IBJNews

Tighter rules for scholarship program advance

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana's popular 21st Century Scholars program that provides full college scholarships to needy students who stay out of trouble would have stiffer requirements under a proposal approved Thursday by a legislative committee.

The Senate Appropriations Committee voted 8-4 to endorse a bill making changes to that program and others in the state's college financial aid system.

The fast growth of the 21st Century scholarship in recent years forced the shifting of money from other programs in the state's $248 million financial aid budget last school year, said Claudia Braman, executive director of the State Student Assistance Commission.

Nearly 13,000 students received the 21st Century scholarships last year — up 44 percent from four years earlier. Braman said the commission had to transfer about $17 million from other funds to cover its $45 million cost.

A principal change to the program would increase the required high school grade-point average from 2.0 to 2.5 for a student to receive the scholarship.

Committee Chairman Luke Kenley, R-Noblesville, said money going toward the program will be better spent on college students who've met the tougher high school GPA standard.

"We know that will be a better predictor of performance," he said.

The 21st Century Scholars program was started in 1990 under then-Gov. Evan Bayh. Students in sixth through eighth grades who qualify for free and reduced-price lunches can enroll in the program by signing a pledge to stay out of criminal trouble and drug-free and meet the grade standard in exchange for four years of free tuition at an Indiana public college.

Sen. Lindel Hume, D-Princeton, questioned whether the higher GPA requirement would discourage some students from trying to continue their education after high school once they realize they won't qualify.

Braman said those students could still seek grants based on income if they enroll at Ivy Tech Community College or another school.

"We hope this will motive students to try harder," she said.

Under the proposal, the higher GPA standard would start for those youths joining the program after this school year. The nonpartisan Legislative Services Agency estimated that about 1,100 fewer students could qualify a year with the higher standard, cutting the program's cost by $2.8 million a year.

The assistance commission says researchers have found that about 20 percent of those who signed up for the program as middle school students no longer met the low-income requirement as high school seniors.

The administration of Gov. Mitch Daniels wants to change state law to allow a senior-year assessment of financial need — and senators said a bill introduced in the Indiana House would do that.

The bill, which now goes to the full Senate, would also limit state financial aid to only undergraduate students and transfer college financial aid duties involving prison inmates to the Department of Correction.

Officials said the changes were needed to maximize the reach of the state financial aid budget when demand is growing. State figures show nearly 459,000 people applied for state college grants for last school year — an increase of about 130,000 from two years earlier.

"Here in the economic recession, we're seeing how we're being squeezed between one program versus another program," Kenley said. "In the interest of trying to have a better program overall, both in times of recession and in good times, we're trying to smooth the fairness out."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I took Bruce's comments to highlight a glaring issue when it comes to a state's image, and therefore its overall branding. An example is Michigan vs. Indiana. Michigan has done an excellent job of following through on its branding strategy around "Pure Michigan", even down to the detail of the rest stops. Since a state's branding is often targeted to visitors, it makes sense that rest stops, being that point of first impression, should be significant. It is clear that Indiana doesn't care as much about the impression it gives visitors even though our branding as the Crossroads of America does place importance on travel. Bruce's point is quite logical and accurate.

  2. I appreciated the article. I guess I have become so accustomed to making my "pit stops" at places where I can ALSO get gasoline and something hot to eat, that I hardly even notice public rest stops anymore. That said, I do concur with the rationale that our rest stops (if we are to have them at all) can and should be both fiscally-responsible AND designed to make a positive impression about our state.

  3. I don't know about the rest of you but I only stop at these places for one reason, and it's not to picnic. I move trucks for dealers and have been to rest areas in most all 48 lower states. Some of ours need upgrading no doubt. Many states rest areas are much worse than ours. In the rest area on I-70 just past Richmond truckers have to hike about a quarter of a mile. When I stop I;m generally in a bit of a hurry. Convenience,not beauty, is a primary concern.

  4. Community Hospital is the only system to not have layoffs? That is not true. Because I was one of the people who was laid off from East. And all of the LPN's have been laid off. Just because their layoffs were not announced or done all together does not mean people did not lose their jobs. They cherry-picked people from departments one by one. But you add them all up and it's several hundred. And East has had a dramatic drop I in patient beds from 800 to around 125. I know because I worked there for 30 years.

  5. I have obtained my 6 gallon badge for my donation of A Positive blood. I'm sorry to hear that my donation was nothing but a profit center for the Indiana Blood Center.

ADVERTISEMENT