IBJNews

Shelbyville factory in trouble again, faces record IOSHA fines

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Occupational Safety and Health Administration said Wednesday it has issued a record fine after an inspection at a Shelbyville glass factory.

Pilkington North America faces $453,000 in proposed penalties after state inspectors detected 29 safety violations at the plant, according to agency documents.

The next-largest set of fines IOSHA has on record was $332,250 that BP paid in a 2006 settlement for violations at its oil refinery in Whiting, said Bob Dittmer, a spokesman for the Indiana Department of Labor, which includes IOSHA.

Pilkington’s 350-employee Shelbyville factory produces glass for automakers such as Toyota, Honda, Mitsubishi, Nissan and General Motors. Toledo, Ohio-based Pilkington North America is a subsidiary of NSG Group, which has its headquarters in Tokyo.

The safety allegations, which IOSHA issued to the company Monday, follow $150,000 in fines that IOSHA charged the company in July for six “repeat” violations. Those fines stemmed from a follow-up investigation after the company received $32,000 in fines—later reduced to $15,000—in November 2010 after a worker died on the job.

An Aug. 18 IBJ story detailed Pilkington's struggles to address IOSHA's safety concerns.

The catalyst for the safety inspections was the September 2010 death of 59-year-old maintenance technician Kelly Dean Caudill of Connersville.

Caudill, who worked at Pilkington for 19 years, was repairing a conveyor that moves broken glass that another company recycles and resells. A nearby air cylinder activated and crushed Caudill. He later died at a hospital.

The initial, post-accident investigation and the follow-up earlier this year targeted specific issues at the plant.

IOSHA returned to the plant most recently because employees complained of ongoing facility-wide safety problems, Dittmer said.

This time, the agency was more thorough as staff conducted a “comprehensive” inspection, also known as a “wall-to-wall.”

“We inspected everything, overturned ever single rock we could lay our hands on,” he said.

In the report, violations ranged from missing warning signs to knowingly exposing workers to dangerous machinery without proper safety guards, IOSHA records state.

Pilkington spokeswoman Roberta Steedman wrote in an e-mail that the company has corrected some of the issues while it is evaluating others to determine how to address concerns.

Pilkington has filed paperwork saying it intends to appeal the July safety orders.

The company said it intends to keep informally meeting with IOSHA to discuss the citations.

“However, there is a short window for completing informal settlements, and complicated matters often require additional time,” Steedman wrote.

Pilkington notified IOSHA it would contest the safety orders to “preserve [its] rights and continue discussions and negotiations with IOSHA aimed at resolving this matter, while doing everything possible to ensure the safety of [its] people.”

The case is set to go before an administrative law judge, who will rule whether the company must comply with IOSHA’s orders and pay the fine if there is no settlement.

Pilkington has until Sept. 14 to correct the newest safety orders and pay the penalty or contest the violations. The company can also set up an informal meeting to review the report’s details and set up a timetable to address IOSHA’s concerns.

If the auto supplier chooses to appeal the most recent violations, as well, the judge could decide whether to combine the two cases into one.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • anonymous
    Pilkington is a joke...I've worked in construction for the past ten years in the union and in my experience there compared to pilkington is crazy...there are a lot of hardworking ppl there but also lazy lazy inconsiderate ppl.... that's when ppl die or get hurt...OSHA is trying to get$$$$ paid off of a death of an employee... didnt know him but I would not doubt that someone wasn't doing the right thing so OSHA and pilkington needs to address how the safety orientations are conducted and find good loyal employees that care about safety rather than just showing up for a paycheck...that's my 2 cents
  • @David
    You expect people to quit a job theyve had for 10-15years, losing seniority and pay raises, if the working conditions have become dangerous? No employee complaint started this process; someone died. The government protects consumers as well. Obviously, you're ignorant(not an insult, you're just uninformed)
  • Really?
    Did you miss this sentence? "The catalyst for the safety inspections was the September 2010 death of 59-year-old maintenance technician Kelly Dean Caudill of Connersville."
  • Leave government out
    This is what is wrong with our country. If people don't like the working conditions, then get another job. Don't complain to the government, which shouldn't be sticking their noses into Pilkington anyway.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Socialized medicine works great for white people in Scandanavia. It works well in Costa Rica for a population that is partly white and partly mestizo. I don't really see Obamacare as something aimed against whites. I think that is a Republican canard designed to elicit support from white people for republican candidates who don't care about them any more than democrats care about the non-whites they pander to with their phony maneuvers. But what is different between Costa Rica nd the Scandanavian nations on one hand and the US on the other? SIZE. Maybe the US is just too damn big. Maybe it just needs to be divided into smaller self governing pieces like when the old Holy Roman Empire was dismantled. Maybe we are always trying the same set of solutions for different kinds of people as if we were all the same. Oh-- I know-- that is liberal dogma, that we are all the same. Which is the most idiotic American notion going right back to the propaganda of 1776. All men are different and their differences are myriad and that which is different is not equal. The state which pretends men are all the same is going to force men to be the same. That is what America does here, that is what we do in our stupid overseas wars, that is how we destroy true diversity and true difference, and we are all as different groups of folks, feeling the pains of how capitalism is grinding us down into equally insignificant proletarian microconsumers with no other identity whether we like it or not. And the Marxists had this much right about the War of Independence: it was fundamentally a war of capitalist against feudal systems. America has been about big money since day one and whatever gets in the way is crushed. Health care is just another market and Obamacare, to the extent that it Rationalizes and makes more uniform a market which should actually be really different in nature and delivery from place to place-- well that will serve the interests of the biggest capitalist stakeholders in health care which is not Walmart for Gosh Sakes it is the INSURANCE INDUSTRY. CUI BONO Obamacare? The insurance industry. So republicans drop the delusion pro capitalist scales from your eyes this has almost nothing to do with race or "socialism" it has to do mostly with what the INSURANCE INDUSTRY wants to have happen in order to make their lives and profits easier.

    2. Read the article - the reason they can't justify staying is they have too many medicare/medicaid patients and the re-imbursements for transporting these patient is so low.

    3. I would not vote for Bayh if he did run. I also wouldn't vote for Pence. My guess is that Bayh does not have the stomach to oppose persons on the far left or far right. Also, outside of capitalizing on his time as U. S. Senator (and his wife's time as a board member to several companies) I don't know if he is willing to fight for anything. If people who claim to be in the middle walk away from fights with the right and left wing, what are we left with? Extremes. It's probably best for Bayh if he does not have the stomach for the fight but the result is no middle ground.

    4. JK - I meant that the results don't ring true. I also questioned the 10-year-old study because so much in the "health care system" has changed since the study was made. Moreover, it was hard to get to any overall conclusion or observation with the article. But....don't be defensive given my comments; I still think you do the best job of any journalist in the area shedding light and insight on important health care issues.

    5. Probably a good idea he doesn't run. I for one do not want someone who lives in VIRGINIA to be the governor. He gave it some thought, but he likes Virginia too much. What a name I cannot say on this site! The way these people think and operate amuses me.

    ADVERTISEMENT