The town of Speedway’s massive redevelopment project has hit a bump in the road over its effort to build a roundabout
at a high-profile intersection near the Indianapolis Motor Speedway.
As part of its 16th Street reconstruction project, the town wants to build a roundabout where the street intersects with
Georgetown and Crawfordsville roads near the main entrance of the track.
But a billboard near the intersection, at 16th and Main streets, has landed its owner, San Antonio-based Clear Channel Outdoor
Inc., and the Speedway Redevelopment Commission in court.
The commission filed suit on Feb. 21 against the company in Marion Superior Court and is threatening eminent domain if Clear
Channel doesn’t give up its lease to the billboard.
Speedway already has purchased the quarter-acre sliver on which the billboard stands from owner Carl Culmann. But the town
needs to acquire Clear Channel’s “leasehold interest” in the parcel and remove the billboard to begin work
on the roundabout, according to the lawsuit.
Clear Channel rejected the commission’s offer of $165,000 and hasn’t countered with an alternative, said Scott
Harris, executive director of the commission.
“We followed all of the federal and state guidelines, which require that we do appraisals and tend an offer and give
them 30 days to either accept it or reject it,” he said.
Brett Beshore, Clear Channel’s Indianapolis division president, declined to comment on the lawsuit. The company's
corporate headquarters said via e-mail Monday morning that it would be "premature for us to comment on the lawsuit until
we have the opportunity to fully review the filing."
The billboard in dispute is behind a vacant house on the parcel of property. Harris said the town plans to tear down the
home to build the roundabout. Other road improvements near the intersection include new curbs, gutters and sidewalks, as well
as road widenings.
The 16th Street reconstruction project is part of an overall $500 million redevelopment project town leaders hope will transform
Speedway into a year-round racing-themed destination.
Speedway officials broke ground in November 2009 on the first phase, which involved $6.7 million in
road improvements to Main Street, laying the foundation for redevelopment.
The ambitious project includes more than 350 acres from Main Street to Holt Road and from 16th to 10th streets, just south
of IMS.
In all, 2.5 million square feet of new development could be constructed, which could return a 10-year economic impact of
up to $5.2 billion and more than 2,000 jobs, Speedway officials say.
Harris of the commission said the dispute with Clear Channel shouldn’t delay the building of the roundabout because
an exact timetable has not been set.
Court documents show Clear Channel signed a long-term lease with Culmann in April 2011 in which annual rent of $7,000 is
set to increase in stages, ultimately rising to more than $11,200 in 2036.

















IBJ Conversations
12 Comments
Add Comment
There's 4 billboards there (has been for eons), so the cost is likely higher to replace all 4 faces (tho they now do double/double billboards and load them up). What about the pittance they offered to the other 16th St. properties that don't want to sell (not holding out for more money, just want to be part of the new development as long time business owners)? There's another billboard on one site (with three rotating signs that switch, using only the space of one sign). That sign is the owner's retirement security as she's an older, widow in ill health.
Clear Channel signed a multi year lease with full knowledge that it's billboard was going to have to come down. They can't cry foul - it was public knowledge since at least 2008. There tactic seems to be to get enrichment on tax dollars. that's shameful. They should relocate and accept only enough money to cover the cost of moving.
More likely, the company is simply trying to negotiate to get the most they can for the lease, and I do not blame them, but I also do not feel sorry for them, nor do I think they have been "insulted."
The leased space will be taken, and it is simply an issue of a price being settled on--and I doubt it will be anywhere near $1.65 million.
I am tired of people complaining about the elected folks that represent the taxpayers, especially when they are totally off base.
It is really interesting that someone would side so easily with a private entity concerned only with their bottom line vs. taxpayers trying to bring development to a low income area.