IBJOpinion

Kim: Save your riskiest bets for play-money portfolio

Mickey Kim
November 23, 2013
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

KimOver the past 2-1/2 years, I have preached “slow and steady wins the long-term investment race.” I have warned of the dangers of trying to time the market and chasing hot performance, both of which lead to self-inflicted financial damage that my friend Carl Richards refers to as the “behavior gap.” I have urged investors to let the miracle of compound interest work for them.

All the above require extreme patience and discipline and can take years or even decades to bear fruit. On an intellectual level, most investors “get it.” Unfortunately, this runs counter to human nature, which demands instant gratification.

It’s the same reason I order the 22-ounce, bone-in ribeye when I know the 8-ounce salmon would be much better for me. Trust me, I get it.

Last month, The Wall Street Journal published Liam Plevin’s “Investing for the Fun of It,” which discussed the merit of having a small “play money” portfolio with which to attempt to fulfill your fantasy of making a quick killing, much like the clever-talking baby in the E*Trade commercials.

The idea is to protect the nest egg that you need to meet your long-term financial goals by confining your urge to gamble to a much smaller account created for that purpose. In the unlikely event it works out, maybe you can buy that Ferrari you’ve always coveted. If it disintegrates, it doesn’t affect your retirement lifestyle.

Plevin cited steps “play money” investors should take to “keep their expectations realistic and their wagers within safe boundaries.”

• Understand your motives. If you’re trading stocks for the adrenaline rush and thrill of possibly hitting the jackpot, that kind of action can be found in any casino. If you find researching and developing investment theses intellectually stimulating, you’ll have the chance to unleash your inner CNBC guru.

• Prepare to lose. Successful investing is a difficult prospect, even for professionals who have amassed fantastic long-term records and devote 100 percent of their focus to the task. Just note that these are the folks you’re competing against. There’s an old poker truism: “If you’ve been in the game 30 minutes and you don’t know who the patsy is, you’re the patsy.”

• Set clear limits. A “play money” account should exist only if your nest egg is fully funded and it should never account for more than 5 percent of your assets. It’s strictly money you can live without. As Vanguard founder John Bogle said, “Enjoy the fun of gambling and the thrill of the chase, but not with your rent money and certainly not with college education funds for your children, nor your retirement nest egg.”

• Remember, it’s for fun. “Don’t take yourself too seriously. If you look in the mirror and think you see Warren Buffett grinning back, it could be a warning you’re about to do something foolish.”

While there’s no sure way to reach investment nirvana, having a disciplined, patient approach gives you your best chance for success. Still, I understand that the Sirens’ “you can get rich, quick” song holds powerful allure.

Unlike Odysseus, we don’t have sailors we can command to tie us to the mast to save us from wrecking our financial ships on the rocks. So perhaps having a “play money” portfolio is the next best thing.•

__________

Kim is the chief operating officer and chief compliance officer for Kirr Marbach & Co. LLC, an investment adviser based in Columbus, Ind. He can be reached at (812) 376-9444 or mickey@kirrmar.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I never thought I'd see the day when a Republican Mayor would lead the charge in attempting to raise every tax we have to pay. Now it's income taxes and property taxes that Ballard wants to increase. And to pay for a pre-K program? Many studies have shown that pre-K offer no long-term educational benefits whatsoever. And Ballard is pitching it as a way of fighting crime? Who is he kidding? It's about government provided day care. It's a shame that we elected a Republican who has turned out to be a huge big spending, big taxing, big borrowing liberal Democrat.

  2. Why do we blame the unions? They did not create the 11 different school districts that are the root of the problem.

  3. I was just watching an AOW race from cleveland in 1997...in addition to the 65K for the race, there were more people in boats watching that race from the lake than were IndyCar fans watching the 2014 IndyCar season finale in the Fontana grandstands. Just sayin...That's some resurgence modern IndyCar has going. Almost profitable, nobody in the grandstands and TV ratings dropping 61% at some tracks in the series. Business model..."CRAZY" as said by a NASCAR track general manager. Yup, this thing is purring like a cat! Sponsors...send them your cash, pronto!!! LOL, not a chance.

  4. I'm sure Indiana is paradise for the wealthy and affluent, but what about the rest of us? Over the last 40 years, conservatives and the business elite have run this country (and state)into the ground. The pendulum will swing back as more moderate voters get tired of Reaganomics and regressive social policies. Add to that the wave of minority voters coming up in the next 10 to 15 years and things will get better. unfortunately we have to suffer through 10 more years of gerrymandered districts and dispropionate representation.

  5. Funny thing....rich people telling poor people how bad the other rich people are wanting to cut benefits/school etc and that they should vote for those rich people that just did it. Just saying..............

ADVERTISEMENT