I have urged investors to let the miracle of compound interest work for them.

All the above require extreme patience and discipline and can take years or even decades to bear fruit. On an intellectual level, most investors “get it.” Unfortunately, this runs counter to human nature, which demands instant gratification.

It’s the same reason I order the 22-ounce, bone-in ribeye when I know the 8-ounce salmon would be much better for me. Trust me, I get it.

Last month, The Wall Street Journal published Liam Plevin’s “Investing for the Fun of It,” which discussed the merit of having a small “play money” portfolio with which to attempt to fulfill your fantasy of making a quick killing, much like the clever-talking baby in the E*Trade commercials.

The idea is to protect the nest egg that you need to meet your long-term financial goals by confining your urge to gamble to a much smaller account created for that purpose. In the unlikely event it works out, maybe you can buy that Ferrari you’ve always coveted. If it disintegrates, it doesn’t affect your retirement lifestyle.

Plevin cited steps “play money” investors should take to “keep their expectations realistic and their wagers within safe boundaries.”

• Understand your motives. If you’re trading stocks for the adrenaline rush and thrill of possibly hitting the jackpot, that kind of action can be found in any casino. If you find researching and developing investment theses intellectually stimulating, you’ll have the chance to unleash your inner CNBC guru.

• Prepare to lose. Successful investing is a difficult prospect, even for professionals who have amassed fantastic long-term records and devote 100 percent of their focus to the task. Just note that these are the folks you’re competing against. There’s an old poker truism: “If you’ve been in the game 30 minutes and you don’t know who the patsy is, you’re the patsy.”

• Set clear limits. A “play money” account should exist only if your nest egg is fully funded and it should never account for more than 5 percent of your assets. It’s strictly money you can live without. As Vanguard founder John Bogle said, “Enjoy the fun of gambling and the thrill of the chase, but not with your rent money and certainly not with college education funds for your children, nor your retirement nest egg.”

• Remember, it’s for fun. “Don’t take yourself too seriously. If you look in the mirror and think you see Warren Buffett grinning back, it could be a warning you’re about to do something foolish.”

While there’s no sure way to reach investment nirvana, having a disciplined, patient approach gives you your best chance for success. Still, I understand that the Sirens’ “you can get rich, quick” song holds powerful allure.

Unlike Odysseus, we don’t have sailors we can command to tie us to the mast to save us from wrecking our financial ships on the rocks. So perhaps having a “play money” portfolio is the next best thing.•


Kim is the chief operating officer and chief compliance officer for Kirr Marbach & Co. LLC, an investment adviser based in Columbus, Ind. He can be reached at (812) 376-9444 or mickey@kirrmar.com.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Gay marriage is coming, whether or not these bigots and zealots like it or not. We must work to ensure future generations remember the likes of Greg Zoeller like they do the racists of our past...in shame.

  2. Perhaps a diagram of all the network connections of all politicians to their supporters and those who are elite/wealthy and how they have voted on bills that may have benefited their supporters. The truth may hurt, but there are no non-disclosures in government.

  3. I'm sure these lawyers were having problems coming up with any non-religious reason to ban same-sex marriage. I've asked proponents of this ban the question many times and the only answers I have received were religious reasons. Quite often the reason had to do with marriage to a pet or marriage between a group even though those have nothing at all to do with this. I'm looking forward to less discrimination in our state soon!

  4. They never let go of the "make babies" argument. It fails instantaneously because a considerable percentage of heterosexual marriages don't produce any children either. Although if someone wants to pass a law that any couple, heterosexual or homosexual, cannot be legally married (and therefore not utilize all legal, financial, and tax benefits that come with it) until they have produced a biological child, that would be fun to see as a spectator. "All this is a reflection of biology," Fisher answered. "Men and women make babies, same-sex couples do not... we have to have a mechanism to regulate that, and marriage is that mechanism." The civil contract called marriage does NOTHING to regulate babymaking, whether purposefully or accidental. These conservatives really need to understand that sex education and access to birth control do far more to regulate babymaking in this country. Moreover, last I checked, same-sex couples can make babies in a variety of ways, and none of them are by accident. Same-sex couples often foster and adopt the children produced by the many accidental pregnancies from mixed-sex couples who have failed at self-regulating their babymaking capabilities.

  5. Every parent I know with kids from 6 -12 has 98.3 on its car radio all the time!! Even when my daughter isn't in the car I sometimes forget to change stations. Not everybody wants to pay for satellite radio. This will be a huge disappointment to my 9 year old. And to me - there's so many songs on the radio that I don't want her listening to.